wrote in message
ups.com...

Lloyd wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:35 CST, marc wrote:
Consider this (relatively) new ham all in favor.

Marc, KD5LUR
[this followup directed only to rram and rrap]

The followups in the original RFD were directed to news.groups.proposals
and ONLY to news.groups.proposals for a reason: That group is moderated.
Hence, I trimmed that moderated newsgroup from this thread, because this
thread is not presently following the no crossposts protocol.

So Loyd is a moderator...

The discussion has just begun, and already you people are incapable of
following directions.

...and already the "you people" remarks start.

Indeed, Mark Morgan is correct that a search of Google Groups reveals
that Paul W. Schleck has NOT been a user of the groups he proposes to
rescue. As a non-user, his credibility will be hurt with the Big 8
Board if they continue with their past behavior. However, the
suggested moderators are not strangers to the rec.radio.amateur news
groups, and that should help immeasurably.

Help with what?

But Mark has an axe to grind and actually fears the creation of a
moderated group. That's one of the reasons that I will file a proper
comment to news.groups.proposals in favor of the creation of the new
group. I would like to see abusers like Mark lose their ability to
destroy any rec.radio.amateur news group at will. Should
rec.radio.amateur.moderated be approved, that will be a group which
cannot be vandalized by his kind.

Will forging attributes be tolerated? Will thread jacking be
tolerated?

There will be no impact on anyone using rrap or rram, because both of
those groups will continue "as is." According to the RFD, the new group
will be an additional group in which noise suppression by means of a
robot will at first be attempted. I see no reason for anyone to oppose
the creation of such a group, and I can see that there is at least the
possibility that it will turn out to be an asset to the amateur radio
community.

So I say, yes! Go ahead and give it a try. Only kooks can possibly
feel threatened by its creation. I will shortly post an affirmative
comment in news.groups.proposals.

Also note that, by posting your comments only to news.groups.proposals,
you will assured that people like Mark can't try out what they call
"thread hijacking." The vandals are powerless there.

Robesin will be powerless? If so, that's reason enough. He's 90% of
this groups problem.


Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional
post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'.

wrote:
On 11 Jan 2007 18:40:17 -0800, wrote:


Lloyd wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:35 CST, marc wrote:
Consider this (relatively) new ham all in favor.

Marc, KD5LUR
[this followup directed only to rram and rrap]

The followups in the original RFD were directed to news.groups.proposals
and ONLY to news.groups.proposals for a reason: That group is moderated.
Hence, I trimmed that moderated newsgroup from this thread, because this
thread is not presently following the no crossposts protocol.

So Loyd is a moderator...

he wants to be inded he so all over this I am sure he is not in on it
and fears it come off and leave HIM out

He is speaking as if he were one. I wonder why?

The discussion has just begun, and already you people are incapable of
following directions.

...and already the "you people" remarks start.

yep

He'll be the kind of moderator that Miccolis and Robesin dream of.

Indeed, Mark Morgan is correct that a search of Google Groups reveals
that Paul W. Schleck has NOT been a user of the groups he proposes to
rescue. As a non-user, his credibility will be hurt with the Big 8
Board if they continue with their past behavior. However, the
suggested moderators are not strangers to the rec.radio.amateur news
groups, and that should help immeasurably.

Help with what?

who knows, not sure even lloyd knows what he is saying

But Mark has an axe to grind and actually fears the creation of a
moderated group. That's one of the reasons that I will file a proper
comment to news.groups.proposals in favor of the creation of the new
group. I would like to see abusers like Mark lose their ability to
destroy any rec.radio.amateur news group at will. Should
rec.radio.amateur.moderated be approved, that will be a group which
cannot be vandalized by his kind.

Will forging attributes be tolerated? Will thread jacking be
tolerated?

I suspect some of the thread is likely to happen althought nothing
like RRAP nothing about wether the forgers will allowed to alter
atrubtes and such I don't think the proponent have thought about what
it will take the stop the constan personal attack and fraud

I suspect they will have their hands full with Robesin, if they want to
do a conscientious job of it. He's a slippery one.

There will be no impact on anyone using rrap or rram, because both of
those groups will continue "as is." According to the RFD, the new group
will be an additional group in which noise suppression by means of a
robot will at first be attempted. I see no reason for anyone to oppose
the creation of such a group, and I can see that there is at least the
possibility that it will turn out to be an asset to the amateur radio
community.

So I say, yes! Go ahead and give it a try. Only kooks can possibly
feel threatened by its creation. I will shortly post an affirmative
comment in news.groups.proposals.

