Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Morse code learning software
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 13:18:22 -0700, Spooge Geeko
wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:26:00 +0200, "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote: Kurt wrote: Sheesh, I gotta work harder. Can send well but receiving is a whole 'nother ballgame. Fired up JLMC last night and gave it a serious go and it is indeed going to take 30 minutes a night for sometime to get me up to speed. I was a bit saddened but felt better when I reminded myself I haven't put myself on a timeframe and still need to study the Tech and General Manuals. Passed an OnLine tech exam, but I would like to get a higher score. What speed setting are you using ? I think it may be harder learning at below 12 WPM than above. But I suppose that's bad news if you're aiming for a 5WPM test... 73 de LB3KB, Sigurd http://justlearnmorsecode.com try chars at 8wpm with spacing at 16 You sure that isn't the character at 16 with the spacing set to give 8 WPM? If the character and spacing are not the same it just doesn't sound right. It was easier for me to learn with the proper spacing for the speed. Now days I can copy 5, but it's work. At 20 I hear word sounds which is easy, but I'd be lost trying to copy 8 with a spacing for 16, or the characters sent at 16 with the spacing set to give 8WPM. Every one is different. It gives a better sense of the "flow and rhythm" so its easier to For me it breaks the flow and rhythm, but OTOH you are learning the character sounds . Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com increase speed. Ed de KA9AHQ/7 No Voice, No Vice, Novice :-) and again Thank You Sigurd. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lest We Forget | Policy | |||
Computer-Read Morse (Was Morse Code Binary?) | Policy | |||
Morse code 'alive and well' | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | CB |