Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Frank:
Yep. The good old "hair splitters" come crawling out now. Fact is, and he made them clear!, the company has the antenna and coax, it is a give, he will switching trucks, no time and doesn't wanna pay shop fees with every run, load, etc... The match box is fine, guarantees he will not generate a bunch of shop costs... Any sensible person knows it is a no brainer... He doesn't want to get a damn engineering degree, he wants to use it... John "Frank Gilliland" wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:54:05 -0400, wrote in : If you move the radio from location to location just check the reading. If it's 2:1 or lower don't worry about it. Thanks, I have an SWR meter from radio shack that I've used in the past. I know how to use it. My problem is that I'll be in a different truck everyday and wont be able to set the SWR the way I want to. On Monday I'm gonna call the cb shop that I saw online and ask them about the SWR match box. Below is a cut and paste of this product. Let me know if this will set the SWR without having to mess with the antenna's. "Don't "Live with" High SWR Readings! This Matcher will tune your SWR very low, simply insert inline between radio & Antenna. Has 2 Adjustment knobs. Perfect for Radios with wide channel coverage, indoor antennas, non-tunable mobile antennas, or for using 10 thru 12 meters off 1 antenna. Handles 80w pep. Requires either an SWR meter built into radio, or an optional SWR meter between Radio & Matcher." This is a line flattener. ....oh brother, more voodoo CB terminology. If the line has standing waves on it then it isn't flat, and no matching device on the radio end can reduce or eliminate the line-load mismatch causing the standing waves. The only "line flattener" is a LOAD impedance that matches the LINE impedance. You can't do that at the radio. They can be problematic in that one of the knobs can be bumped and give you an abnormally high SWR reading. Much higher than the antenna itself. Or the antenna can hit a tree and fall off, or the coax could get jammed in the door, or the radio's power leads could be accidently shorted by a sharp edge under the dash....... You also will double the possibility of a loose coax connector, and don't forget that moving the setup will require more time and care. Oh, the turmoil of it all! So why even bother using the CB in the first place if there's going to be the possibility of a problem? If you want to discourage the guy from using a matching device then at least give him some -valid- reasons. Like, you probably won't notice any difference if the SWR is 3:1 and not 1:1, or that the importance of SWR is moot when compared to field strength, or that any matching device isn't going to accomplish squat with a cigarette-lighter radio and a mag-mount antenna. This isn't exactly a performance rig, and the fact is that SWR isn't going to tell you anything -- if you manage to get it to 1:1 you'll get a warm-fuzzy, but that's about it. Just plug it in and talk. If someone hears you, great. If they don't, there's probably nothing you can do short of a full and proper install that will get you heard. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:11:03 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote in : Frank: Yep. The good old "hair splitters" come crawling out now. Fact is, and he made them clear!, the company has the antenna and coax, it is a give, he will switching trucks, no time and doesn't wanna pay shop fees with every run, load, etc... The match box is fine, guarantees he will not generate a bunch of shop costs... It guarantees nothing of the sort, since any improvement is marginal at best..... more than likely he wouldn't notice the difference in a blind comparison. What he -will- notice is that his bandwidth is now more limited (actually -increasing- SWR on the high and low end of the band) because those matchboxes make pretty good preselectors. Any sensible person knows it is a no brainer... Any sensible person would want to know if he's wasting his money on a gimmick that sounds good in theory (and marketing) but does little or nothing for his intended application. He doesn't want to get a damn engineering degree, he wants to use it... Maybe you missed this part: .... Just plug it in and talk. If someone hears you, great. If they don't, there's probably nothing you can do short of a full and proper install that will get you heard. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
I certainly agree with John... the matchbox is not a bad way to go.
Frank, as usual... you are unecessarily negative... and wrong. Professor www.telstar-electronics.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:56:21 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:54:05 -0400, wrote in : If you move the radio from location to location just check the reading. If it's 2:1 or lower don't worry about it. Thanks, I have an SWR meter from radio shack that I've used in the past. I know how to use it. My problem is that I'll be in a different truck everyday and wont be able to set the SWR the way I want to. On Monday I'm gonna call the cb shop that I saw online and ask them about the SWR match box. Below is a cut and paste of this product. Let me know if this will set the SWR without having to mess with the antenna's. "Don't "Live with" High SWR Readings! This Matcher will tune your SWR very low, simply insert inline between radio & Antenna. Has 2 Adjustment knobs. Perfect for Radios with wide channel coverage, indoor antennas, non-tunable mobile antennas, or for using 10 thru 12 meters off 1 antenna. Handles 80w pep. Requires either an SWR meter built into radio, or an optional SWR meter between Radio & Matcher." This is a line flattener. ....oh brother, more voodoo CB terminology. http://www.rockwellcollins.com/ecat/gs/LF-2040.html http://www.listserve.com/archives/co.../msg00270.html http://www.listserve.com/archives/co.../msg00270.html http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/acs/radios/HF-8040.htm http://www.valcom.ca/Guelph/products...-30_photo.html Yup. Sure looks like the term "Line Flattener" is "more voodoo CB terminology" |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
tnom:
