Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Savard wrote:
On Saturday, March 25, 2017 at 11:53:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Black wrote: But why should five-bit code be saved? That's true - if one is concerned with saving bandwidth, which will still be a concern in some applications, no matter how technology advances - one could always use compression algorithms like those used for ZIP files, or, if simplicity is an issue, a static Huffman code. 5-level codes are typically used with FSK or AFSK modulation so there is a lot of efficiency to be gained by implementing a more efficient modulation method. When doing that, you can do some compression as well. Wait. This has already been done! It is called PSK31. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Modest Proposal (it's called "satire" Roy, well adjusted people embrace satire) | Shortwave | |||
Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead. | General | |||
Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead. | Policy | |||
Code-Schmode! Try this proposal instead. | Shortwave | |||
Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal | Policy |