| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#61
September 20th 06, 12:21 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Lloyd Daugherty wrote: Just like Wiseman, you have to go somewhere else (Charleston) to post. BWHAHAHAHAHAHA Llardass ****s up again! |
|
#62
September 21st 06, 06:59 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
|
|||
|
|||
|
gay bashers are not welcome anywhere that is why they use fake names like Slow Code
|
|
#63
September 21st 06, 08:25 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.radio.pirate,alt.radio.broadcasting
|
|||
|
|||
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. you see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. There's nothing for them to "explain", except to answer WHY it took so long to cuff you! Todd N9OGL SMEGMA SCUM RADIO Here's your buddy MORKIE making a fool out of himself...thought you two would like to keep close company! Message-ID: .com KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy" There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy! Quoted Word For Word! Steve, K4YZ |
|
#65
September 22nd 06, 01:11 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.radio.pirate,alt.radio.broadcasting
|
|||
|
|||
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
|
|
#66
September 22nd 06, 02:38 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.radio.pirate,alt.radio.broadcasting
|
|||
|
|||
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
"N9OGL" wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. you see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. There's nothing for them to "explain", except to answer WHY it took so long to cuff you! Todd N9OGL SMEGMA SCUM RADIO Here's your buddy MORKIE making a fool out of himself...thought you two would like to keep close company! Message-ID: .com KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy" There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy! Quoted Word For Word! Steve, K4YZ hay tood did ur dad trheaten two knot pay teh intranet bill lkie mine do sum time? teh last time daddy pull taht stunt I didnot feed him four amlost a week an taht made him cahang his toon rael quick my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
#67
September 22nd 06, 02:39 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.radio.pirate,alt.radio.broadcasting
|
|||
|
|||
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
"N9OGL" wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 12:25:00 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! he can't prove anything YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. right YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. no I think even ****ed up pieces of **** like Steve have rights OTOH I think you have at least as much right as he does I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. and why not use the avalble avenues as you have done http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com there isn't many "avenues" left....this is it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB hay tood did ur dad trheaten two knot pay teh intranet bill lkie mine do sum time? teh last time daddy pull taht stunt I didnot feed him four amlost a week an taht made him cahang his toon rael quick my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
#68
September 22nd 06, 05:00 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.radio.pirate,alt.radio.broadcasting
|
|||
|
|||
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 12:25:00 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! he can't prove anything YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. right YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. no I think even ****ed up pieces of **** like Steve have rights OTOH I think you have at least as much right as he does I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. and why not use the avalble avenues as you have done http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com there isn't many "avenues" left....this is it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB hay tood did ur dad trheaten two knot pay teh intranet bill lkie mine do sum time? teh last time daddy pull taht stunt I didnot feed him four amlost a week an taht made him cahang his toon rael quick my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ LEAVE Mark alone! K? N0VFP |
|
#69
September 23rd 06, 02:04 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.radio.pirate,alt.radio.broadcasting
|
|||
|
|||
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com: wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 12:25:00 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! he can't prove anything YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. right YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. no I think even ****ed up pieces of **** like Steve have rights OTOH I think you have at least as much right as he does I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. and why not use the avalble avenues as you have done http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com there isn't many "avenues" left....this is it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB Todd, One song I haven't heard on Omega One: "Jail House Rock" You might want to get used to hearing that one. SC |
|
#70
September 23rd 06, 03:04 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.radio.pirate,alt.radio.broadcasting
|
|||
|
|||
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
Slow Code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in ups.com: wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 12:25:00 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! he can't prove anything YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. right YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. no I think even ****ed up pieces of **** like Steve have rights OTOH I think you have at least as much right as he does I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. and why not use the avalble avenues as you have done http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com there isn't many "avenues" left....this is it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB Todd, One song I haven't heard on Omega One: "Jail House Rock" You might want to get used to hearing that one. Speaking from first hand experience? Maybe you can give him pointers in being a prison bitch. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
| ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
| Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy | |||
Linear Mode