Yep, I always worry about terminology... It will allow you to tune the antenna/coax from a 5:1 to a 1:1 and run your transceiver into it--WITHOUT BURNING OUT THE FINALS. The fact that, that is better than replacing finals on a daily basis may not appeal to some--they can chose to NOT use one and burn out their finals, daily, if they chose... Better yet, he can drop into the radio shop on board a truck stop, explain he does not have time, or the permission of the truck owners to start revamping their antennas and coax--I am sure the tech will see it as a no-brainer--RUN A MATCH BOX! Hey, it is america, you can take your choice... John wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:56:21 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:54:05 -0400, wrote in : If you move the radio from location to location just check the reading. If it's 2:1 or lower don't worry about it. Thanks, I have an SWR meter from radio shack that I've used in the past. I know how to use it. My problem is that I'll be in a different truck everyday and wont be able to set the SWR the way I want to. On Monday I'm gonna call the cb shop that I saw online and ask them about the SWR match box. Below is a cut and paste of this product. Let me know if this will set the SWR without having to mess with the antenna's. "Don't "Live with" High SWR Readings! This Matcher will tune your SWR very low, simply insert inline between radio & Antenna. Has 2 Adjustment knobs. Perfect for Radios with wide channel coverage, indoor antennas, non-tunable mobile antennas, or for using 10 thru 12 meters off 1 antenna. Handles 80w pep. Requires either an SWR meter built into radio, or an optional SWR meter between Radio & Matcher." This is a line flattener. ....oh brother, more voodoo CB terminology. http://www.rockwellcollins.com/ecat/gs/LF-2040.html http://www.listserve.com/archives/co.../msg00270.html http://www.listserve.com/archives/co.../msg00270.html http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/acs/radios/HF-8040.htm http://www.valcom.ca/Guelph/products...-30_photo.html Yup. Sure looks like the term "Line Flattener" is "more voodoo CB terminology" |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:50:48 -0400, wrote in
: On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 22:56:21 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:54:05 -0400, wrote in : If you move the radio from location to location just check the reading. If it's 2:1 or lower don't worry about it. Thanks, I have an SWR meter from radio shack that I've used in the past. I know how to use it. My problem is that I'll be in a different truck everyday and wont be able to set the SWR the way I want to. On Monday I'm gonna call the cb shop that I saw online and ask them about the SWR match box. Below is a cut and paste of this product. Let me know if this will set the SWR without having to mess with the antenna's. "Don't "Live with" High SWR Readings! This Matcher will tune your SWR very low, simply insert inline between radio & Antenna. Has 2 Adjustment knobs. Perfect for Radios with wide channel coverage, indoor antennas, non-tunable mobile antennas, or for using 10 thru 12 meters off 1 antenna. Handles 80w pep. Requires either an SWR meter built into radio, or an optional SWR meter between Radio & Matcher." This is a line flattener. ....oh brother, more voodoo CB terminology. http://www.rockwellcollins.com/ecat/gs/LF-2040.html http://www.listserve.com/archives/co.../msg00270.html http://www.listserve.com/archives/co.../msg00270.html http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/acs/radios/HF-8040.htm http://www.valcom.ca/Guelph/products...-30_photo.html Yup. Sure looks like the term "Line Flattener" is "more voodoo CB terminology" Why don't you google "bird watts"? You'll get more hits than "line flattener". ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
On 31 Jul 2005 06:12:17 -0700, "Professor"
wrote in .com: I certainly agree with John... the matchbox is not a bad way to go. Frank, as usual... you are unecessarily negative... and wrong. Such a remark doesn't mean much coming from someone who built and sold hacked amps that he claimed were "linear" but were biased Class C, then defends his ignorance by claiming that linearity isn't required. BTW, who let you out of your cage? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:36:55 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote in : tnom: Yep, I always worry about terminology... It will allow you to tune the antenna/coax from a 5:1 to a 1:1 and run your transceiver into it--WITHOUT BURNING OUT THE FINALS. Guess what, John: Most of the finals used in CB radios today (and for the past 20+ years) can withstand SWR of 30:1 indefinitely. And that includes the power transistors used in amps, too. The fact that, that is better than replacing finals on a daily basis may not appeal to some--they can chose to NOT use one and burn out their finals, daily, if they chose... Resorting to scare tactics? Gee, I don't use a matchbox and the final in my rig is just fine. In fact, I've -never- blown a final except for once when the coax connector on the radio end was shorted, but I don't think a matchbox would have fixed that problem..... do you? Better yet, he can drop into the radio shop on board a truck stop, explain he does not have time, or the permission of the truck owners to start revamping their antennas and coax-- Why stop there? Tell him the -truth-, John: If he doesn't run a matchbox he'll have to hire an engineer at $200/hr to locate the optimum location on the truck for the antenna, reinstall the whole system, tune it up with his $20k HP comm analyzer, etc..... Judas Priest, it's just a CB radio! Just plug it in and talk! I am sure the tech will see it as a no-brainer--RUN A MATCH BOX! Once again there's that phrase most favored by those who can't make a logical argument: "It's a no-brainer". Well, since the CB was first established over 45 years ago the overwhelming majority of CBers have run their rigs -WITHOUT- a matchbox and they worked just fine. Sorry, it's not a "no-brainer", but it's about as close as you can get. And if -you- can't figure it out then apparently a "no-brainer" is beyond your level of comprehension. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
This is a line flattener. ....oh brother, more voodoo CB terminology. http://www.rockwellcollins.com/ecat/gs/LF-2040.html http://www.listserve.com/archives/co.../msg00270.html http://www.listserve.com/archives/co.../msg00270.html http://www.co.missoula.mt.us/acs/radios/HF-8040.htm http://www.valcom.ca/Guelph/products...-30_photo.html Yup. Sure looks like the term "Line Flattener" is "more voodoo CB terminology" Why don't you google "bird watts"? You'll get more hits than "line flattener". Probably because I'm not very concerned with semantics..............You need to check your facts before you start posturing and posting. You end up looking like a fool when you're corrected. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx |