Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() It boils down to code being nothing more than another operating mode which isn't a language and isn't a gauge of proficiency. Unless ........ one is trying to communicate with another "code" station ....... I don't buy the language aspect ...in fact this discussion has been beat to death years ago ...... what is proficient ???? 5 WPM yep it is if you are working another 5 WPM station .... 40 WPM yep if the other fellow is 40 WPM "proficient" ...as stated many times before ....my "proficiency" unravels like a cheap sweater around 40 WPM or so. PS to keep this in the realm of equipment ...... how does the FT-897 act with the Collins CW filter ...worth if for and backup and field day ???? Take care all ...73 Tom Popovic KI3R |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Proof of the Necessity of Amatuer Radio | Policy | |||
FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF | Shortwave | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner | Shortwave | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |