Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Charlie AD5TH:
You have performed a great service by presenting the results of K5HGR's engineering and your work. Its educational value is almost beyond calculation. In this part of the world one would need to have a licensed professional engineer (PE) sign off on such a structure. Clearly, down your way one has freedom to innovate without concern for issues that we are required to consider. My goodness. I recently completed a task of a tall tower in a populated area where I had to have design work from the factory's PE, have that work reviewed by a local PE, get permission from the local municipality, have the airport sign off on the height, take soil samples so that a safe foundation could be designed, watch the fabrication of the foundation to make sure that it was done right, and on and on... Course, we do get serious wind up here and it just would not do to kill someone with a tower collapse. You sure are fortunate not to have all of the things we have to put up with and not even have to worry about wind. Do keep us posted. The whole story has yet to be revealed. 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mac,
We had certain constraints to work around such as available guy anchors vs. distance of tower from shack since it is a VHF installation I needed to be as close to the shack as possible for transmission line loss considerations even with 9914. Even though we have over 40 acres the tower needed to be close as hardline was not an option. I am in the country here so there is little building regulation to adhere to or approvals of construction projects. We could and still might add concreted guy anchors although they would give more interference for the mower and foot traffic in the back and front yards and that was a concern of the xyl. The tower has a very low wind load on it with those 2 small lightweight VHF antennas. I know it is very common for hams to overload their "properly engineered and maintained " towers. As far as mating 2 different brands of towers I was on a budget and had access to 45ft of what has been called "Sears" brand and 40 ft of 25g. We altered our design from an 85ft erection down to 75ft as a safety precaution during and after the installation. Yes trees do sway but as the photos show they don't sway where the guys are attached. Our insurance man has added the structure to our list of covered items in our policy so evidently it was OK for coverage. I suppose that no matter how we installed this tower and I so naively posted a photo link there are some that will berate it. TY for your civility however..seriously it was quite refreshing..... -- Charlie Ham Radio - AD5TH www.ad5th.com Deep South 2 Meter SSB Net www.deepsouthnet.net "J. Mc Laughlin" wrote in message ... Dear Charlie AD5TH: You have performed a great service by presenting the results of K5HGR's engineering and your work. Its educational value is almost beyond calculation. In this part of the world one would need to have a licensed professional engineer (PE) sign off on such a structure. Clearly, down your way one has freedom to innovate without concern for issues that we are required to consider. My goodness. I recently completed a task of a tall tower in a populated area where I had to have design work from the factory's PE, have that work reviewed by a local PE, get permission from the local municipality, have the airport sign off on the height, take soil samples so that a safe foundation could be designed, watch the fabrication of the foundation to make sure that it was done right, and on and on... Course, we do get serious wind up here and it just would not do to kill someone with a tower collapse. You sure are fortunate not to have all of the things we have to put up with and not even have to worry about wind. Do keep us posted. The whole story has yet to be revealed. 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Charlie" wrote in message
... Our insurance man has added the structure to our list of covered items in our policy so evidently it was OK for coverage. Unfortunately, your local agent will have little or no input into any damage or property loss claim that you may make -- that is the adjusters and claim reps -- a whole another breed of cat (and not the domestic kind). If you get into personal injury or loss of life - it gets complicated very quickly. Fortunate that you don't have close neighbors. gb |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately, your local agent will have little or no input into any damage
or property loss claim that you may make -- that is the adjusters and claim reps -- a whole another breed of cat (and not the domestic kind). If you get into personal injury or loss of life - it gets complicated very quickly. Fortunate that you don't have close neighbors. gb Yep underwriters are more than willing to add things to make more bucks. Getting the claim later is an all together another proposition. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If an agent, a representative of an insurance company, sells and the company
accepts a property then anything that happens (if fortuitous, or accidental) to that property is covered as long as it falls within the policy language, perils insured against and property covered. The company can't come back AFTER a loss and deny payment because of something not defined in the policy. They can't just make it up after the fact. 73 "Rick Scott" wrote in message ... Unfortunately, your local agent will have little or no input into any damage or property loss claim that you may make -- that is the adjusters and claim reps -- a whole another breed of cat (and not the domestic kind). If you get into personal injury or loss of life - it gets complicated very quickly. Fortunate that you don't have close neighbors. gb Yep underwriters are more than willing to add things to make more bucks. Getting the claim later is an all together another proposition. