All Amateur License Classes - No more MORSE code? Wow.

"Hot Guy" wrote:

All Amateur License Classes - No more MORSE code? Wow.


sad isnt it.

now you wont be able to tell the difference between someone who didnt
bother and those who did.

(zpk) wrote in
:

"Hot Guy" wrote:

All Amateur License Classes - No more MORSE code? Wow.


sad isnt it.

now you wont be able to tell the difference between someone who didnt
bother and those who did.


What difference does it make?

Everyone is getting their license per the regulations that qualify one for
a license at the time. Don't hate your fellow hams. This goes against what
ham radio stands for.

If you have a beef, it is with the FCC.

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:20:11 GMT, wrote:

m (zpk) wrote in
:

"Hot Guy" wrote:

All Amateur License Classes - No more MORSE code? Wow.


sad isnt it.

now you wont be able to tell the difference between someone who didnt
bother and those who did.


What difference does it make?

Everyone is getting their license per the regulations that qualify one for
a license at the time. Don't hate your fellow hams. This goes against what
ham radio stands for.

If you have a beef, it is with the FCC.

No, it's with the dead beats who cry because they were to lazy to
learn the code, world wide.

"only thing sad is how long it took and the Damage the ProTest folks
have done to service delaying the enevitable result"
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Exactly. I hope it's not too late to recover.

wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:37:02 GMT, "JOHN D"
wrote:



"only thing sad is how long it took and the Damage the ProTest folks
have done to service delaying the enevitable result"
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Exactly. I hope it's not too late to recover.

I hope not as well I hope we can mange to at least hold our numbers
with the proCoder dying off

You claimed if they ever dropped the code requirement you'd leave here,
Markie, another lie?

wrote:
On 26 Dec 2006 09:24:50 -0800, "Andy the Perv Timberlake"
wrote:


wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:37:02 GMT, "JOHN D"
wrote:



"only thing sad is how long it took and the Damage the ProTest folks
have done to service delaying the enevitable result"
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Exactly. I hope it's not too late to recover.

I hope not as well I hope we can mange to at least hold our numbers
with the proCoder dying off

You claimed if they ever dropped the code requirement you'd leave here,
Markie, another lie?
has not been done yet woger and that only aplied to RRAP not RRAM
where you troled this in from woger

Wrong again, pervert. You see your woger behind every post, don't you,
retard?

wrote:
On 26 Dec 2006 09:36:55 -0800, "Andy the Perv Timberlake"
wrote:


wrote:
On 26 Dec 2006 09:24:50 -0800, "Andy the Perv Timberlake"
wrote:


wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:37:02 GMT, "JOHN D"
wrote:



"only thing sad is how long it took and the Damage the ProTest folks
have done to service delaying the enevitable result"
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Exactly. I hope it's not too late to recover.

I hope not as well I hope we can mange to at least hold our numbers
with the proCoder dying off

You claimed if they ever dropped the code requirement you'd leave here,
Markie, another lie?
has not been done yet woger and that only aplied to RRAP not RRAM
where you troled this in from woger

Wrong again, pervert. You see your woger behind every post, don't you,
retard?
you know who he is he has threatened your murder

No, he hasn't, dumbass.

wrote:
On 27 Dec 2006 06:43:21 -0800, "Not Cocksucker Lloyd"
wrote:


wrote:
On 26 Dec 2006 09:36:55 -0800, "Andy the Perv Timberlake"
wrote:


wrote:
On 26 Dec 2006 09:24:50 -0800, "Andy the Perv Timberlake"
wrote:


wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:37:02 GMT, "JOHN D"
wrote:



"only thing sad is how long it took and the Damage the ProTest folks
have done to service delaying the enevitable result"
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Exactly. I hope it's not too late to recover.

I hope not as well I hope we can mange to at least hold our numbers
with the proCoder dying off

You claimed if they ever dropped the code requirement you'd leave here,
Markie, another lie?
has not been done yet woger and that only aplied to RRAP not RRAM
where you troled this in from woger

Wrong again, pervert. You see your woger behind every post, don't you,
retard?
you know who he is he has threatened your murder

No, he hasn't, dumbass.

sure woger

Prove it, liar.