Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 16th 06, 12:52 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 447
Default HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!...N9OGL ADMITS "OMEGA ONE" 100 WATTS, RUNNING WAAAAAAAY OVER PART 15 LIMITS ! ! !


N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

In the past you've stated that I'm violating federal law and again and I emphasis how.

Yes, you DO emphasis how you break it...By pasting your bogus
broadcast station notes all over USENET. No one (excpet Morkie and
he's already an admitted liar) beleives you...least of all me.


Their not bogus station steve, I have recieved a number of request via
regular mail for QSL Cards, the station IS on the air 24/7 and I have
had people from as far away as Canada hear it running a power output of
50 to 100 watts

"They're"

Sure they are. Do you have a broadcast license?

You dont' need a broadcast license under Part 15


But you're not Part 15 legal, Toiddie.


You have yet to prove it Steve....When it comes to Part 15 the FCC is
lookinf for field strength, not wattage...again steve you don't know
what the hell your talking about.


I don't have to, Toiddie...YOU proved it by your OWN admission.

To wit:

(SNIP)

How are they going to hear it if it's running Part 15 limits
unless they live within a mile of you, Toiddie?


Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)


My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.


WHY DID YOU NO ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!

(UNSNIP)...and the electrical field emission a 17.5 meters is 2,000 uV. At 30 Meters the
field emissions is 0 uV You Also have to remeber that 13 MHz is the
22 meter Shortwave Band, which does skip. It it possible to hear part
15 stations on that frequency. You can put out a higher power and
produce the required electrical field.


With 100 watts output and single sideband, it would be
embarrassing to NOT be heard, ToiddieBoy!

their's no law against that. As a
matter of fact those people that had mail me for QSL request heard
about the station on here or the Free Radio Network. The only
foolishness on here is your stupidity

No...YOUR stupidity.

You know what steve your right, I am stupid and a moron, beacuse I have
to sit here and waste a small part of my pathenic life to respond to
your moronic responds


Speaking of moronic, how come you told us almost 2 years ago you
were "graduating" but now you tell us you haven't?


Why hasn't the FCC come to my door??


Perhaps the thought of what they might touch or be touched by is
more appaling than allowing your to think you're a DJ.

And even more moronic is your frequent posts that expose your even
MORE moronic and pathetic life wherein you set up make believe
broadcast stations and play disc jockey to a non-existant audience.

I doubt anyone heard anything you put on the air, Toiddie.

Not true on the Free radio Network, a number of people have heard me.


Running 100 watts, I am sure SOMEone did!

BTW...Got a legit "N" Number on that illegally modified ultralight
of yours yet? Finsih that "Sport Pilot" license, or just hoping the
feds don't card you one Sunday afternoon?

There nothing illegal about it steve, I own a high max ultralight. Hi
Max can be made into ultralight. Despite what YOU might think, And No,
I've moved that aside for my education I'm hoping to get back ito it
next year steve, thanks for your concern.

There's no convern, Toiddie, except you you illegally modifying an
ultralight as per Part 103.

And yes, Toiddie...A 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight IS
illegal.


Whatever steve, you seem to me that your think ever thing I do is
illegal...


No.

The FAA says a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight violated Part
103.

Period.

Not if it's only filled to 5 gallons it not.


Yes, it is...The aircraft cannot be CONFIGURED to carry more than
5 gallons of fuel, Toiddieboy.


It says nothing about configured, it says that an ultralight can not
carry no more then 5 gallons of gas. therefor steve, as long as I'm
carrying 5 gallons of gas it is legal.


Reading on...

That ruse has been tried by many others. The FAA says that haivng
a fuel tank in excess of 5 gallons is prima facie evidence of
non-compliance.

That's the same standard that the FCC uses to declare that simly
HAVING a linear amplifier for 11 meters, even if it's not presently
connected, is evidence of non-compliance.

As long as your not using it, there is no violation.


Yes, there is. Ask the THOUSANDS of people who have had a knock a
the door over the years and had thier equipemtn confiscated.

Don't beleive me?

Ask the Department of Justice.


I guess you're at a loss for words here, ToiddieBoy.

Part 103 of the FAR's refers.

Steve let be the
first one to say, you have the right to opinion and I repect that
right. But for you to come on here and to quote a violations of the
law and not being able to back it up and are confronted with it, then
you should say it is your opinion, and not the law.

I've cited chapter and paragraph on NUMEROUS of your violations,
Toiddie. In Part 97 of the FCC's rules and regulations AND Part
103 of the FAA's rules and regulations.

Citing it and understanding it is too different things steve.

"...is twe different things..."

Just like your use of English words and the CORRECT use of
English words, Toiddie.

and apparently steve you don't know how to spell.

