Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
RST Engineering wrote:
Well, just for starters, what does Spice say about a 1000 pf capacitor with either ½" lead lengths or a total of 1" of PCB trace at 150 MHz.? It's an inductor? ;-) No such thing as a capacitor, or an inductor or resistor for that matter. They all have to be modelled as networks with L C and R don't they? vy 73 Andy, M1EBV |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
Henry Kiefer wrote:
To come back to your question: Spice will give you better results than your real circuit! Worked much DX with Spice, have you? IMHO if the results from spice differ from the real results then spice is wrong. BTW have you got a realistic model for the self-capacitance of an inductor? Can you predict the self resonance within 5%? vy 73 Andy, M1EBV |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
RST Engineering (jw) wrote:
Agreed, John, 150 MHz is damned near DC for a lot of us, but as yet I have no answer from the "spice" folks for the 1 nf capacitor question. A lot of fancydancing but no answers. Try them on a toroidal inductor, even at HF. I have good reason to believe they won't have anything like a model to predict self capacitance/resonance. vy 73 Andy, M1EBV |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 17:14:15 GMT, Andy Cowley
wrote: RST Engineering (jw) wrote: Agreed, John, 150 MHz is damned near DC for a lot of us, but as yet I have no answer from the "spice" folks for the 1 nf capacitor question. A lot of fancydancing but no answers. Try them on a toroidal inductor, even at HF. I have good reason to believe they won't have anything like a model to predict self capacitance/resonance. vy 73 Andy, M1EBV Model making is driven by need. 1nF capacitors don't exist on-chip (at least not very often , so I don't have a model. But I have built a model of a wirebond that is good up into the 3GHz range. ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
Andy Cowley wrote:
. . . IMHO if the results from spice differ from the real results then spice is wrong. . . . If the results from SPICE differ from the real results, then your model is inadequate. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
Spice is as good as the input is!
Spice is not a Maxwell field equations solver! You can predict within 5% without Spice?? How? - Henry "Andy Cowley" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Henry Kiefer wrote: To come back to your question: Spice will give you better results than your real circuit! Worked much DX with Spice, have you? IMHO if the results from spice differ from the real results then spice is wrong. BTW have you got a realistic model for the self-capacitance of an inductor? Can you predict the self resonance within 5%? vy 73 Andy, M1EBV |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 23:53:38 +0100, "Henry Kiefer"
wrote: Spice is as good as the input is! Spice is not a Maxwell field equations solver! You can predict within 5% without Spice?? How? - Henry [snip] Some of us have done better than 5% prediction BC (before CAD)... like for close to 20 years before I ever saw a computer... and 25 years before simulation software. ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
Sure Jim. I understand you. That was the time where time was cheaper. Once I
programmed a Gauss linear equations system solver on my Casio FX-602P - having 512 bytes and even left one byte (for extensions ;-) It was with minimal input help system (Showing the indices to input) and the matrix was of dynamical order. (Sorry for my bad english) I can buy resistors and capacitors with 5%, sometimes with 1%. If you build a rc oscillator with 1% component values, you get an error typical 1,5%. And then you add the active components with horrible semiconductor strayung values. Of course, it is possible with feedback structures to linearize and stabilize such systems. So, where is the difference between measurement of the component values and calculating by hand the circuit OR setting the measured values in the Spice component dialog boxes? The difference is the time needed and the possibility to make errors. 5% is a real good value for an analog system. Hey Jim - Why you don't answer my second private message? :-( - Henry "Jim Thompson" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 23:53:38 +0100, "Henry Kiefer" wrote: Spice is as good as the input is! Spice is not a Maxwell field equations solver! You can predict within 5% without Spice?? How? - Henry [snip] Some of us have done better than 5% prediction BC (before CAD)... like for close to 20 years before I ever saw a computer... and 25 years before simulation software. ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
The NE85633 bipolar transistor from California Eastern Laboratories
(CEL) ! very cheap quite stable and with a good noise figure. very well documented by the manufacturer! try to fish a development kit of SMD coils from Murata, sometimes they give them away for free. I personally prefer to go with air wound inductors, they're better and quite small at these frequencies. Saandy 4Z5KS |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
Thanks Saandy! I knew CEL but forget them ;-)
Seems the NE85633 is really cheap and good performance. The package is reasoable for hobbyists. Do you already converted the parameters to spice and is it possible to provide the file to me? Thank you! Should be a good oscillator and all-purpose amp... Sure, plain wire is better than the manufactured coils if possible to apply. cu - Henry "Saandy , 4Z5KS" schrieb im Newsbeitrag oups.com... The NE85633 bipolar transistor from California Eastern Laboratories (CEL) ! very cheap quite stable and with a good noise figure. very well documented by the manufacturer! try to fish a development kit of SMD coils from Murata, sometimes they give them away for free. I personally prefer to go with air wound inductors, they're better and quite small at these frequencies. Saandy 4Z5KS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
this message is for keyclowns selling amps on ebay | CB | |||
Shunt feedback in broadband RF amps | Homebrew | |||
Low noise -- op amps | Homebrew | |||
Go Amps Go | CB | |||
FCC to make CB Amps Legal again! | Policy |