Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Twistedhed" wrote in message ... Large corporations pay fines opposed to having their folks go to jail. The obvious exceptions were the Michael Milkens. You forgot about the savings and loan scandals, the Enron executives going to jail, Martha Stewart etc. That's not how it works with franchises. Franchises are required to carry certain items. But not all items. How many time have you heard, but never really paid attention to, the statement at the end of commercials etc. that states "At participating stores"? Just because it is a franchise doesn't automatically mean they carry everything a company own store does. In fact I've been in many Pilot Travel centers and I specifically check the two-way radio section out just for fun. Funny how some of them you don't see even one of those import radios the FCC has fined Pilot over. The fines are paid and its business as usual. These companies usually don't fight these fines. In fact, there is no large corporation has lodged such a court room battle (which you speak of concerning radio gear, amps, etc) for the exact reason you mention...it is much easier tand cheaper to pay the fine and continue,,,,,business-as-usual. After they remove the offending product. Look how skittish the TV stations are after the Janet Jackson "wardrobe malfunction". It was only a $550K fine to the network. I'm sure it didn't dent their bank account very much. It wasn't much bigger than the fine that Pilot got. The networks are running scared about what they show on the air to the point where some local stations wouldn't air the uncut movie "Saving Private Ryan" for veterans day because they were afraid they would get slapped with another fine. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Twistedhed" wrote in message ... The ONLY way to change this is via legislation, and we all know the angry hammie who is pre-occupied with such nonsense is merely reactive, not proactive. As silly as it is it just so happens that its the "angry hammie", a.k.a. the ARRL, that is going to save the CBer's behind. What I'm talking about is the direction the FCC is going in regards to the BPL issue. Whether you like it or not BPL is going to affect everybody using HF, irregardless if they so happen to be a Ham or CBer. It would be much more productive if the bandwidth on this news group wasn't wasted debating the same old issues, but instead joining together in a united front to fight the FCC, and the deep pocket corporations, wanting to pollute the airwaves with RF trash from the digital signals on the power lines using BPL.The CBers really need some kind of national origination to represent their interests. Right now they're getting a free ride, so to speak, courtesy of the ARRL. Anything that benefits the Ham community in regards to stopping BPL also benefits CBers as well since your band, 11m, is right there next to the 10m Ham band. Both bands would be heavily affect by BPL noise. Just something for you to think about while you're ready to pound away at your keyboard in response. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft Again, if ANYTHING changed since the seventies regarding enforcement, it is that now is the best time as any to buy a radio and begin freebanding. Enforcement is practically non-existent unless you draw major attention to yourself with splatter and bleed. Business as usual, and with the cooler weather comes the skip,,,,,27.555 is kicking up major contacts again and no one on the freq is remotely concerned with a single hammie's angry, jealous, errant, and reactive behavior. Happy holidays. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Leland C. Scott" wrote: "Twistedhed" wrote in message ... The ONLY way to change this is via legislation, and we all know the angry hammie who is pre-occupied with such nonsense is merely reactive, not proactive. As silly as it is it just so happens that its the "angry hammie", a.k.a. the ARRL, that is going to save the CBer's behind. What I'm talking about is the direction the FCC is going in regards to the BPL issue. Whether you like it or not BPL is going to affect everybody using HF, irregardless if they so happen to be a Ham or CBer. It would be much more productive if the bandwidth on this news group wasn't wasted debating the same old issues, but instead joining together in a united front to fight the FCC, and the deep pocket corporations, wanting to pollute the airwaves with RF trash from the digital signals on the power lines using BPL.The CBers really need some kind of national origination to represent their interests. Right now they're getting a free ride, so to speak, courtesy of the ARRL. Anything that benefits the Ham community in regards to stopping BPL also benefits CBers as well since your band, 11m, is right there next to the 10m Ham band. Both bands would be heavily affect by BPL noise. Just something for you to think about while you're ready to pound away at your keyboard in response. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft Again, if ANYTHING changed since the seventies regarding enforcement, it is that now is the best time as any to buy a radio and begin freebanding. Enforcement is practically non-existent unless you draw major attention to yourself with splatter and bleed. Business as usual, and with the cooler weather comes the skip,,,,,27.555 is kicking up major contacts again and no one on the freq is remotely concerned with a single hammie's angry, jealous, errant, and reactive behavior. Happy holidays. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skyler King wrote in message ...
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!! "Leland C. Scott" wrote: "Twistedhed" wrote in message ... The ONLY way to change this is via legislation, and we all know the angry hammie who is pre-occupied with such nonsense is merely reactive, not proactive. As silly as it is it just so happens that its the "angry hammie", a.k.a. the ARRL, that is going to save the CBer's behind. What I'm talking about is the direction the FCC is going in regards to the BPL issue. Whether you like it or not BPL is going to affect everybody using HF, irregardless if they so happen to be a Ham or CBer. It would be much more productive if the bandwidth on this news group wasn't wasted debating the same old issues, but instead joining together in a united front to fight the FCC, and the deep pocket corporations, wanting to pollute the airwaves with RF trash from the digital signals on the power lines using BPL.The CBers really need some kind of national origination to represent their interests. Right now they're getting a free ride, so to speak, courtesy of the ARRL. Anything that benefits the Ham community in regards to stopping BPL also benefits CBers as well since your band, 11m, is right there next to the 10m Ham band. Both bands would be heavily affect by BPL noise. Just something for you to think about while you're ready to pound away at your keyboard in response. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft Again, if ANYTHING changed since the seventies regarding enforcement, it is that now is the best time as any to buy a radio and begin freebanding. Enforcement is practically non-existent unless you draw major attention to yourself with splatter and bleed. Business as usual, and with the cooler weather comes the skip,,,,,27.555 is kicking up major contacts again and no one on the freq is remotely concerned with a single hammie's angry, jealous, errant, and reactive behavior. Happy holidays. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft -- Well, BPL is good for something I guess...anything that makes a keyclown miserable is a good thing. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'keyclowns' prevail! | Policy |