Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne P. Muckleroy wrote:
"Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message I decided to make a contribution to the continued use of Morse code, and have created a computer program that makes it easy to learn the code. The program can be downloaded from http://justlearnmorsecode.com If you like the program, please make the URL known to the members of your club and anybody else that might be interested. Also, comments and suggestions are very welcome. Morse is dead...hang it up! I don't know your reasoning for making a statement like that, but no matter what it is it applies to ham radio in general. What do you need ham radio for in the first place ? A cell phone is all you need to talk to anybody, anywhere, anytime. So what are you doing here on the ham radio newsgroups in the first place ? 73 de LB3KB, Sigurd |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message ... Wayne P. Muckleroy wrote: "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message I decided to make a contribution to the continued use of Morse code, and have created a computer program that makes it easy to learn the code. The program can be downloaded from http://justlearnmorsecode.com If you like the program, please make the URL known to the members of your club and anybody else that might be interested. Also, comments and suggestions are very welcome. Morse is dead...hang it up! I don't know your reasoning for making a statement like that, but no matter what it is it applies to ham radio in general. What do you need ham radio for in the first place ? A cell phone is all you need to talk to anybody, anywhere, anytime. So what are you doing here on the ham radio newsgroups in the first place ? Indeed. -has |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
antiquated. It was developed during a time when it was considered a miracle
that we could string wire sets for thousands of miles and (slowly) communicate with a series of "clicks." Then the miracle of spark generators were invented and we were really advanced because we could lose the wire sets and communicate across the big pond. I tend to be practical when it comes to technology. I realize the importance of amateur radio or else I would not be spending my time in here. However, if I need to order a pizza on my way home from work, I don't pull out my HT and patch into the local pizzeria. I use my cell phone of course. But, during a time of power failure or disastrous periods, obviously, the cell will not function. So then, I would use a portable method of communication. This does not mean I would automatically pull out my key and start sending Morse. Most likely, I would attempt verbal contact via an HF mode. If bandwidth is limited, I'm sure I could find other modes to use that are almost as efficient as Morse. If all else fails, I could hook up my lap-top, and let it do all the work--sending and receiving Morse. If on the off chance my lap-top is dead, I could resort to manual Morse at 5 wpm. In which case, I still don't need the stupid Morse learning software to get me to 20, 40, 60 wpm. I have much more important things to do with my time than practice this dead language. Wayne- (KC8UIO) co communicatio "Has" wrote in message ... "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message ... Wayne P. Muckleroy wrote: "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message I decided to make a contribution to the continued use of Morse code, and have created a computer program that makes it easy to learn the code. The program can be downloaded from http://justlearnmorsecode.com If you like the program, please make the URL known to the members of your club and anybody else that might be interested. Also, comments and suggestions are very welcome. Morse is dead...hang it up! I don't know your reasoning for making a statement like that, but no matter what it is it applies to ham radio in general. What do you need ham radio for in the first place ? A cell phone is all you need to talk to anybody, anywhere, anytime. So what are you doing here on the ham radio newsgroups in the first place ? Indeed. -has |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:52:52 GMT, "Wayne P. Muckleroy"
wrote: antiquated. It was developed during a time when it was considered a miracle that we could string wire sets for thousands of miles and (slowly) communicate with a series of "clicks." Then the miracle of spark generators were invented and we were really advanced because we could lose the wire sets and communicate across the big pond. I tend to be practical when it comes to technology. I realize the importance of amateur radio or else I would not be spending my time in here. However, if I need to order a pizza on my way home from work, I don't pull out my HT and patch into the local pizzeria. I use my cell phone of course. But, during a time of power failure or disastrous periods, obviously, the cell will not function. So then, I would use a portable method of communication. This does not mean I would automatically pull out my key and start sending Morse. Most likely, I would attempt verbal contact via an HF mode. If bandwidth is limited, I'm sure I could find other modes to use that are almost as efficient as Morse. If all else fails, I could hook up my lap-top, and let it do all the work--sending and receiving Morse. If on the off chance my lap-top is dead, I could resort to manual Morse at 5 wpm. In which case, I still don't need the stupid Morse learning software to get me to 20, 40, 60 wpm. I have much more important things to do with my time than practice this dead language. Wayne- (KC8UIO) Well, la-de-dah! That's norris code for who gives a ****. I happen to enjoy code. You do your thing, I'll do mine. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne P. Muckleroy wrote:
