Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard" wrote in message ... Hi. I often search for people's web-published homebrew receiver, transmitter, or transceiver projects. Can I please encourage those that design these radios to try to conform to a standard when choosing the title name of your webpages. That would make it better when searching for radio projects. snip I do find that I want to identify receivers only, transmitters only, and transceivers only, and whether monoband (and what band) or multiband, and what mode(s). Perhaps someone can come up with a better naming convention. Thanks. I'm afraid your idea won't catch on, as it seems to make sense( at least to me!). My wife ( also a ham) complained about the time_sink of surfing the web, looking for that unread receiver article.But she decided it was cheaper to read about radios and such on the web, rather than actually buying them and bringing them home. Along with your naming convention, I'd hope that everyone would make PDF's of all such articles. Any websites you would recommend for the high_perf receiver fan???? Mike W5CHR Memphis |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
naming names - DX lids | Dx | |||
New title/license for the "new breed" of ham... | Policy | |||
Designing and naming a prototype(?) antenna... | Antenna | |||
Naming an antenna... | Antenna | |||
FA: yet another Sony 2010, but not named in the title. | Swap |