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John" wrote in message news:Wkmye.61939$%Z2.8135@lakeread08... If an agent, a representative of an insurance company, sells and the company accepts a property then anything that happens (if fortuitous, or accidental) to that property is covered as long as it falls within the policy language, perils insured against and property covered. The company can't come back AFTER a loss and deny payment because of something not defined in the policy. They can't just make it up after the fact. 73 I'll bet that there's "language in the policy" that is sufficiently vague and flexible such that the company can stretch a loophole for anything that it wants. Maybe I'm too paranoid, but the insurance company expects that an insured property is a normal and typical example of materials and construction, and that due care was applied to the design. Further, the property should be in compliance with local existing building codes and standards. If you wired half your house with lamp cord, never got a permit, and have no record of inspection, do you think the company agent should know this by himself? If the loss is big enough, and especially if there's some unusual circumstances (fire inspector's report, neighbor's claims), then the company's lawyers have plenty of room to work in. You may have the utmost confidence in your own workmanship, but, if the insurance company is trying to avoid a $500k claim, all they have to do is say "no." So then what happens? You take the insurance company to court, and they ask you about your experience in soils engineering, concrete construction, structural engineering, calculation of wind loading, welding certifications, experience with lightning protection, etc. They will cut you up into very small pieces. Everything unusual about your property should be defined, and if your agent is still eager to sell you a policy despite your "creative engineering", then I would start to wonder why the agent is so desperate to sell policies. -- Ed WB6WSN El Cajon, CA USA |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Price" wrote in message
news:Ifpye.27243$ro.18610@fed1read02... "John" wrote in message news:Wkmye.61939$%Z2.8135@lakeread08... If an agent, a representative of an insurance company, sells and the company accepts a property then anything that happens (if fortuitous, or accidental) to that property is covered as long as it falls within the policy language, perils insured against and property covered. The company can't come back AFTER a loss and deny payment because of something not defined in the policy. They can't just make it up after the fact. 73 I'll bet that there's "language in the policy" that is sufficiently vague and flexible such that the company can stretch a loophole for anything that it wants. Maybe I'm too paranoid, but the insurance company expects that an insured property is a normal and typical example of materials and construction, and that due care was applied to the design. Further, the property should be in compliance with local existing building codes and standards. If you wired half your house with lamp cord, never got a permit, and have no record of inspection, do you think the company agent should know this by himself? If the loss is big enough, and especially if there's some unusual circumstances (fire inspector's report, neighbor's claims), then the company's lawyers have plenty of room to work in. You may have the utmost confidence in your own workmanship, but, if the insurance company is trying to avoid a $500k claim, all they have to do is say "no." So then what happens? You take the insurance company to court, and they ask you about your experience in soils engineering, concrete construction, structural engineering, calculation of wind loading, welding certifications, experience with lightning protection, etc. They will cut you up into very small pieces. Everything unusual about your property should be defined, and if your agent is still eager to sell you a policy despite your "creative engineering", then I would start to wonder why the agent is so desperate to sell policies. Um ... let me guess ... you don't carry a general liability rider? Or if you do, you were not careful to read the details? They are not expensive, and will cover anything ... and can even cover intentional neglegence by the owner. Every ham with a tower (or a pool, or horses, or a big dog, or ...) should have one. -- ... Hank http://home.earthlink.net/~horedson http://home.earthlink.net/~w0rli |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John (nospam) wrote: If an agent, a representative of an insurance company, sells and the company accepts a property then anything that happens (if fortuitous, or accidental) to that property is covered as long as it falls within the policy language, perils insured against and property covered. The company can't come back AFTER a loss and deny payment because of something not defined in the policy. They can't just make it up after the fact. sadly they can try and then it becomes a matter of Lawyers and the roullete game that involves 73 "Rick Scott" wrote in message ... Unfortunately, your local agent will have little or no input into any damage or property loss claim that you may make -- that is the adjusters and claim reps -- a whole another breed of cat (and not the domestic kind). If you get into personal injury or loss of life - it gets complicated very quickly. Fortunate that you don't have close neighbors. gb Yep underwriters are more than willing to add things to make more bucks. Getting the claim later is an all together another proposition. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your trees will SNAP and your tower will fall down.
Sure, your antenna have little wind load, however, how much wind load is the TOWER ? Please inventory your gear for the ESTATE sale ! Luke Yes trees do sway but as the photos show they don't sway where the guys are attached. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tower Resonance Breaker? | Antenna | |||
Single ground | Antenna | |||
Is lighting nuts? | Antenna | |||
PRESS RELEASE: HCDX Online Log 1.0 released | Shortwave | |||
FS: U.S. Tower TX489 MDPL 89' Telescopic tower | Equipment |