I understand them perfectly well.

sure you do steve


I do.

That's why in over 33 years as a licensed Amateur and 31 years as a
licensed Aviator I've never had so much as a warning, let alone a
citation...I stay legal.


If you feel that way steve maybe you should go back into you box. Quite
harassing us that want to live outside the box.


People like you who live "outsoide the box" in the manner you
describe in yur antics are called "lawbreakers". YOU become MY problem
as a law ABIDING person.

There is NO exception to the use of your HiMax as an ultralight
under Part 103 as you have modified it.

Again Not true, it's only illegal if you fill it up to 10 gallons,
Filling it up to 5 gallons makes it legal.


No, it doesn't.

Haivng a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight is illegal.

Period.


Whatever Steve


Very immature. Of course spoiled basement dwelling brats like you
usuallly are.

(HUGE SNIP)

Now that I know you've got 100 watts output, I'd have to be crazy
to think no one could hear you, Toiddie, unless you were running that
into a buried dummyload.


Again steve when it comes to Part 15 the FCC is looking for Electrical
field stength not wattage.


You'd have to be a complete idiot to only NOT be radiating more
than Part 15 levels with 100 watts output at that frequency,
Toiddie....Now if you were operating in the 1750 meter band, I could
understand that kind of power loss.

Are YOU going to tell me that YOU, a General Class Amateur
licensee are INTENTIONALLY operting with those kinds of losses...?!?!?

(MORE SNIPPAGE)

Manufacture?? I didn't produce it, it was done by some guy in Canada. I
have no way of producing Podcast some bullheaded moron had me kicked
off the internet twice.


Who's the moron?

The guy who got you kicked off, or YOU for providing the evidence
that you were NOT in compliance with your Terms of Service...?!?!

No ISP is going to boot you unless the evidence is conclusive.
They certainly don't want to get sued for such an act, and they only do
such things when there's overwhelming proof.


An internet service provider is ammune from being sue by what their
user post on third party systems...Read the CDA of 1996...BTW the State
of illinois is now somewhat involved with this:


"immune"...collegeboy.

I am sure that you've snivvelled to anyone who would listen...

Too bad you didn't just clean up your language in the first place,
which I see in the last couple of posts that you've done now...Too bad
you didn't LEARN before you got shut down the FIRST time.

And Toiddie...No law prevents ANYone from suing if there is
adequate reason to do so. Any lawyer worth his/her salt could have not
only gotten you back on with your original ISP, but probably gotten you
free service for a long, long time.

Soooooooooo.....Seems the moron is YOU, ToiddieBoy.,


Yes Steve, I am beacuse I keep talking to a half ### moron


Ooooops....There you go agaian with the profanity...Working on
getting booted THREE times, Toiddie? Each subsequent boot makes it
easier to justify to the next ISP that you're deserving of punitive
action.

You've already claimed "pirate" status on other occassions, and I
have no doubt that "Omega One" is ANYTHING but LEGAL!


Sure it Steve, but a appliance user like you knows nothing of Part 15
rules and regulations.


Speaking of appliances, ToiddieBoy, you were throwing that term
around here over a year ago, and when tasked to describe the line-up at
N9OGL, all you had was excuses.

I have no doubt in my mind that other than PL-259's and the
occassional battery connector or panel light, there's not one single
scratch built radio in your house...At least not one built by YOU!


Steve I've built a number of things, I pretty good with a soldering
iron, the reason that I don't tell you what I've done is that I don't
have to prove myself to you or anyone.


Yes, you do.

You have shot your mouth off about evryone else being an
"appliance operator" in the same manner you'd make an "expletive" about
thier maternal parent's intimacies with animals, Toiddie.

I say there's nothing more "homebrew" about any aspect of N9OGL or
any bootleg broadcast station you're running than the PL259's, or
perhaps the occassional dipole.

Not true Steve, the station IS legal and you and the FCC is more then
welcome to come check the field strength at 30 meter (98/99 feet) from
the antenna and you will see I'm in compliance with part 15

OkiDokie. I'll jump right on that.

sure you will you've claimed that you complained to FCC for a year know
yet, I have not recieved anything from them...hmmm and you call me a
liar....suire you will steve....as they say steve good luck in the
contest.


More inadequate use of the language there, ToiddieBoy, but now
that we have your admission that your broadcast station on 22 meters is
running 100 watts output, maybe we'll drop Mr H a note.

Again the FCC looks for electrical field strength, not wattage....you
can put out 100 watts and still have a electrical field strength that
complies with part 15....but a dumb### like you don't seem to
understand that. Go for why your at it, since your buddies with
hollingworth tell him, I said you and him should eat #### and die!
Free Speech Supressors!!!


