| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
October 21st 03, 11:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
This has been shown before. Get off your fat ass and do an actual test. You will find that a Stainless Steel 102" whip can be marginally beat. You can not realize this by reading a book! Get off your ass. P.S. A 1/4 wave whip of thicker more conductive material can't be beat by a shorter antenna, but my comment was about the common 102" SS whip. Using Mmana to simulate antennas; According to Tnom, you should get your "fat ass" out there and to the experiment yourself! No Frank. You said that. Lancer does not disagree. Therefore there would be no reason for me to tell him to get off his ass and determine the truth. You should get off your ass and determine the truth. |
|
#3
October 22nd 03, 12:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In , wrote:
This has been shown before. Get off your fat ass and do an actual test. You will find that a Stainless Steel 102" whip can be marginally beat. You can not realize this by reading a book! Get off your ass. P.S. A 1/4 wave whip of thicker more conductive material can't be beat by a shorter antenna, but my comment was about the common 102" SS whip. Using Mmana to simulate antennas; According to Tnom, you should get your "fat ass" out there and to the experiment yourself! No Frank. You said that. Lancer does not disagree. Therefore there would be no reason for me to tell him to get off his ass and determine the truth. I see.... the truth doesn't matter just as long as he agrees with you. You should get off your ass and determine the truth. Like I said, I already have. YOU need to get off YOUR fat ass and find out why your results were so inconsistent. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#4
October 22nd 03, 04:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
snip
No Frank. You said that. Lancer does not disagree. Therefore there would be no reason for me to tell him to get off his ass and determine the truth. I see.... the truth doesn't matter just as long as he agrees with you. He does not dispute what I say so why would I tell him to test the antennas. He pointed out with a different method (Mmana) that Stainless Steel is not the best conductor. He even posted numbers. What have you posted Frank? Where are your numbers? Where is your test? You should get off your ass and determine the truth. Like I said, I already have. YOU need to get off YOUR fat ass and find out why your results were so inconsistent. The tests (all three of them) confirmed that a SS 108" can be beat. |
|
#5
October 22nd 03, 01:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:02:58 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: In , lancer wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:59:06 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:53:01 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , wrote: snip At 27 MHz, any antenna shorter then 5 feet is a waste of time. snip Not true. There are antennas at five feet that will match or even surpass a 102" SS whip. Bull****. This has been shown before. Get off your fat ass and do an actual test. You will find that a Stainless Steel 102" whip can be marginally beat. You can not realize this by reading a book! Get off your ass. P.S. A 1/4 wave whip of thicker more conductive material can't be beat by a shorter antenna, but my comment was about the common 102" SS whip. Using Mmana to simulate antennas; According to Tnom, you should get your "fat ass" out there and to the experiment yourself! I'd love to do that, might be a good winter project. |
|
#6
October 22nd 03, 01:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In , Lancer
wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:02:58 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , lancer wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:59:06 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:53:01 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , wrote: snip At 27 MHz, any antenna shorter then 5 feet is a waste of time. snip Not true. There are antennas at five feet that will match or even surpass a 102" SS whip. Bull****. This has been shown before. Get off your fat ass and do an actual test. You will find that a Stainless Steel 102" whip can be marginally beat. You can not realize this by reading a book! Get off your ass. P.S. A 1/4 wave whip of thicker more conductive material can't be beat by a shorter antenna, but my comment was about the common 102" SS whip. Using Mmana to simulate antennas; According to Tnom, you should get your "fat ass" out there and to the experiment yourself! I'd love to do that, might be a good winter project. Then we would have more numbers to compare with Tnom's. And winter would be an excellent time to do it because of the ground conditions (you get snow, don't you?). -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#7
October 22nd 03, 02:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:38:58 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: In , Lancer wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:02:58 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , lancer wrote: On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:59:06 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:53:01 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , wrote: snip At 27 MHz, any antenna shorter then 5 feet is a waste of time. snip Not true. There are antennas at five feet that will match or even surpass a 102" SS whip. Bull****. This has been shown before. Get off your fat ass and do an actual test. You will find that a Stainless Steel 102" whip can be marginally beat. You can not realize this by reading a book! Get off your ass. P.S. A 1/4 wave whip of thicker more conductive material can't be beat by a shorter antenna, but my comment was about the common 102" SS whip. Using Mmana to simulate antennas; According to Tnom, you should get your "fat ass" out there and to the experiment yourself! I'd love to do that, might be a good winter project. Then we would have more numbers to compare with Tnom's. And winter would be an excellent time to do it because of the ground conditions (you get snow, don't you?). Very seldom, we had snow on the ground for a couple of days last year. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| stuff for all hams | General | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| Amateur Radio "outside the box" | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
