Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio? If
not, why not? If yes, why not leave now? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The code must remain, as we don't need the ham bands becoming like 11
meters. If you can't lean the code then you are too dumb to be an amateur. "tools" wrote in message ... If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio? If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tools" wrote in :
If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio? If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now? No one is going to quit amateur radio because the code requirement was eliminated, maybe a couple might. It's the retards that will flood the bands afterwards that are going to drive good hams out of ham radio. We already have one CB service, we don't need two. SC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: "tools" wrote in : If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio? If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now? No one is going to quit amateur radio because the code requirement was eliminated, maybe a couple might. It's the retards that will flood the bands afterwards that are going to drive good hams out of ham radio. the retards are on the bands you have a license we just want to let people without the mode welfare program you have depended on We already have one CB service, we don't need two. SC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe Bloe wrote in :
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:02:12 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "tools" wrote in : If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio? If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now? No one is going to quit amateur radio because the code requirement was eliminated, maybe a couple might. It's the retards that will flood the bands afterwards that are going to drive good hams out of ham radio. We already have one CB service, we don't need two. SC Hey Slow Code, Did'ja totally forget about the 2 meter band? Oh yea. . How about the 70CM band as well? Boy-O-boy Slow, I tell ya' right here and now, I've heard just as bad "Ratchet-Jaw" or Drooling idiots who think they HAVE to talk on those two bands, (Which of course require Expensive Equipment and Testing with Licensing.), as I've ever heard on the C.B. Right. Eliminating the code requirement for the Tech license was a bad idea and it let riff-raff on our VHF and UHF bands. They need to require passing a CW test for the technician license again, or make the no-code license one year non-renewable. SC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Only Fair" wrote in message ... The code must remain, as we don't need the ham bands becoming like 11 meters. If you can't lean the code then you are too dumb to be an amateur. And... how do you know that I do not know? Is it because I support ending the requirement? You should check your facts before opening your yap. "tools" wrote in message ... If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio? If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "tools" wrote in : If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio? If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now? No one is going to quit amateur radio because the code requirement was eliminated, maybe a couple might. It's the retards that will flood the bands afterwards that are going to drive good hams out of ham radio. We already have one CB service, we don't need two. SC Radio and the world will be far better when you leave. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() tools wrote: you do post a lot for someone that I don't has yet typed a single word |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF | Shortwave | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy |