wrote:

hard to believe the DoJ will bother with the case anything K1MAN seems
to be accused of is pretty minor in view of the outer world the most
troubling to me is the charge he interferesed emergency trafic


Ummm.. That's not on the list of charges I've seen in the NAL for
K1MAN..

Perhaps you are confused with the guy in CA who interfered with a coast
guard operation?

-= bob =-

wrote:
wrote:

hard to believe the DoJ will bother with the case anything K1MAN seems
to be accused of is pretty minor in view of the outer world the most
troubling to me is the charge he interferesed emergency trafic


Ummm.. That's not on the list of charges I've seen in the NAL for
K1MAN..

Perhaps you are confused with the guy in CA who interfered with a coast
guard operation?
nope I refering to charge he interfered with passing emgency ham
traffic out of Mexico city after a quake

-= bob =-

an old friend wrote:

nope I refering to charge he interfered with passing emgency ham
traffic out of Mexico city after a quake


Didn't see that in the NAL.. Didn't that happen years ago? (Trying to
sweep off the dust on the Mexico City Quake..) If so, it is not what
the NAL was charging him with.

They are dealing only with the offences on Nov 27, 2004; Dec 3, 2004;
and March 31, 2005 which where directly observed by FCC agents.

-= Bob =-