Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Jerry Stuckle
writes On 6/20/2014 3:54 AM, Brian Reay wrote: Michael Black wrote: I seem to recall from early articles about surface mount the suggestion of using a dab of flux to hold the component in place. It was only to hold it until you actually had something soldered. That said, I really think a good magnifiying glass or microscope makes sense. I was trying to figure out something, and got out the jeweller's loupe, and it's amazing how much bigger everything is. That's not going to work for soldering, but getting good magnification that will stand on its own is bound to help a lot. And good lighting. Looking at that board with the loupe almost makes the idea of soldering surface mount within my capability. Michael, For SMD projects, rather than repairs, you can use a domestic oven to solder the boards. Ideally, get a small table top model (the type of thing student or caravaners use) but I did a test run in a full sized kitchen one. The key thing is to be able to get to 230C or so at least. You need to plot a graph of the way the oven temp rises using a thermocouple (I borrowed one but they are cheap enough to buy). Basically you put the board it with all the components held in place by solder paste. Set the temp to about 200C and watch as it rises. When it gets to 100, turn oven off for 3 min, this is known as drying time and is to drive the solvent from the solder paste, them set temp to 250 or as high as you can if lower. Now watch carefully, as soon as the solder paste melts and flows to make the joints, turn off the oven and open the door. I've tried this a couple of times and the results are surprisingly good. No dry joints, no moved components. The graph will help you predict when things are about to 'happen' and the thermocouple is essential if your oven temp. gauge isn't accurate. Brian, I hadn't heard of using a domestic oven like this. It sounds like an interesting idea. But wouldn't it be a bit hard on the components? I wouldn't think many would like being heated his hot. The commercial assembly lines I've seen use robot soldering irons instead of heating the entire board. Don't they often use a blast of hot air? -- Ian |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I hadn't heard of using a domestic oven like this. It sounds like an interesting idea. But wouldn't it be a bit hard on the components? I wouldn't think many would like being heated his hot. The commercial assembly lines I've seen use robot soldering irons instead of heating the entire board. I ahve never heard of a line usiung robot soldering irons!! It would be far too slow. Lines normally use either wave soldering or IR reflow. Jeff |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/20/2014 8:01 AM, Jeff wrote:
I hadn't heard of using a domestic oven like this. It sounds like an interesting idea. But wouldn't it be a bit hard on the components? I wouldn't think many would like being heated his hot. The commercial assembly lines I've seen use robot soldering irons instead of heating the entire board. I ahve never heard of a line usiung robot soldering irons!! It would be far too slow. Lines normally use either wave soldering or IR reflow. Jeff Jeff, You'd be surprised how quickly a robot soldering iron makes a connection - less than 1/2 second per connection (and, of course, you can have multiple irons working on the same board simultaneously, with proper programming). The first time I saw it was back in the 70's, but I'm sure it was in use long before that. Yes, it's slower than wave or IR reflow. But it's a proven technology which has been around for decades and does have its uses - i.e. temperature-sensitive components which can't handle the heat of wave or IR reflow. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/20/2014 7:45 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Jerry Stuckle writes On 6/20/2014 3:54 AM, Brian Reay wrote: Michael Black wrote: I seem to recall from early articles about surface mount the suggestion of using a dab of flux to hold the component in place. It was only to hold it until you actually had something soldered. That said, I really think a good magnifiying glass or microscope makes sense. I was trying to figure out something, and got out the jeweller's loupe, and it's amazing how much bigger everything is. That's not going to work for soldering, but getting good magnification that will stand on its own is bound to help a lot. And good lighting. Looking at that board with the loupe almost makes the idea of soldering surface mount within my capability. Michael, For SMD projects, rather than repairs, you can use a domestic oven to solder the boards. Ideally, get a small table top model (the type of thing student or caravaners use) but I did a test run in a full sized kitchen one. The key thing is to be able to get to 230C or so at least. You need to plot a graph of the way the oven temp rises using a thermocouple (I borrowed one but they are cheap enough to buy). Basically you put the board it with all the components held in place by solder paste. Set the temp to about 200C and watch as it rises. When it gets to 100, turn oven off for 3 min, this is known as drying time and is to drive the solvent from the solder paste, them set temp to 250 or as high as you can if lower. Now watch carefully, as soon as the solder paste melts and flows to make the joints, turn off the oven and open the door. I've tried this a couple of times and the results are surprisingly good. No dry joints, no moved components. The graph will help you predict when things are about to 'happen' and the thermocouple is essential if your oven temp. gauge isn't accurate. Brian, I hadn't heard of using a domestic oven like this. It sounds like an interesting idea. But wouldn't it be a bit hard on the components? I wouldn't think many would like being heated his hot. The commercial assembly lines I've seen use robot soldering irons instead of heating the entire board. Don't they often use a blast of hot air? No, the ones I've seen actually have a hot tip. A quick touch is all it needs; in operation it looks like a sewing machine. The biggest advantage is the connection gets hot, but the part doesn't, due to the short contact time. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