This has nothing to do with suppressing ANYone's "free speech",
Toiddie. It has to do with technical compliance with federal law,
which EVERY person must do in the United States.

If you're generating 100 watts of RF at 13mHz to radiate a Part 15
level signal, I say you're an idiot...A WASTEFUL idiot at that.

What TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION do you offer for operating in this
manner?

BTW you will have proven my point that YOU and the FCC are supressing
not only the free speech of amateur radio operators, but the free
speech of Part 15 radio stations.


What Part 15 radio stations, ToiddieBoy?

You've admitted right here that you're running 100 watts.

You're illegal, ToiddieBoy...Just like I said you were...


Sure I am...Moron


Yes, Toiddie...You're a moron.

Your Buddy,


Not on THIS planet, ToiddieBoy.

Steve, K4YZ (LOOSER)


That's "loser", Collegeboy, and no, I don't think so.

Steve, K4YZ

  #2   Report Post  
Old August 16th 06, 01:10 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,590
Default HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT


K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

In the past you've stated that I'm violating federal law and again and I emphasis how.

Yes, you DO emphasis how you break it...By pasting your bogus
broadcast station notes all over USENET. No one (excpet Morkie and
he's already an admitted liar) beleives you...least of all me.


Their not bogus station steve, I have recieved a number of request via
regular mail for QSL Cards, the station IS on the air 24/7 and I have
had people from as far away as Canada hear it running a power output of
50 to 100 watts

"They're"

Sure they are. Do you have a broadcast license?

You dont' need a broadcast license under Part 15

But you're not Part 15 legal, Toiddie.


You have yet to prove it Steve....When it comes to Part 15 the FCC is
lookinf for field strength, not wattage...again steve you don't know
what the hell your talking about.


I don't have to, Toiddie...YOU proved it by your OWN admission.

To wit:

if you wanted to to start talking about reality and the the truth then
maybe you would not be so reviled till then cease and desist

  #3   Report Post  
Old August 16th 06, 01:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 447
Default HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!...N9OGL ADMITS "OMEGA ONE" 100 WATTS, RUNNING WAAAAAAAY OVER PART 15 LIMITS ! ! !


K4YZ wrote:.
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

In the past you've stated that I'm violating federal law and again and I emphasis how.

Yes, you DO emphasis how you break it...By pasting your bogus
broadcast station notes all over USENET. No one (excpet Morkie and
he's already an admitted liar) beleives you...least of all me.


Their not bogus station steve, I have recieved a number of request via
regular mail for QSL Cards, the station IS on the air 24/7 and I have
had people from as far away as Canada hear it running a power output of
50 to 100 watts

"They're"

Sure they are. Do you have a broadcast license?

You dont' need a broadcast license under Part 15

But you're not Part 15 legal, Toiddie.


You have yet to prove it Steve....When it comes to Part 15 the FCC is
lookinf for field strength, not wattage...again steve you don't know
what the hell your talking about.


I don't have to, Toiddie...YOU proved it by your OWN admission.

To wit:

(SNIP)

How are they going to hear it if it's running Part 15 limits
unless they live within a mile of you, Toiddie?


Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)

My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.


WHY DID YOU NO ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!

(UNSNIP)...and the electrical field emission a 17.5 meters is 2,000 uV. At 30 Meters the
field emissions is 0 uV You Also have to remeber that 13 MHz is the
22 meter Shortwave Band, which does skip. It it possible to hear part
15 stations on that frequency. You can put out a higher power and
produce the required electrical field.

With 100 watts output and single sideband, it would be
embarrassing to NOT be heard, ToiddieBoy!

their's no law against that. As a
matter of fact those people that had mail me for QSL request heard
about the station on here or the Free Radio Network. The only
foolishness on here is your stupidity

No...YOUR stupidity.

You know what steve your right, I am stupid and a moron, beacuse I have
to sit here and waste a small part of my pathenic life to respond to
your moronic responds

Speaking of moronic, how come you told us almost 2 years ago you
were "graduating" but now you tell us you haven't?


Why hasn't the FCC come to my door??


Perhaps the thought of what they might touch or be touched by is
more appaling than allowing your to think you're a DJ.

And even more moronic is your frequent posts that expose your even
MORE moronic and pathetic life wherein you set up make believe
broadcast stations and play disc jockey to a non-existant audience.

I doubt anyone heard anything you put on the air, Toiddie.

Not true on the Free radio Network, a number of people have heard me.

Running 100 watts, I am sure SOMEone did!

BTW...Got a legit "N" Number on that illegally modified ultralight
of yours yet? Finsih that "Sport Pilot" license, or just hoping the
feds don't card you one Sunday afternoon?

