Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
Agreed, John, 150 MHz is damned near DC for a lot of us, but as yet I have
no answer from the "spice" folks for the 1 nf capacitor question. A lot of fancydancing but no answers. Jim "John Larkin" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:55:26 -0800, "RST Engineering" wrote: Well, just for starters, what does Spice say about a 1000 pf capacitor with either ½" lead lengths or a total of 1" of PCB trace at 150 MHz.? Jim When they matter, just poke in the appropriate series L or a bit of transmission line. I use Spice now and then to sim picosecond stuff. Even if the simulation isn't highly accurate, it helps train your instincts, shows you which parasitics will have which effects, so when you build the real thing you have a jump on the complexity. Hell, 150 MHz is slow. John |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
"RST Engineering \(jw\)" writes:
Agreed, John, 150 MHz is damned near DC for a lot of us, but as yet I have no answer from the "spice" folks for the 1 nf capacitor question. A lot of fancydancing but no answers. I am not an expert, but can you not just add a bit of series L to approximate this? Or even transmission line for higher frequencies / longer tracks. I have had surprisingly good results simulating a single transistor UHF oscillator at ~500MHz. The results agreed with reality quite well, even *without* explicitly modelling all the parasitics. Certainly spice was better than me at predicting what would happen (although that is not saying much!) I guess perhaps the reason that I could get away with this was because of the small size and high performance of SMT parts these days. -- John Devereux |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
jw\ wrote...
Agreed, John, 150 MHz is damned near DC for a lot of us, but as yet I have no answer from the "spice" folks for the 1 nf capacitor question. A lot of fancydancing but no answers. Spice, smice. You got good answers. Wake up, spice is just an engine to run your component models in circuits of your making. Once one gets beyond the "toy" level of using spice it becomes necessary to vet and complete the models of all your critical components, including parasitic circuit elements. Want a good RF capacitor model, you do well to make it yourself, from the manufacturer's data and info, and from your understanding of the part, aided by theory and bench measurements. Then vet your model with more bench measurements. Thinking about component leads and PCB wiring? Hey, you need to explicitly add all these into your circuit. Just don't blame any resulting shortcomings on "spice." -- Thanks, - Win |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
RST Engineering (jw) wrote:
Agreed, John, 150 MHz is damned near DC for a lot of us, but as yet I have no answer from the "spice" folks for the 1 nf capacitor question. A lot of fancydancing but no answers. Jim I didn't realize that this question was addressed to all "'spice' folks", but was directed only to the OP. That's probably why the "'spice' folks" haven't leapt to respond. Anyone who uses SPICE professionally, and indeed a great number of amateur users should be able to answer the question easily. At 150 MHz, a capacitor lead can generally be handled as a single lumped inductance. The amount depends on the wire's diameter and environment, but around 7 nH is a good working number for a half inch lead. The inductance of the capacitor body itself might have to be included in the model if high accuracy is important. Capacitance to ground, from both the leads and the capacitor body, might also be important if the impedance of the circuit to ground is high. If so, it can be included. The way I'd approach inclusion of the C would be to calculate the impedance and length of the transmission line comprised of the lead and ground plane or capacitor body and ground plane, then convert those values to a single series L and shunt C rather than just directly using a transmission line model -- very short transmission lines in a model can greatly slow SPICE calculations unless there are also other very short time constants involved. On the other hand, if the "leads" are PC traces over a ground plane, shunt capacitance will be higher, and the approach I mentioned with the transmission line is the way I'd always do it. The model for the leads would include both L and C. As an example, if the "lead" is a .010" trace on .032" FR4 material (er ~ 5) over a ground plane, it makes a transmission line of Z0 = 105 ohms, velocity factor 0.55. The equivalent L and C of a half inch of this line are 8 nH and 0.73 pF respectively. Other characteristics of the capacitor such as ESR might have to be included in the model depending on the application. You gave a capacitor value in your question -- an ideal capacitor of that value would of course be the other part of the model. SPICE is used daily, as it has been for decades, by professionals and produces strikingly good results in the hands of someone who is skilled at modeling and has a good understanding of the circuitry being modeled. I've personally used SPICE for modeling linear to highly nonlinear circuits up to 50 GHz, where even tiny SMT components were often modeled as transmission lines and every pad and solder blob is significant and included. The results were used in the design of products which have been successfully produced by the thousands and sold for years. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:23:58 -0800, Roy Lewallen
wrote: RST Engineering (jw) wrote: Agreed, John, 150 MHz is damned near DC for a lot of us, but as yet I have no answer from the "spice" folks for the 1 nf capacitor question. A lot of fancydancing but no answers. Jim I didn't realize that this question was addressed to all "'spice' folks", but was directed only to the OP. That's probably why the "'spice' folks" haven't leapt to respond. Anyone who uses SPICE professionally, and indeed a great number of amateur users should be able to answer the question easily. At 150 MHz, a capacitor lead can generally be handled as a single lumped inductance. The amount depends on the wire's diameter and environment, but around 7 nH is a good working number for a half inch lead. The inductance of the capacitor body itself might have to be included in the model if high accuracy is important. Capacitance to ground, from both the leads and the capacitor body, might also be important if the impedance of the circuit to ground is high. If so, it can be included. The way I'd approach inclusion of the C would be to calculate the impedance and length of the transmission line comprised of the lead and ground plane or capacitor body and ground plane, then convert those values to a single series L and shunt C rather than just directly using a transmission line model -- very short transmission lines in a model can greatly slow SPICE calculations unless there are also other very short time constants involved. The problem is the higher the frequency the