Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 23, 5:37 pm, Michael Coslo wrote:
The 1912 Hams were not put there as a challenge to get them to innovate. That's correct. It wasn't intended as a challenge to strengthen Amateur Radio innovation. Quite the opposite! Hams were banished to those "worthless" (as then considered) wavelengths below 200 meters to get rid of them. Amateur radio was expected to be reduced to oblivion by this move, but in one of those "nasty unintended consequences" you mentioned, Amateur Radio became stronger than ever in consequence. I'm only suggesting perhaps our service, in order to remain a viable PICON entity, could benefit by another similar (but more deliberate, less dibilitating) challenge. Don't get too hung up in the details, but examine the notion from a higher altitude. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2nd generation DRM receiver due out in December | Shortwave | |||
2nd generation DRM receiver due out in December | Shortwave | |||
PROJECT: next generation SWR/wattmeter | Antenna | |||
PROJECT: next generation SWR/wattmeter | Homebrew | |||
PROJECT: next generation SWR/wattmeter | Homebrew |