There nothing illegal about it steve, I own a high max ultralight. Hi
Max can be made into ultralight. Despite what YOU might think, And No,
I've moved that aside for my education I'm hoping to get back ito it
next year steve, thanks for your concern.

There's no convern, Toiddie, except you you illegally modifying an
ultralight as per Part 103.

And yes, Toiddie...A 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight IS
illegal.


Whatever steve, you seem to me that your think ever thing I do is
illegal...


No.

The FAA says a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight violated Part
103.

Period.

Not if it's only filled to 5 gallons it not.

Yes, it is...The aircraft cannot be CONFIGURED to carry more than
5 gallons of fuel, Toiddieboy.


It says nothing about configured, it says that an ultralight can not
carry no more then 5 gallons of gas. therefor steve, as long as I'm
carrying 5 gallons of gas it is legal.


Reading on...

That ruse has been tried by many others. The FAA says that haivng
a fuel tank in excess of 5 gallons is prima facie evidence of
non-compliance.

That's the same standard that the FCC uses to declare that simly
HAVING a linear amplifier for 11 meters, even if it's not presently
connected, is evidence of non-compliance.

As long as your not using it, there is no violation.


Yes, there is. Ask the THOUSANDS of people who have had a knock a
the door over the years and had thier equipemtn confiscated.

Don't beleive me?

Ask the Department of Justice.


I guess you're at a loss for words here, ToiddieBoy.

Part 103 of the FAR's refers.

Steve let be the
first one to say, you have the right to opinion and I repect that
right. But for you to come on here and to quote a violations of the
law and not being able to back it up and are confronted with it, then
you should say it is your opinion, and not the law.

I've cited chapter and paragraph on NUMEROUS of your violations,
Toiddie. In Part 97 of the FCC's rules and regulations AND Part
103 of the FAA's rules and regulations.

Citing it and understanding it is too different things steve.

"...is twe different things..."

Just like your use of English words and the CORRECT use of
English words, Toiddie.

and apparently steve you don't know how to spell.

I understand them perfectly well.

sure you do steve

I do.

That's why in over 33 years as a licensed Amateur and 31 years as a
licensed Aviator I've never had so much as a warning, let alone a
citation...I stay legal.


If you feel that way steve maybe you should go back into you box. Quite
harassing us that want to live outside the box.


People like you who live "outsoide the box" in the manner you
describe in yur antics are called "lawbreakers". YOU become MY problem
as a law ABIDING person.

There is NO exception to the use of your HiMax as an ultralight
under Part 103 as you have modified it.

Again Not true, it's only illegal if you fill it up to 10 gallons,
Filling it up to 5 gallons makes it legal.

No, it doesn't.

Haivng a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight is illegal.

Period.


Whatever Steve


Very immature. Of course spoiled basement dwelling brats like you
usuallly are.

(HUGE SNIP)

Now that I know you've got 100 watts output, I'd have to be crazy
to think no one could hear you, Toiddie, unless you were running that
into a buried dummyload.


Again steve when it comes to Part 15 the FCC is looking for Electrical
field stength not wattage.


You'd have to be a complete idiot to only NOT be radiating more
than Part 15 levels with 100 watts output at that frequency,
Toiddie....Now if you were operating in the 1750 meter band, I could
understand that kind of power loss.

Are YOU going to tell me that YOU, a General Class Amateur
licensee are INTENTIONALLY operting with those kinds of losses...?!?!?

(MORE SNIPPAGE)

Manufacture?? I didn't produce it, it was done by some guy in Canada. I
have no way of producing Podcast some bullheaded moron had me kicked
off the internet twice.

Who's the moron?

The guy who got you kicked off, or YOU for providing the evidence
that you were NOT in compliance with your Terms of Service...?!?!

No ISP is going to boot you unless the evidence is conclusive.
They certainly don't want to get sued for such an act, and they only do
such things when there's overwhelming proof.


An internet service provider is ammune from being sue by what their
user post on third party systems...Read the CDA of 1996...BTW the State
of illinois is now somewhat involved with this:


"immune"...collegeboy.

I am sure that you've snivvelled to anyone who would listen...

Too bad you didn't just clean up your language in the first place,
which I see in the last couple of posts that you've done now...Too bad
you didn't LEARN before you got shut down the FIRST time.

And Toiddie...No law prevents ANYone from suing if there is
adequate reason to do so. Any lawyer worth his/her salt could have not
only gotten you back on with your original ISP, but probably gotten you
free service for a long, long time.

Soooooooooo.....Seems the moron is YOU, ToiddieBoy.,


Yes Steve, I am beacuse I keep talking to a half ### moron


Ooooops....There you go again with the profanity...Working on
getting booted THREE times, Toiddie? Each subsequent boot makes it
easier to justify to the next ISP that you're deserving of punitive
action.