... On 6/20/2014 8:01 AM, Jeff wrote: I hadn't heard of using a domestic oven like this. It sounds like an interesting idea. But wouldn't it be a bit hard on the components? I wouldn't think many would like being heated his hot. The commercial assembly lines I've seen use robot soldering irons instead of heating the entire board. I ahve never heard of a line usiung robot soldering irons!! It would be far too slow. Lines normally use either wave soldering or IR reflow. You'd be surprised how quickly a robot soldering iron makes a connection - less than 1/2 second per connection (and, of course, you can have multiple irons working on the same board simultaneously, with proper programming). The first time I saw it was back in the 70's, but I'm sure it was in use long before that. Yes, it's slower than wave or IR reflow. But it's a proven technology which has been around for decades and does have its uses - i.e. temperature-sensitive components which can't handle the heat of wave or IR reflow. And back in the 1980s on some Perkin-Elmer processor cards, the whole card was wired automatically, without there being an underlying PCB |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-06-20 11:02:44 +0000, Jerry Stuckle said:
On 6/20/2014 3:54 AM, Brian Reay wrote: Michael Black wrote: I seem to recall from early articles about surface mount the suggestion of using a dab of flux to hold the component in place. It was only to hold it until you actually had something soldered. That said, I really think a good magnifiying glass or microscope makes sense. I was trying to figure out something, and got out the jeweller's loupe, and it's amazing how much bigger everything is. That's not going to work for soldering, but getting good magnification that will stand on its own is bound to help a lot. And good lighting. Looking at that board with the loupe almost makes the idea of soldering surface mount within my capability. Michael, For SMD projects, rather than repairs, you can use a domestic oven to solder the boards. Ideally, get a small table top model (the type of thing student or caravaners use) but I did a test run in a full sized kitchen one. The key thing is to be able to get to 230C or so at least. You need to plot a graph of the way the oven temp rises using a thermocouple (I borrowed one but they are cheap enough to buy). Basically you put the board it with all the components held in place by solder paste. Set the temp to about 200C and watch as it rises. When it gets to 100, turn oven off for 3 min, this is known as drying time and is to drive the solvent from the solder paste, them set temp to 250 or as high as you can if lower. Now watch carefully, as soon as the solder paste melts and flows to make the joints, turn off the oven and open the door. I've tried this a couple of times and the results are surprisingly good. No dry joints, no moved components. The graph will help you predict when things are about to 'happen' and the thermocouple is essential if your oven temp. gauge isn't accurate. Brian, I hadn't heard of using a domestic oven like this. It sounds like an interesting idea. But wouldn't it be a bit hard on the components? I wouldn't think many would like being heated his hot. The commercial assembly lines I've seen use robot soldering irons instead of heating the entire board. I believe stencilling on solder paste, robot placement of components, and melting the whole board in a reflow-like process with an accurately controlled temperature vs. time profile is pretty standard for complicated multilayer boards nowadays. -- Percy Picacity |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/20/2014 10:05 AM, Percy Picacity wrote:
On 2014-06-20 11:02:44 +0000, Jerry Stuckle said: On 6/20/2014 3:54 AM, Brian Reay wrote: Michael Black wrote: I seem to recall from early articles about surface mount the suggestion of using a dab of flux to hold the component in place. It was only to hold it until you actually had something soldered. That said, I really think a good magnifiying glass or microscope makes sense. I was trying to figure out something, and got out the jeweller's loupe, and it's amazing how much bigger everything is. That's not going to work for soldering, but getting good magnification that will stand on its own is bound to help a lot. And good lighting. Looking at that board with the loupe almost makes the idea of soldering surface mount within my capability. Michael, For SMD projects, rather than repairs, you can use a domestic oven to solder the boards. Ideally, get a small table top model (the type of thing student or caravaners use) but I did a test run in a full sized kitchen one. The key thing is to be able to get to 230C or so at least. You need to plot a graph of the way the oven temp rises using a thermocouple (I borrowed one but they are cheap enough to buy). Basically you put the board it with all the components held in place by solder paste. Set the temp to about 200C and watch as it rises. When it gets to 100, turn oven off for 3 min, this is known as drying time and is to drive the solvent from the solder paste, them set