LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 12th 06, 12:40 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3
Default Language, code, proficiency etc.




It boils down to code being nothing more than another operating mode
which isn't a language and isn't a gauge of proficiency.



Unless ........ one is trying to communicate with another "code" station
....... I don't buy the language aspect ...in fact this discussion has been
beat to death years ago ...... what is proficient ???? 5 WPM yep it is if
you are working another 5 WPM station .... 40 WPM yep if the other fellow
is 40 WPM "proficient" ...as stated many times before ....my "proficiency"
unravels like a cheap sweater around 40 WPM or so. PS to keep this in the
realm of equipment ......
how does the FT-897 act with the Collins CW filter ...worth if for and
backup and field day ????

Take care all ...73 Tom Popovic KI3R


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proof of the Necessity of Amatuer Radio Jerry Policy 127 September 22nd 05 03:34 AM
FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF John Smith Shortwave 224 September 6th 05 05:06 PM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner DeWayne Shortwave 174 November 23rd 03 09:31 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017