more second and third order effects are noted. A 1000pF cap at 1mhz is a cap for all intents. At 150mhz it's now a complex RLC. On the other hand, if the "leads" are PC traces over a ground plane, shunt capacitance will be higher, and the approach I mentioned with the transmission line is the way I'd always do it. The model for the leads would include both L and C. As an example, if the "lead" is a .010" trace on .032" FR4 material (er ~ 5) over a ground plane, it makes a transmission line of Z0 = 105 ohms, velocity factor 0.55. The equivalent L and C of a half inch of this line are 8 nH and 0.73 pF respectively. There is a point here where you have to ask is a PCB trace a cap, inductor or more realisticly a transmission line. Each has it's model and they are different. With two sided (or more layers) board the transmission line model is likely the one to use. Especially if your working with VHF transistors at any power level as impedences are in the range of a few hundred ohms on the high side and fractions of an ohm at the low side. Typical 30-100W devices have an imput imedence under 2 ohms ( and Xc) and output in the sub 4 ohms range depending on power. In those cases everything counts and getting hard numbers requires some work. It hits a hard nail on what model to use and when because spice will only give the results you asked for be they real or imagined. Other characteristics of the capacitor such as ESR might have to be included in the model depending on the application. In most I'd naturally assume though at low VHF it's less signigicant than at 2.4ghz. You gave a capacitor value in your question -- an ideal capacitor of that value would of course be the other part of the model. And depending on frequency it may be a open ended transmission line on the etch. SPICE is used daily, as it has been for decades, by professionals and produces strikingly good results in the hands of someone who is skilled at modeling and has a good understanding of the circuitry being modeled. I've personally used SPICE for modeling linear to highly nonlinear circuits up to 50 GHz, where even tiny SMT components were often modeled as transmission lines and every pad and solder blob is significant and included. The results were used in the design of products which have been successfully produced by the thousands and sold for years. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Spice is a great tool. Like every tool one must know how it works, how to use it to its fullest and knowing the tool can hurt you if abused. When introduced to spice for the first time I was told garbage in, garbage out and never assume that computer crunched garbage is anything other than composted garbage. What I've found is that Spice does allow you the luxury of saying "what if" or "how does that affect xxx" even if you are not sure it's real. Allison KB1GMX |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
I know of a german power line corporation who develops Spice models for
their power line test equipment. So it must be possible... - Henry "Joel Kolstad" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... "Ken Smith" wrote in message ... Heck, that can happen before you hit 1MHz. Check out the ESL and ESR of a 47,000uF capacitor some time. For some of the university work I've done, some of our reference papers are from people modeling power lines as full-fledged transmission lines that are many wavelengths long at 50Hz. No simple equivalent circuit model works for them either! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
I don't know why "RST" is so aggressive but I would mention here, that the
really funny part begins if you garbage in and get meaningful output! I like to smell the solder iron but it can be very interesting playing with Spice and see how changing values can and CAN BE NOT have a drastic result in the simulation. Sometimes changes are not so great in result and parts can be simpler made. e.g. changed from 1% to 5% or more. - Henry schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:23:58 -0800, Roy Lewallen wrote: Spice is a great tool. Like every tool one must know how it works, how to use it to its fullest and knowing the tool can hurt you if abused. When introduced to spice for the first time I was told garbage in, garbage out and never assume that computer crunched garbage is anything other than composted garbage. What I've found is that Spice does allow you the luxury of saying "what if" or "how does that affect xxx" even if you are not sure it's real. Allison KB1GMX |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
OK Jim -
I simulated your question in a first trial. Here is the result: approx. 70MegHz resonance for 100pF, 30mOhm ESR and 5nH for the trace. Surely I would prefer smd chips having better results. BTW: I cannot understand why you're so aggressive and I would prefer that the thread will go in direction of my FIRST posting. I'm doing electronics since I was 12 years old and that is 25 years back. I have for example a patent application made and worked in the communication industry. So you can surely think I know what I'm doing. Thanks! - Henry "RST Engineering (jw)" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Agreed, John, 150 MHz is damned near DC for a lot of us, but as yet I have no answer from the "spice" folks for the 1 nf capacitor question. A lot of fancydancing but no answers. Jim |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
You can that simulate as a rc coupled line of a few steps. That works even
for battery simulations. - Henry "Roy Lewallen" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Ken Smith wrote: Heck, that can happen before you hit 1MHz. Check out the ESL and ESR of a 47,000uF capacitor some time. How about dielectric absorption ("soak")? I first encountered this in an electrolytic capacitor being used for generating a sweep of about a minute duration. The capacitor had to be kept shorted for several seconds between sweeps in order for the charge to adequately empty, an equivalent frequency of less than one Hz. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Standard parts" for rf amps?
Thanks Allison!
- Henry schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:20:25 +0100, "Henry Kiefer" wrote: Thank Mark! MC and Maxim is not new to me. I thought on list of cheap, easy getting parts with reasonable performance. - Henry Minicircuits the MIMICs and mixers are of most interest and there are inexpensive versions in the line up. What both offer is well characterized RF 50 ohm port parts that behave well in circuits. For example you can build a DBM, can you say for sure what the characteristics will be from say 2-500mhz? Other useful parts from there are VCOs and RF transformers. Allison |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
this message is for keyclowns selling amps on ebay | CB | |||
Shunt feedback in broadband RF amps | Homebrew | |||
Low noise -- op amps | Homebrew | |||
Go Amps Go | CB | |||
FCC to make CB Amps Legal again! | Policy |