SeeingEyeDog wrote:
Personal attacks when reason can not be comprehended.
Another symptom of Neo-Liberalism disease.


Funny, but I've always perceived that characteristic as being the
leading symptom of Neo-Conservatism....


And what is 'neo-liberalism'? I don't know what that is supposed to
mean. I'm interested, please elaborate.

wrote:
On 10 Aug 2006 03:08:24 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
from Omega One Radio Blog (http://n9ogl.brownspot.in.my.short.com)
HAMS ACCUSE SMEGMA ONE OF PIRACY!

So what?

You flagrantly violate federal laws left and right and then get in
a twist when you get your nose rubbed in it, PutzBoy!

no evidence to that effet

Sure there's "evidence to that effet", Morkie.

First off there's his numerous posts bragging about his violations,
then there's the photographs that HE had on his website...(The
illiegally modified HiMax...I have it copied to disc...He took it off
his site when I busted his chops about it...Too bad for him it's
archived now)

Take your snivvelling rants to Confession on Sunday...Maybe then
you'll find someone who gives a rat's kazoo about your "allegations".

why?

Because that's the only place Toiddie's likely to find a
sympatheic audience.

They have a special compassion for people like him.

No one here believes that you're only running LEGAL anything,
Toiddie.

definately lying there steve I do I believe that Tood is rmost likely
with the limits of the rules

Nice snip, fatboy...I caveated you...But then you're hardly any
kind of an authority on ANY technical subject other than "bisexaul"
matters.

Steve, K4YZ

an old friendless Cocksucker wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:44:52 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"N9OGL" wrote in
oups.com:

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:13:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:06:15 -0700, "K4YZ"
wrote:
MorkMakesSo
ManyStupidAllegationsNoOneCanKeepUpWithThem@kb9rq z.com wrote:
cease and desist
cease and desist you are libeling Todd now

No, I am not.

yes you are

Nope.

yes you are cease and desist

Nope.

He's blatantly violating federal law.

no evidence exiosts that he is doing so

Sure there is.

In every post wherein he continues this lie about being "Part 15
legal" for "Omega One".

no such post exists legaly and I have have seen now such post that
even suggests it

Try that in English, Fatboy.

you are just trying to proclaim you can measure rf power remotely the
same way you claim to be able to detrime spectroscpy result withotu
a line of sight on me

I didn't claim I could measure anything I couldn't put my hands
on, fatboy.

TrashMouth is the one who stated that he's running 100watts in
13mHz...Not me.

cease and desist

No.

Steve, K4YZ

Again steve, it's not Wattage the FCC is looking at under part 15, it's
voltage and you can produce different wattage at one voltage. I'm
running 100 watts but at 30 meters my voltage is 333uV. If one votage
say 110 volts puts out one wattage, then why do we have an assortment
of wattage of light bulbs?? but hey steve, if you think I'm Illegal,
bitch to the FCC, if not shut the HELL UP!!!!

OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz
100 watts of power!!!


ROFL,

I see a NAL in your future.
for?

For you talking to unlicened stations, Morkie!
why would the fcc give Todd an NAL if I do something?

Learn to read, stupid. You are going to get one for talking to
unlicensed stations.

besides I wasn't tlaking an unlicensed station

You said you did.

or has yours been
revoked?

Go to a license database and see, dumb****!

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
an old friendless Cocksucker wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

I see a NAL in your future.
for?

For you talking to unlicened stations, Morkie!
why would the fcc give Todd an NAL if I do something?

Learn to read, stupid. You are going to get one for talking to
unlicensed stations.
I can it was Todd would get an NAL for some action of mine

besides I wasn't tlaking an unlicensed station

You said you did.
nope

or has yours been
revoked?

Go to a license database and see, dumb****!

well a quick check reveals that No Cocksucker Lloyd has not been issued
an ARS license so, I must assume it was, after all you keep insisting
you are not Wisemen

an old fraud wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
an old friendless Cocksucker wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

I see a NAL in your future.
for?

For you talking to unlicened stations, Morkie!
why would the fcc give Todd an NAL if I do something?

Learn to read, stupid. You are going to get one for talking to
unlicensed stations.
I can it was Todd would get an NAL for some action of mine

Wrong again, stupid, The FCC has busted people for talking to
unlicensed stations.


besides I wasn't tlaking an unlicensed station

You said you did.
nope

Yep. Googl;e has archived the posts where you posted it.


or has yours been
revoked?

Go to a license database and see, dumb****!

well a quick check reveals that No Cocksucker Lloyd has not been issued

Very good, dumbass. Did I ever say I had a license? Or radio equipment?

an ARS license so, I must assume it was, after all you keep insisting
you are not Wisemen

No, you were talking about Wiseman since he seems to be on that little
b-b brain of yours a lot. A check of the license database shows his
license hasn't been revoked. Learn to read and understand, dumbass.

wrote:
On 24 Aug 2006 06:02:45 -0700, wrote:


an old fraud wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
an old friendless Cocksucker wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

I see a NAL in your future.
for?

For you talking to unlicened stations, Morkie!
why would the fcc give Todd an NAL if I do something?

Learn to read, stupid. You are going to get one for talking to
unlicensed stations.
I can it was Todd would get an NAL for some action of mine

Wrong again, stupid, The FCC has busted people for talking to
unlicensed stations.


besides I wasn't tlaking an unlicensed station

You said you did.
nope

Yep. Googl;e has archived the posts where you posted it.


or has yours been
revoked?

Go to a license database and see, dumb****!

well a quick check reveals that No Cocksucker Lloyd has not been issued

Very good, dumbass. Did I ever say I had a license? Or radio equipment?
then

Then as usual, you haven't a leg to stand on.