Also note that, by posting your comments only to news.groups.proposals,
you will assured that people like Mark can't try out what they call
"thread hijacking." The vandals are powerless there.

Robesin will be powerless? If so, that's reason enough. He's 90% of
this groups problem.

as I have said it has merit they convince that t will be possible to
post thoughts about the ARS that are critical of aspect of the
service and and I will bite

If they can truly asure us I would encourage you to as well

We'll see. The new group just might become a single, monthly posting
from Miccolis on the number of amateur operators. I wonder if that
will be on-topic?

Lloyd wrote:
On 11 Jan 2007 18:40:17 -0800, wrote:

Lloyd wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:35 CST, marc wrote:
Consider this (relatively) new ham all in favor.

Marc, KD5LUR
[this followup directed only to rram and rrap]

The followups in the original RFD were directed to news.groups.proposals
and ONLY to news.groups.proposals for a reason: That group is moderated.
Hence, I trimmed that moderated newsgroup from this thread, because this
thread is not presently following the no crossposts protocol.

So Loyd is a moderator...

Nope.

...and already the "you people" remarks start.

Dimwits always annoy me.

Indeed, Mark Morgan is correct that a search of Google Groups reveals
that Paul W. Schleck has NOT been a user of the groups he proposes to
rescue. As a non-user, his credibility will be hurt with the Big 8
Board if they continue with their past behavior. However, the
suggested moderators are not strangers to the rec.radio.amateur news
groups, and that should help immeasurably.

Help with what?

The credibility of the RFD's proponents, dimwit.

Will forging attributes be tolerated? Will thread jacking be
tolerated?

You should try reading the RFD, dimwit.

Robesin will be powerless? If so, that's reason enough. He's 90% of
this groups problem.

Haven't seen a Robeson post in weeks.

I think I have. I think you have, too. Notice your forging of the
attribute chain...

Tex wrote:

Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional
post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'.

It wasn't always that way. At one time attribute forging,
thread-jacking and avalanches of postings were the exclusive domain of
Robesin. What you are witnessing now is Robesin's tactics turned
against Robesin, i.e., "out-assholing" Robesin. Don't like it? You've
had almost a decade to speak up, and didn't. Best of Luck.

wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:41:24 -0500, "Tex" OutYonder@up wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...

Lloyd wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:35 CST, marc wrote:
Consider this (relatively) new ham all in favor.

Marc, KD5LUR
[this followup directed only to rram and rrap]

The followups in the original RFD were directed to news.groups.proposals
and ONLY to news.groups.proposals for a reason: That group is moderated.
Hence, I trimmed that moderated newsgroup from this thread, because this
thread is not presently following the no crossposts protocol.

So Loyd is a moderator...

The discussion has just begun, and already you people are incapable of
following directions.

...and already the "you people" remarks start.

Indeed, Mark Morgan is correct that a search of Google Groups reveals
that Paul W. Schleck has NOT been a user of the groups he proposes to
rescue. As a non-user, his credibility will be hurt with the Big 8
Board if they continue with their past behavior. However, the
suggested moderators are not strangers to the rec.radio.amateur news
groups, and that should help immeasurably.

Help with what?

But Mark has an axe to grind and actually fears the creation of a
moderated group. That's one of the reasons that I will file a proper
comment to news.groups.proposals in favor of the creation of the new
group. I would like to see abusers like Mark lose their ability to
destroy any rec.radio.amateur news group at will. Should
rec.radio.amateur.moderated be approved, that will be a group which
cannot be vandalized by his kind.

Will forging attributes be tolerated? Will thread jacking be
tolerated?

There will be no impact on anyone using rrap or rram, because both of
those groups will continue "as is." According to the RFD, the new group
will be an additional group in which noise suppression by means of a
robot will at first be attempted. I see no reason for anyone to oppose
the creation of such a group, and I can see that there is at least the
possibility that it will turn out to be an asset to the amateur radio
community.

So I say, yes! Go ahead and give it a try. Only kooks can possibly
feel threatened by its creation. I will shortly post an affirmative
comment in news.groups.proposals.

Also note that, by posting your comments only to news.groups.proposals,
you will assured that people like Mark can't try out what they call
"thread hijacking." The vandals are powerless there.

Robesin will be powerless? If so, that's reason enough. He's 90% of
this groups problem.


Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional
post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'.

hi steve

Steve currently post only occasionaly atleast in his own name
(anymouses it seems more)

If you'll go back up to "Loyd's" response to my last post, you'll see
where he couldn't resist forging the attribute chain. That Robesin is
posting everyday is a given.

second what has the number of my post got to with anything I have
unaware there was a numerical quoate on posting

Only Google limits the number of postings in any one session.

and obviously the problem exists outide my head as BB sees and len
anderation and few other

Well, I see this sort of thing as a disruption of the group. However,
there was a valid purpose for it and it seems to be working. Robesin
as Robesin has all but disappeared, or rather has been driven
underground to post his bile as an anonnie. Nevermind that Robesin as
Robesin has posted chapter after chapter about how despicable anonnies
are. He is a man without conscience.

wrote in message
ps.com...

Tex wrote:

Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's
occasional
post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'.

It wasn't always that way. At one time attribute forging,
thread-jacking and avalanches of postings were the exclusive domain of
Robesin. What you are witnessing now is Robesin's tactics turned
against Robesin, i.e., "out-assholing" Robesin. Don't like it? You've
had almost a decade to speak up, and didn't. Best of Luck.

Well, Mark has certainly "out-assholed" just about everybody in these
groups, save for yourself perhaps.
Again, using Robesin as an excuse to post 300 to 400 times a week, and to
crap on as many posts as he can is folly. Even YOU should be capable of
realizing that.

Mark is rude. He is thoughtless. Robesin didn't cause that. I could touch on
Mark's obvious mental illness, but there is little need for that, is there?

Roger Leo wrote:
wrote in message
ps.com...

Tex wrote:

Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's
occasional
post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'.

It wasn't always that way. At one time attribute forging,
thread-jacking and avalanches of postings were the exclusive domain of
Robesin. What you are witnessing now is Robesin's tactics turned
against Robesin, i.e., "out-assholing" Robesin. Don't like it? You've
had almost a decade to speak up, and didn't. Best of Luck.

Well, Mark has certainly "out-assholed" just about everybody in these
groups, save for yourself perhaps.
Again, using Robesin as an excuse to post 300 to 400 times a week, and to
crap on as many posts as he can is folly. Even YOU should be capable of
realizing that.

Thanks for not forging the attribute chain in your response. I
appreciate it.

Mark is rude. He is thoughtless. Robesin didn't cause that. I could touch on
Mark's obvious mental illness, but there is little need for that, is there?

Sure, Mark has dyslexia. Too bad.

Robesin was the catalyst for many of the problems in this group. If he
had only been able to apologize for calling Mark a rapist..., and
instead sues Mark (Mark is still waiting to be served). His mental
stability has been the focus of numerous postings.

wrote:
If he
had only been able to apologize for calling Mark a rapist...

Nobody, including you and me, can prove that he is
not a rapist. It's simply a fact of logic.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

wrote:
Roger Leo wrote:
wrote in message
ps.com...

Tex wrote:

Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's
occasional
post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'.

It wasn't always that way. At one time attribute forging,
thread-jacking and avalanches of postings were the exclusive domain of
Robesin. What you are witnessing now is Robesin's tactics turned
against Robesin, i.e., "out-assholing" Robesin. Don't like it? You've
had almost a decade to speak up, and didn't. Best of Luck.

Well, Mark has certainly "out-assholed" just about everybody in these
groups, save for yourself perhaps.
Again, using Robesin as an excuse to post 300 to 400 times a week, and to
crap on as many posts as he can is folly. Even YOU should be capable of
realizing that.

Thanks for not forging the attribute chain in your response. I
appreciate it.

Mark is rude. He is thoughtless. Robesin didn't cause that. I could touch on
Mark's obvious mental illness, but there is little need for that, is there?

Sure, Mark has dyslexia. Too bad.

Robesin was the catalyst for many of the problems in this group. If he
had only been able to apologize for calling Mark a rapist..., and
instead sues Mark (Mark is still waiting to be served). His mental
stability has been the focus of numerous postings.

Robesin claims to be a nurse. Nurses are supposed to be
considerate of those with medical problems...yet Robesin was
cruel and a bully to Morgan without consideration of his
dyslexia. Continually.

But, acting the bully was TYPICAL for Robesin anytime someone
disagreed with anything he said. Ergo, that made Robesin a
classic catalyst to bring others (mostly anonymous) in here to
increase the filthy postings.

The slightest disagreement with Robesin would set him off. He
was/is a loose cannon, firing off round after round of filth at all
those he didn't like (practically everyone posting after a while).

There's thousands of archived postings to prove all the charges.
There's lots of memories among those of us who've been reading
the newsgroup for years.

LA

Robesin has posted chapter after chapter about how despicable anonnies
are. He is a man without conscience.


indeed he is and he is all but elimated except when he takes his
vacation time to flood RRAP

Whereas if he sat on his lazy ass all day, as you do, he could flood the
groups every day, seven days a eek...as you do.