Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
"Katie" anon@anon wrote in message ... "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Lloyd wrote: On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:09:35 CST, marc wrote: Consider this (relatively) new ham all in favor. Marc, KD5LUR [this followup directed only to rram and rrap] The followups in the original RFD were directed to news.groups.proposals and ONLY to news.groups.proposals for a reason: That group is moderated. Hence, I trimmed that moderated newsgroup from this thread, because this thread is not presently following the no crossposts protocol. The discussion has just begun, and already you people are incapable of following directions. Indeed, Mark Morgan is correct that a search of Google Groups reveals that Paul W. Schleck has NOT been a user of the groups he proposes to rescue. As a non-user, his credibility will be hurt with the Big 8 Board if they continue with their past behavior. However, the suggested moderators are not strangers to the rec.radio.amateur news groups, and that should help immeasurably. "lloyd" Hand has barely posted in in the last year I don't ever recall seeing mr cook post here or never seen much of mr Diepenbrock Jim Hapmton is a rare psoter as well Mr Angus I do not recall seeing at all ( i have NOT googled them to check hovere But Mark has an axe to grind and actually fears the creation of a moderated group. incorrect I do not faer a fairly moderated one I don't believ e that is being proposed That's one of the reasons that I will file a proper comment to news.groups.proposals in favor of the creation of the new group. I would like to see abusers like Mark lose their ability to destroy any rec.radio.amateur news group at will. but you had no objection to vadaliizing the ngs YOURself with your non stop gay bashing nor did you object To Roberson eneging in such gay bashing pedohia accusations it is only someone defending themselves you object to Should rec.radio.amateur.moderated be approved, that will be a group which cannot be vandalized by his kind. instead since one th e lessor vandals is proosed as a modert discusion is simply to be stiffed and you are one of the vandal not Lloyd your history is clear There will be no impact on anyone using rrap or rram, because both of those groups will continue "as is." According to the RFD, the new group will be an additional group in which noise suppression by means of a robot will at first be attempted. I see no reason for anyone to oppose the creation of such a group, and I can see that there is at least the possibility that it will turn out to be an asset to the amateur radio community. the possiblity exists I agree but I doubt it So I say, yes! Go ahead and give it a try. Only kooks can possibly feel threatened by its creation. I will shortly post an affirmative comment in news.groups.proposals. good luck Also note that, by posting your comments only to news.groups.proposals, you will assured that people like Mark can't try out what they call "thread hijacking." The vandals are powerless there. indeed the NG will not even permit me to post my comments or to vote that makes the lack of fairness of the result obvious from before we begin why not make a real proposaul and do thing fairly You can't be serious. Why not include you? Because your objectionable and continually disruptive behaviour preceeds you, Mark. Your record with QRZ is one indicator, but the other, and worst, is that you were summarily banned from the very bottom-feeder of groups, the Nim Busters board. Your vote and/or comments is just what a new, moderated group does NOT need. YOU are exactly what a moderated group is, by design, intending to prohibit. You are solely responsible for your bed of thorns, Mark. Now lay in, accept it, and stop whining. Well said! Now Mark, take that! Ha! Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Were the moderated newsgroup proponents just blowing smoke? | Policy | |||
VOTE, Moderated or Free Speech? | Policy | |||
Conversion To Moderated Group | Policy |