temp to 250 or as high as you can if lower. Now watch carefully, as soon as the solder paste melts and flows to make the joints, turn off the oven and open the door. I've tried this a couple of times and the results are surprisingly good. No dry joints, no moved components. The graph will help you predict when things are about to 'happen' and the thermocouple is essential if your oven temp. gauge isn't accurate. Brian, I hadn't heard of using a domestic oven like this. It sounds like an interesting idea. But wouldn't it be a bit hard on the components? I wouldn't think many would like being heated his hot. The commercial assembly lines I've seen use robot soldering irons instead of heating the entire board. I believe stencilling on solder paste, robot placement of components, and melting the whole board in a reflow-like process with an accurately controlled temperature vs. time profile is pretty standard for complicated multilayer boards nowadays. That may be the "standard" for high volume production where temperature sensitive parts are not involved. But it is not the only way it's done. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Percy Picacity wrote:
I believe stencilling on solder paste, robot placement of components, and melting the whole board in a reflow-like process with an accurately controlled temperature vs. time profile is pretty standard for complicated multilayer boards nowadays. You are not going to convince Jerry once he has one of his usual twisted views on reality... |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/20/2014 10:55 AM, Rob wrote:
Percy Picacity wrote: I believe stencilling on solder paste, robot placement of components, and melting the whole board in a reflow-like process with an accurately controlled temperature vs. time profile is pretty standard for complicated multilayer boards nowadays. You are not going to convince Jerry once he has one of his usual twisted views on reality... I'm not going to be convinced I haven't seen what I have seen. You really need to get out more. Try visiting some assembly plants in person, for instance - instead of relying on hearsay. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle ================== |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/20/2014 1:32 PM, Brian Reay wrote:
Percy Picacity wrote: On 2014-06-20 11:02:44 +0000, Jerry Stuckle said: On 6/20/2014 3:54 AM, Brian Reay wrote: Michael Black wrote: I seem to recall from early articles about surface mount the suggestion of using a dab of flux to hold the component in place. It was only to hold it until you actually had something soldered. That said, I really think a good magnifiying glass or microscope makes sense. I was trying to figure out something, and got out the jeweller's loupe, and it's amazing how much bigger everything is. That's not going to work for soldering, but getting good magnification that will stand on its own is bound to help a lot. And good lighting. Looking at that board with the loupe almost makes the idea of soldering surface mount within my capability. Michael, For SMD projects, rather than repairs, you can use a domestic oven to solder the boards. Ideally, get a small table top model (the type of thing student or caravaners use) but I did a test run in a full sized kitchen one. The key thing is to be able to get to 230C or so at least. You need to plot a graph of the way the oven temp rises using a thermocouple (I borrowed one but they are cheap enough to buy). Basically you put the board it with all the components held in place by solder paste. Set the temp to about 200C and watch as it rises. When it gets to 100, turn oven off for 3 min, this is known as drying time and is to drive the solvent from the solder paste, them set temp to 250 or as high as you can if lower. Now watch carefully, as soon as the solder paste melts and flows to make the joints, turn off the oven and open the door. I've tried this a couple of times and the results are surprisingly good. No dry joints, no moved components. The graph will help you predict when things are about to 'happen' and the thermocouple is essential if your oven temp. gauge isn't accurate. Brian, I hadn't heard of using a domestic oven like this. It sounds like an interesting idea. But wouldn't it be a bit hard on the components? I wouldn't think many would like being heated his hot. The commercial assembly lines I've seen use robot soldering irons instead of heating the entire board. I believe stencilling on solder paste, robot placement of components, and melting the whole board in a reflow-like process with an accurately controlled temperature vs. time profile is pretty standard for complicated multilayer boards nowadays. It is, and has been for some years, in fact decades, even in relatively small batch production. The quality achievable is far higher that you can get with manual assembly- once the process is right. Sometimes things like edge connectors are pressed into holes which have been left solder free on purpose. The plated through holes are designed to 'cold weld' (like a crimp) when the connector is pressed home. It isn't soldered. This is common on COTS boards used in military kit and custom boards in the same LRUs. It is a very reliable technique. Robotic soldering irons are NOT "manual assembly". -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle ================== |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
antenna construction | Antenna | |||
looking for construction article | Homebrew | |||
PVC for antenna construction ? | Antenna | |||
IC-208: easy way for easy install/remove the front panel? | Equipment | |||
IC-208: easy way for easy install/remove the front panel? | Equipment |