You've already claimed "pirate" status on other occassions, and I
have no doubt that "Omega One" is ANYTHING but LEGAL!


Sure it Steve, but a appliance user like you knows nothing of Part 15
rules and regulations.

Speaking of appliances, ToiddieBoy, you were throwing that term
around here over a year ago, and when tasked to describe the line-up at
N9OGL, all you had was excuses.

I have no doubt in my mind that other than PL-259's and the
occassional battery connector or panel light, there's not one single
scratch built radio in your house...At least not one built by YOU!


Steve I've built a number of things, I pretty good with a soldering
iron, the reason that I don't tell you what I've done is that I don't
have to prove myself to you or anyone.


Yes, you do.

You have shot your mouth off about evryone else being an
"appliance operator" in the same manner you'd make an "expletive" about
thier maternal parent's intimacies with animals, Toiddie.

I say there's nothing more "homebrew" about any aspect of N9OGL or
any bootleg broadcast station you're running than the PL259's, or
perhaps the occassional dipole.

Not true Steve, the station IS legal and you and the FCC is more then
welcome to come check the field strength at 30 meter (98/99 feet) from
the antenna and you will see I'm in compliance with part 15

OkiDokie. I'll jump right on that.

sure you will you've claimed that you complained to FCC for a year know
yet, I have not recieved anything from them...hmmm and you call me a
liar....suire you will steve....as they say steve good luck in the
contest.

More inadequate use of the language there, ToiddieBoy, but now
that we have your admission that your broadcast station on 22 meters is
running 100 watts output, maybe we'll drop Mr H a note.

Again the FCC looks for electrical field strength, not wattage....you
can put out 100 watts and still have a electrical field strength that
complies with part 15....but a dumb### like you don't seem to
understand that. Go for why your at it, since your buddies with
hollingworth tell him, I said you and him should eat #### and die!
Free Speech Supressors!!!


This has nothing to do with suppressing ANYone's "free speech",
Toiddie. It has to do with technical compliance with federal law,
which EVERY person must do in the United States.

If you're generating 100 watts of RF at 13mHz to radiate a Part 15
level signal, I say you're an idiot...A WASTEFUL idiot at that.

What TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION do you offer for operating in this
manner?

BTW you will have proven my point that YOU and the FCC are supressing
not only the free speech of amateur radio operators, but the free
speech of Part 15 radio stations.

What Part 15 radio stations, ToiddieBoy?

You've admitted right here that you're running 100 watts.

You're illegal, ToiddieBoy...Just like I said you were...


Sure I am...Moron


Yes, Toiddie...You're a moron.

Your Buddy,


Not on THIS planet, ToiddieBoy.

Steve, K4YZ (LOOSER)


That's "loser", Collegeboy, and no, I don't think so.

Steve, K4YZ


  #4   Report Post  
Old August 17th 06, 04:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 493
Default HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!...N9OGL ADMITS "OMEGA ONE" 100 WATTS, RUNNING WAAAAAAAY OVER PART 15 LIMITS ! ! !


K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

In the past you've stated that I'm violating federal law and again and I emphasis how.

Yes, you DO emphasis how you break it...By pasting your bogus
broadcast station notes all over USENET. No one (excpet Morkie and
he's already an admitted liar) beleives you...least of all me.


Their not bogus station steve, I have recieved a number of request via
regular mail for QSL Cards, the station IS on the air 24/7 and I have
had people from as far away as Canada hear it running a power output of
50 to 100 watts

"They're"

Sure they are. Do you have a broadcast license?

You dont' need a broadcast license under Part 15

But you're not Part 15 legal, Toiddie.


You have yet to prove it Steve....When it comes to Part 15 the FCC is
lookinf for field strength, not wattage...again steve you don't know
what the hell your talking about.


I don't have to, Toiddie...YOU proved it by your OWN admission.

To wit:

(SNIP)

How are they going to hear it if it's running Part 15 limits
unless they live within a mile of you, Toiddie?


Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)

My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.


WHY DID YOU NO ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!


What part of this don't you understand?? are you some come of ****ing
moron?? THE FCC MEASURES ELECTRICAL FIELD, POWER IN WATTS CAN PRODUCT
DIFFERENT ELECTRICAL FIELDS DEPENDING ON ANTENNA, FEED LINE AND OTHER
FACTORS...I put in big letters so you can ****ing understand it.


(UNSNIP)...and the electrical field emission a 17.5 meters is 2,000 uV. At 30 Meters the
field emissions is 0 uV You Also have to remeber that 13 MHz is the
22 meter Shortwave Band, which does skip. It it possible to hear part
15 stations on that frequency. You can put out a higher power and
produce the required electrical field.