antiquated. It was developed during a time when it was considered a miracle that we could string wire sets for thousands of miles and (slowly) communicate with a series of "clicks." Then the miracle of spark generators were invented and we were really advanced because we could lose the wire sets and communicate across the big pond. I tend to be practical when it comes to technology. I realize the importance of amateur radio or else I would not be spending my time in here. However, if I need to order a pizza on my way home from work, I don't pull out my HT and patch into the local pizzeria. I use my cell phone of course. But, during a time of power failure or disastrous periods, obviously, the cell will not function. So then, I would use a portable method of communication. This does not mean I would automatically pull out my key and start sending Morse. Most likely, I would attempt verbal contact via an HF mode. If bandwidth is limited, I'm sure I could find other modes to use that are almost as efficient as Morse. If all else fails, I could hook up my lap-top, and let it do all the work--sending and receiving Morse. If on the off chance my lap-top is dead, I could resort to manual Morse at 5 wpm. In which case, I still don't need the stupid Morse learning software to get me to 20, 40, 60 wpm. I have much more important things to do with my time than practice this dead language. Wayne- (KC8UIO) Wayne, I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this, but you really are an idiot. Now go order yourself a pizza with your HF voice rig or something. You're clearly a very efficient guy, so why waste your time arguing about a technology that you don't want to spend any time on ? 73 de LB3KB, Sigurd |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne P. Muckleroy" wrote in message . .. antiquated. It was developed during a time when it was considered a miracle that we could string wire sets for thousands of miles and (slowly) communicate with a series of "clicks." Then the miracle of spark generators were invented and we were really advanced because we could lose the wire sets and communicate across the big pond. I tend to be practical when it comes to technology. I realize the importance of amateur radio or else I would not be spending my time in here. However, if I need to order a pizza on my way home from work, I don't pull out my HT and patch into the local pizzeria. I use my cell phone of course. Of course. There are those however who find using the code to be an enjoyable way of communicating, for any number of reasons. Thanks to LB3KB for offering another good way to learn for those folks who choose to do so. -Has KC6TRC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
very true. the only time you would NEED code would be in EXTREMELY bad
situations -- ie, the world as we know it is gone gone gone. Otherwise it's truly an anachronism. I suppose it's good to have folks who know it just in case of some major MAJOR catastrophe; and there are some people who enjoy learning Latin too, a fairly useless language. So good-on-em if that's their thing. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:52:52 GMT, "Wayne P. Muckleroy"
wrote: antiquated. It was developed during a time when it was considered a miracle that we could string wire sets for thousands of miles and (slowly) communicate with a series of "clicks." Then the miracle of spark generators were invented and we were really advanced because we could lose the wire sets and communicate across the big pond. I tend to be practical when it comes to technology. I realize the importance of amateur radio or else I would not be spending my time in here. However, if I need to order a pizza on my way home from work, I don't pull out my HT and patch into the local pizzeria. I use my cell phone of course. But, during a time of power failure or disastrous periods, obviously, the cell will not function. So then, I would use a portable method of communication. This does not mean I would automatically pull out my key and start sending Morse. Most likely, I would attempt verbal contact via an HF mode. If bandwidth is limited, I'm sure I could find other modes to use that are almost as efficient as Morse. If all else fails, I could hook up my lap-top, and let it do all the work--sending and receiving Morse. If on the off chance my lap-top is dead, I could resort to manual Morse at 5 wpm. In which case, I still don't need the stupid Morse learning software to get me to 20, 40, 60 wpm. I have much more important things to do with my time than practice this dead language. And I have much more important things to do than listen to your whining