"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
... WRONG! It was intended as a joke, Yes Gareth. Of course Gareth. |
My my - five similar replies from Gareth all aimed at Brian Reay;
I think you could say Gareth's thrown his toys out of his cot big style with over one!!!! What's the matter Gareth - are the other big boys picking on you again? Ahhh - diddums! Bwahahahahahahaahahaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!! ADW. |
My my - five similar replies from Gareth all aimed at Brian Reay;
I think you could say Gareth's thrown his toys out of his cot big style with over one!!!! What's the matter Gareth - are the other big boys picking on you again? Ahhh - diddums! Bwahahahahahahaahahaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!! ADW. |
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message ... WRONG! Your comments relating to loss of accuracy are WRONG in your assumption because I am considerng the use of a gravity escapement. The underlying problem is the same. Whatever the oscillating element (balance wheel, pendulum etc) there is a problem with maintaining the oscillation (by an impetus from the spring or weights via the drive chain) and using energy from the oscillating element to release the escapement. The former can be affected by spring tension (hence the use of the fusee in older watches, automatic winding in newer ones, and even the relative success of the cylinder escapement) and the search over many years to maximise the free swing portion of the oscillation (ie minimising the energy taken from the oscillating element to release the escapement. |
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message ... WRONG! Your comments relating to loss of accuracy are WRONG in your assumption because I am considerng the use of a gravity escapement. The underlying problem is the same. Whatever the oscillating element (balance wheel, pendulum etc) there is a problem with maintaining the oscillation (by an impetus from the spring or weights via the drive chain) and using energy from the oscillating element to release the escapement. The former can be affected by spring tension (hence the use of the fusee in older watches, automatic winding in newer ones, and even the relative success of the cylinder escapement) and the search over many years to maximise the free swing portion of the oscillation (ie minimising the energy taken from the oscillating element to release the escapement. |
"Avid D Waltson" wrote in message
... My my - five similar replies from Gareth all aimed at Brian Reay; I think you could say Gareth's thrown his toys out of his cot big style with over one!!!! Yes, it rather looks like he is too upset to attack M3s etc. No doubt he is off 'reseaching' his next "joke". What will it be? "Nuclear Emissions" "dB" "DSP" "Nerves the art of not repairing a TS830" "Slope Detection" ..... the list is ever growing |
"Avid D Waltson" wrote in message
... My my - five similar replies from Gareth all aimed at Brian Reay; I think you could say Gareth's thrown his toys out of his cot big style with over one!!!! Yes, it rather looks like he is too upset to attack M3s etc. No doubt he is off 'reseaching' his next "joke". What will it be? "Nuclear Emissions" "dB" "DSP" "Nerves the art of not repairing a TS830" "Slope Detection" ..... the list is ever growing |
"Airy R. Bean" scrawled drunkenly in message
... idiot rantings snipped Tempatrimmer? All part of the joke, but I doubt that your apparent emotional imbalance demonstrated by your sneering tirade gives you any scope to recognise humour. We recognise humour OK, the problem is we've also been taught not to mock the afflicted. When do you have to report back to the nut house? Not too long I hope. (_!_) |
"Airy R. Bean" scrawled drunkenly in message
... idiot rantings snipped Tempatrimmer? All part of the joke, but I doubt that your apparent emotional imbalance demonstrated by your sneering tirade gives you any scope to recognise humour. We recognise humour OK, the problem is we've also been taught not to mock the afflicted. When do you have to report back to the nut house? Not too long I hope. (_!_) |
"Airy R. Bean" escaped from his straitjacket and wrote in
message ... You may find that the concept of master oscillators in clocks to be "a leap beyond" the credible, but that's an OU degree (6 'O' Levels at best) and an M3/CB licence for you. Your calculations put Brian at least 12 'O' Levels ahead of you. Is that why you're so jealous of him that you have to use sock puppet anagrams of his name? Do yourself a favour, get some psychiatric help if it's not too late. (_!_) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com