| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
November 1st 07, 11:35 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
|
|||
|
|||
Forty Years Licensed
"Steve Bonine" wrote in message ... wrote: So it makes sense to require us to know the regs rather than expecting our rigs to prevent our mistakes. I agree with this, but it brought a question to my mind. The new generation of HF transceivers -- the ones that have quite a bit of computing ability built in -- do they have the ability to enforce sub-bands? Certainly they *could* have that ability, since they already "know" the band edges and in most cases won't allow you to transmit completely outside a band allocation, but why not support the next step and not allow SSB in the CW band? This will cause a problem for those who use AFSK for RTTY rather than FSK. The radio has to be set for "SSB" to use AFSK. The effect on the receiving end is identical to using FSK and so is a perfectly legal way to do RTTY.. If you put this as a "hard point" in the radio, you eliminate using AFSK for RTTY. Something along the lines of the "law of unintended consequences". Dee, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| shorty forty (G5RV) little brother | Antenna | |||
| FA: FORTY(40) NOS HITACHI J56 POWER MOSFET TRANSISTORS T-03 | Equipment | |||
| FA: FORTY(40) NOS HITACHI J56 POWER MOSFET TRANSISTORS>T-03 | Equipment | |||
| 60S TOP FORTY RADIO RETURNS | Broadcasting | |||
| Does this Shorty Forty Antenna work? | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