that others may enjoy something you don't enjoy. If you're so unhappy with morse, **** off and let those who care talk about it or learn it. None of your goddamnes business anyway. Do you go out on the street and bitch at peole who drive a different make of car from yours? Wayne- (KC8UIO) co communicatio "Has" wrote in message ... "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message ... Wayne P. Muckleroy wrote: "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message I decided to make a contribution to the continued use of Morse code, and have created a computer program that makes it easy to learn the code. The program can be downloaded from http://justlearnmorsecode.com If you like the program, please make the URL known to the members of your club and anybody else that might be interested. Also, comments and suggestions are very welcome. Morse is dead...hang it up! I don't know your reasoning for making a statement like that, but no matter what it is it applies to ham radio in general. What do you need ham radio for in the first place ? A cell phone is all you need to talk to anybody, anywhere, anytime. So what are you doing here on the ham radio newsgroups in the first place ? Indeed. -has |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gee Wayne....with your standard I reckon you need to dump that Lead Acid
Battery, it was designed way back in the 20th century. And that antiquated Telephone got to go too. Heck, AM radio and FM radio needs to go too. And Television with all that old Analog stuff....Hey how about that internal combustion engine too? Wayne baby....just because it is old, does not mean it is not useful. Have a good day. Dan/W4NTI "Wayne P. Muckleroy" wrote in message . .. antiquated. It was developed during a time when it was considered a miracle that we could string wire sets for thousands of miles and (slowly) communicate with a series of "clicks." Then the miracle of spark generators were invented and we were really advanced because we could lose the wire sets and communicate across the big pond. I tend to be practical when it comes to technology. I realize the importance of amateur radio or else I would not be spending my time in here. However, if I need to order a pizza on my way home from work, I don't pull out my HT and patch into the local pizzeria. I use my cell phone of course. But, during a time of power failure or disastrous periods, obviously, the cell will not function. So then, I would use a portable method of communication. This does not mean I would automatically pull out my key and start sending Morse. Most likely, I would attempt verbal contact via an HF mode. If bandwidth is limited, I'm sure I could find other modes to use that are almost as efficient as Morse. If all else fails, I could hook up my lap-top, and let it do all the work--sending and receiving Morse. If on the off chance my lap-top is dead, I could resort to manual Morse at 5 wpm. In which case, I still don't need the stupid Morse learning software to get me to 20, 40, 60 wpm. I have much more important things to do with my time than practice this dead language. Wayne- (KC8UIO) co communicatio "Has" wrote in message ... "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message ... Wayne P. Muckleroy wrote: "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message I decided to make a contribution to the continued use of Morse code, and have created a computer program that makes it easy to learn the code. The program can be downloaded from http://justlearnmorsecode.com If you like the program, please make the URL known to the members of your club and anybody else that might be interested. Also, comments and suggestions are very welcome. Morse is dead...hang it up! I don't know your reasoning for making a statement like that, but no matter what it is it applies to ham radio in general. What do you need ham radio for in the first place ? A cell phone is all you need to talk to anybody, anywhere, anytime. So what are you doing here on the ham radio newsgroups in the first place ? Indeed. -has |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sigurd Stenersen wrote:
Wayne P. Muckleroy wrote: "Sigurd Stenersen" wrote in message I decided to make a contribution to the continued use of Morse code, and have created a computer program that makes it easy to learn the code. The program can be downloaded from http://justlearnmorsecode.com If you like the program, please make the URL known to the members of your club and anybody else that might be interested. Also, comments and suggestions are very welcome. Morse is dead...hang it up! I don't know your reasoning for making a statement like that, but no matter what it is it applies to ham radio in general. What do you need ham radio for in the first place ? A cell phone is all you need to talk to anybody, anywhere, anytime. Morse is more properly moribund but Morse is not the the whole of Ham radio So what are you doing here on the ham radio newsgroups in the first place ? 73 de LB3KB, Sigurd |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lest We Forget | Policy | |||
Computer-Read Morse (Was Morse Code Binary?) | Policy | |||
Morse code 'alive and well' | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | CB |