With 100 watts output and single sideband, it would be
embarrassing to NOT be heard, ToiddieBoy!

their's no law against that. As a
matter of fact those people that had mail me for QSL request heard
about the station on here or the Free Radio Network. The only
foolishness on here is your stupidity

No...YOUR stupidity.

You know what steve your right, I am stupid and a moron, beacuse I have
to sit here and waste a small part of my pathenic life to respond to
your moronic responds

Speaking of moronic, how come you told us almost 2 years ago you
were "graduating" but now you tell us you haven't?


Why hasn't the FCC come to my door??


Perhaps the thought of what they might touch or be touched by is
more appaling than allowing your to think you're a DJ.


no Steve it's bacuse your a ****ing liar.....plain and simple. You
believe what you want to believe and unless it comes form month it not
true.


And even more moronic is your frequent posts that expose your even
MORE moronic and pathetic life wherein you set up make believe
broadcast stations and play disc jockey to a non-existant audience.

I doubt anyone heard anything you put on the air, Toiddie.

Not true on the Free radio Network, a number of people have heard me.

Running 100 watts, I am sure SOMEone did!


Ahhhh Steve, that's what it really is...You mad because you can hear
the station.....


BTW...Got a legit "N" Number on that illegally modified ultralight
of yours yet? Finsih that "Sport Pilot" license, or just hoping the
feds don't card you one Sunday afternoon?

There nothing illegal about it steve, I own a high max ultralight. Hi
Max can be made into ultralight. Despite what YOU might think, And No,
I've moved that aside for my education I'm hoping to get back ito it
next year steve, thanks for your concern.

There's no convern, Toiddie, except you you illegally modifying an
ultralight as per Part 103.

And yes, Toiddie...A 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight IS
illegal.


Whatever steve, you seem to me that your think ever thing I do is
illegal...


No.

The FAA says a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight violated Part
103.

Period.

Not if it's only filled to 5 gallons it not.

Yes, it is...The aircraft cannot be CONFIGURED to carry more than
5 gallons of fuel, Toiddieboy.


It says nothing about configured, it says that an ultralight can not
carry no more then 5 gallons of gas. therefor steve, as long as I'm
carrying 5 gallons of gas it is legal.


Reading on...

That ruse has been tried by many others. The FAA says that haivng
a fuel tank in excess of 5 gallons is prima facie evidence of
non-compliance.

That's the same standard that the FCC uses to declare that simly
HAVING a linear amplifier for 11 meters, even if it's not presently
connected, is evidence of non-compliance.

As long as your not using it, there is no violation.


Yes, there is. Ask the THOUSANDS of people who have had a knock a
the door over the years and had thier equipemtn confiscated.


Sure they do in your tiny little mine...


Don't beleive me?

Ask the Department of Justice.


I guess you're at a loss for words here, ToiddieBoy.


I'm Still Waiting for the FCC...but again hey your a liar....


Part 103 of the FAR's refers.

Steve let be the
first one to say, you have the right to opinion and I repect that
right. But for you to come on here and to quote a violations of the
law and not being able to back it up and are confronted with it, then
you should say it is your opinion, and not the law.

I've cited chapter and paragraph on NUMEROUS of your violations,
Toiddie. In Part 97 of the FCC's rules and regulations AND Part
103 of the FAA's rules and regulations.

Citing it and understanding it is too different things steve.

"...is twe different things..."

Just like your use of English words and the CORRECT use of
English words, Toiddie.

and apparently steve you don't know how to spell.

I understand them perfectly well.

sure you do steve

I do.

That's why in over 33 years as a licensed Amateur and 31 years as a
licensed Aviator I've never had so much as a warning, let alone a
citation...I stay legal.


If you feel that way steve maybe you should go back into you box. Quite
harassing us that want to live outside the box.


People like you who live "outsoide the box" in the manner you
describe in yur antics are called "lawbreakers". YOU become MY problem
as a law ABIDING person.


No steve people like you who live in the box has no ****ing life, and
it's ashame people like you can't really enjoy life..but hey you go
back it your little box where you belong, leave us REAL people alone..



There is NO exception to the use of your HiMax as an ultralight
under Part 103 as you have modified it.

Again Not true, it's only illegal if you fill it up to 10 gallons,
Filling it up to 5 gallons makes it legal.

No, it doesn't.

Haivng a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight is illegal.

Period.


Whatever Steve


Very immature. Of course spoiled basement dwelling brats like you
usuallly are.


nice...closet dweller..

