LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19   Report Post  
Old December 2nd 05, 10:19 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
DrDeath
 
Posts: n/a
Default Type acceptance of older 23 ch radios vs. 40 channel question.


"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
Being of the mindset that code prevents
cb'ers from getting licensed is your right, but it's not correct and
serves only to illustrate your own difficulty and prejudices concerning
cw.


I agree, back in the mid 70's I started studying code, what kept me from
obtaining my ham ticket was the way hams treated non hams.


The glass is half empty from your perspective, half full from mine.
There is no argument or contention among anyone that amateur radio
declined when the nocode ticket was introduced.


They could give ham tickets away for all I care. All I need is 11 meter SSB
and a 150w footwarmer.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Older Shortwave Radios - Worth repairing? starman Shortwave 0 February 21st 05 01:33 AM
Older Shortwave Radios - Worth repairing? [email protected] Shortwave 6 February 20th 05 09:24 AM
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) Jon Noring Shortwave 103 June 30th 04 07:13 PM
stuff for all hams [email protected] General 0 December 19th 03 07:31 PM
Address the issues, Skippy! Repost #3 Skipp would rather be back in Tahoe CB 5 July 30th 03 07:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017