Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, John Savard wrote:
In searching for information on the Web about versions of ITA 2 as modified for different languages, I came across a web page which noted that, because of the stateful nature of 5-level code... because a garble can lead to a mistaken shift into FIGS case... 5-level code is quite rightly something that ought to be relegated to the past. But why should five-bit code be saved? It made sense when it was the only thing allowed on the ham bands, and there were those cheap Teletype machines offered by various groups. But relatively few have those old machines around, and would they be compatible with any modified system? For the rest, they are using computers, and then does it really matter which one is being used, 5-bit or ASCII? There was a time when the Deaf used Baudot machines to communicate over the phone lines, influenced by ham RTTY, but once they went to electronic machines, the only reason to stay with 5bit was compatibility. By now, I doubt anyone is using a mechanical typewriter for that, so there's no real compunction to stay with 5bits. Indeed, the ASCII world opens everything up, suddenly the Deaf can talk not only among themselves, but to the world in general (now that everyone has computers). Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Modest Proposal (it's called "satire" Roy, well adjusted people embrace satire) | Shortwave | |||
Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead. | General | |||
Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead. | Policy | |||
Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead. | Shortwave | |||
Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal | Policy |