Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 8th 05, 01:37 AM
TOM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

DSSS is nowhere near the best modulation format in the presence of
narrowband
interference. OFDM is far better suited in this case as was shown in ADSL
trials (examing the effects of cable crosstalk). We found the same during
our
amateur spread specturm experiments in Dallas in the 902-928 MHZ band in
the late 1990s where DSSS was far inferior to frequency hopping with bad
channel notching.

-- Tom, N5EG




"Paul Rubin" wrote in message
...

SNIP


I wonder why anyone is messing with these modes instead of doing DSSS,
now that we can digitally-process the daylights out of the received
signal instead of messing with analog filter banks or whatever. I've
been hoping for something even slower than PSK31, spread over an
entire ham band or even multiple bands. I'd think something like that
would be ultra-reliable through just about any amount of interference.



  #2   Report Post  
Old January 8th 05, 01:51 AM
Paul Rubin
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"TOM" writes:
DSSS is nowhere near the best modulation format in the presence of
narrowband interference. OFDM is far better suited in this case as
was shown in ADSL trials (examing the effects of cable
crosstalk). We found the same during our amateur spread specturm
experiments in Dallas in the 902-928 MHZ band in the late 1990s
where DSSS was far inferior to frequency hopping with bad channel
notching.


I was thinking in terms of DSSS on the HF bands, for reliable, long
haul data traffic at very low bit rates. Am I nuts?
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 8th 05, 02:35 AM
TOM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, if anyplace has severe narrowband interference, I would think that
HF would surely be it.

-- Tom, N5EG


"Paul Rubin" wrote in message
...
"TOM" writes:
DSSS is nowhere near the best modulation format in the presence of
narrowband interference. OFDM is far better suited in this case as
was shown in ADSL trials (examing the effects of cable
crosstalk). We found the same during our amateur spread specturm
experiments in Dallas in the 902-928 MHZ band in the late 1990s
where DSSS was far inferior to frequency hopping with bad channel
notching.


I was thinking in terms of DSSS on the HF bands, for reliable, long
haul data traffic at very low bit rates. Am I nuts?



  #4   Report Post  
Old January 8th 05, 04:30 AM
Charles Brabham
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul Rubin" wrote in message
...

I was thinking in terms of DSSS on the HF bands, for reliable, long
haul data traffic at very low bit rates. Am I nuts?


Here's a way to get reliable, long haul data traffic at low bit rates:

http://www.uspacket.org/plan_a.htm

Charles, N5PVL



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Icom IC-745 question (how does CW mode work?) Joel Kolstad Equipment 30 November 28th 04 03:18 AM
Mode for Best Throughput? Andy Knitt Digital 22 November 7th 03 01:31 AM
Mode for Best Throughput? Andy Knitt Digital 0 November 5th 03 02:56 AM
Icom T2H ANI Mode Michael Ko Equipment 10 October 23rd 03 07:59 PM
Icom T2H ANI Mode Michael Ko Equipment 0 October 9th 03 09:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017