(HUGE SNIP)

Now that I know you've got 100 watts output, I'd have to be crazy
to think no one could hear you, Toiddie, unless you were running that
into a buried dummyload.


Again steve when it comes to Part 15 the FCC is looking for Electrical
field stength not wattage.


You'd have to be a complete idiot to only NOT be radiating more
than Part 15 levels with 100 watts output at that frequency,
Toiddie....Now if you were operating in the 1750 meter band, I could
understand that kind of power loss.


Sure it achieve Part 15 requirement I do have that loss....you seem to
have a hard time understanding that...

Are YOU going to tell me that YOU, a General Class Amateur
licensee are INTENTIONALLY operting with those kinds of losses...?!?!?


This is Part 15 not amateur, learn that...

(MORE SNIPPAGE)

Manufacture?? I didn't produce it, it was done by some guy in Canada. I
have no way of producing Podcast some bullheaded moron had me kicked
off the internet twice.

Who's the moron?

The guy who got you kicked off, or YOU for providing the evidence
that you were NOT in compliance with your Terms of Service...?!?!

No ISP is going to boot you unless the evidence is conclusive.
They certainly don't want to get sued for such an act, and they only do
such things when there's overwhelming proof.


An internet service provider is ammune from being sue by what their
user post on third party systems...Read the CDA of 1996...BTW the State
of illinois is now somewhat involved with this:


"immune"...collegeboy.

I am sure that you've snivvelled to anyone who would listen...

Too bad you didn't just clean up your language in the first place,
which I see in the last couple of posts that you've done now...Too bad
you didn't LEARN before you got shut down the FIRST time.

And Toiddie...No law prevents ANYone from suing if there is
adequate reason to do so. Any lawyer worth his/her salt could have not
only gotten you back on with your original ISP, but probably gotten you
free service for a long, long time.


Ummm...Dumbass Under a federal Law Internet service providers are
immune for what their users put on third party systems and it has been
upheld by the US Supreme Court.....you sure have a hard time
learning....must be from all that ****ing inbreding going on down
there.


Soooooooooo.....Seems the moron is YOU, ToiddieBoy.,


Yes Steve, I am beacuse I keep talking to a half ### moron


Ooooops....There you go agaian with the profanity...Working on
getting booted THREE times, Toiddie? Each subsequent boot makes it
easier to justify to the next ISP that you're deserving of punitive
action.


Keep up steve and I'll get you for Cyberstalking, which is a federal
crime...

You've already claimed "pirate" status on other occassions, and I
have no doubt that "Omega One" is ANYTHING but LEGAL!


Sure it Steve, but a appliance user like you knows nothing of Part 15
rules and regulations.

Speaking of appliances, ToiddieBoy, you were throwing that term
around here over a year ago, and when tasked to describe the line-up at
N9OGL, all you had was excuses.

I have no doubt in my mind that other than PL-259's and the
occassional battery connector or panel light, there's not one single
scratch built radio in your house...At least not one built by YOU!


Steve I've built a number of things, I pretty good with a soldering
iron, the reason that I don't tell you what I've done is that I don't
have to prove myself to you or anyone.


Yes, you do.

You have shot your mouth off about evryone else being an
"appliance operator" in the same manner you'd make an "expletive" about
thier maternal parent's intimacies with animals, Toiddie.

I say there's nothing more "homebrew" about any aspect of N9OGL or
any bootleg broadcast station you're running than the PL259's, or
perhaps the occassional dipole.


I don't use dipole only little closet dwellers like you do...


Not true Steve, the station IS legal and you and the FCC is more then
welcome to come check the field strength at 30 meter (98/99 feet) from
the antenna and you will see I'm in compliance with part 15

OkiDokie. I'll jump right on that.

sure you will you've claimed that you complained to FCC for a year know
yet, I have not recieved anything from them...hmmm and you call me a
liar....suire you will steve....as they say steve good luck in the
contest.

More inadequate use of the language there, ToiddieBoy, but now
that we have your admission that your broadcast station on 22 meters is
running 100 watts output, maybe we'll drop Mr H a note.

Again the FCC looks for electrical field strength, not wattage....you
can put out 100 watts and still have a electrical field strength that
complies with part 15....but a dumb### like you don't seem to
understand that. Go for why your at it, since your buddies with
hollingworth tell him, I said you and him should eat #### and die!
Free Speech Supressors!!!


This has nothing to do with suppressing ANYone's "free speech",
Toiddie. It has to do with technical compliance with federal law,
which EVERY person must do in the United States.


No dumbass there is...but hey I'm still waiting.....maybe if you kiss
the FCC Ass a little harder maybe they show up...

If you're generating 100 watts of RF at 13mHz to radiate a Part 15
level signal, I say you're an idiot...A WASTEFUL idiot at that.

What TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION do you offer for operating in this
manner?


To compile with Part 15.....Steve stick with Ham radio better yet I
have some walkie talkies I send you...they seems to be more your speed

BTW you will have proven my point that YOU and the FCC are supressing
not only the free speech of amateur radio operators, but the free
speech of Part 15 radio stations.

What Part 15 radio stations, ToiddieBoy?

You've admitted right here that you're running 100 watts.

You're illegal, ToiddieBoy...Just like I said you were...



Steve I'm going only say this once Your a ****ing idiot..and I'm done,
either put up or shut up


Sure I am...Moron


Yes, Toiddie...You're a moron.

Your Buddy,


Not on THIS planet, ToiddieBoy.

Steve, K4YZ (LOOSER)


That's "loser", Collegeboy, and no, I don't think so.

Steve, K4YZ


  #5   Report Post  
Old August 21st 06, 09:26 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 454
Default HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!...N9OGL ADMITS "OMEGA ONE" 100 WATTS, RUNNING WAAAAAAAY OVER PART 15 LIMITS ! ! !


N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


SNIP

Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)

My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.


WHY DID YOU NO ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!


What part of this don't you understand??


I understand it all.

I understand you're an idiot.

I understand that you're a basement dwelling parasite that your
poor, aging parents won't be able to rid themselves of save for death.

I understand that in a fit of rage you made a Freudian slip that
disclosed your TRUE power for your pirate radio station whish is a
quantum leap over the Part 15 limits you CLAIM you're observing.

are you some come of ####ing moron??


No, my last name is NOT "Daugherty"

THE FCC MEASURES ELECTRICAL FIELD, POWER IN WATTS CAN PRODUCT
DIFFERENT ELECTRICAL FIELDS DEPENDING ON ANTENNA, FEED LINE AND OTHER
FACTORS...I put in big letters so you can ####ing understand it.


AND LET ME PUT THIS IN BIG LETTERS SO YOU CAN
UNDERSTAND IT...NO ONE HERE (EXCEPT FOR MORKIE, AND HE THINKS PEOPLE
BELEIVE HIS LIES) BELIEVES YOU'RE GENERATING 100 WATTS OF RF IN
ORDER TO RADIATE PART 15 LEVELS OF HF SIGNAL.

AND IF YOU ARE, IT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES WHO THE "MORON"
REALLY IS!


SNIP

Why hasn't the FCC come to my door??


Perhaps the thought of what they might touch or be touched by is
more appaling than allowing your to think you're a DJ.


no Steve it's bacuse your a ####ing liar.....plain and simple. You
believe what you want to believe and unless it comes form month it not
true.


I believe you're an idiotic moron.

See...THAT was easy!

And even more moronic is your frequent posts that expose your even
MORE moronic and pathetic life wherein you set up make believe
broadcast stations and play disc jockey to a non-existant audience.

I doubt anyone heard anything you put on the air, Toiddie.

Not true on the Free radio Network, a number of people have heard me.

Running 100 watts, I am sure SOMEone did!


Ahhhh Steve, that's what it really is...You mad because you can hear
the station.....


Nope. I don't listen. What coul YOU possibly have to say on the
air that I can't see here?

And if I am hearing you here, it would be proof that you are
violating Part 15, as I already know you are from your posts here.

BTW...Got a legit "N" Number on that illegally modified ultralight
of yours yet? Finsih that "Sport Pilot" license, or just hoping the
feds don't card you one Sunday afternoon?

There nothing illegal about it steve, I own a high max ultralight. Hi
Max can be made into ultralight. Despite what YOU might think, And No,
I've moved that aside for my education I'm hoping to get back ito it
next year steve, thanks for your concern.

There's no convern, Toiddie, except you you illegally modifying an
ultralight as per Part 103.

And yes, Toiddie...A 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight IS
illegal.

Whatever steve, you seem to me that your think ever thing I do is
illegal...


No.

The FAA says a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight violated Part
103.

Period.


Good...You quit while you were behind...Now go refit that
ultralight to make it legal, TrashMouth.

Not if it's only filled to 5 gallons it not.

Yes, it is...The aircraft cannot be CONFIGURED to carry more than
5 gallons of fuel, Toiddieboy.

It says nothing about configured, it says that an ultralight can not
carry no more then 5 gallons of gas. therefor steve, as long as I'm
carrying 5 gallons of gas it is legal.


Reading on...

That ruse has been tried by many others. The FAA says that haivng
a fuel tank in excess of 5 gallons is prima facie evidence of
non-compliance.

That's the same standard that the FCC uses to declare that simly
HAVING a linear amplifier for 11 meters, even if it's not presently
connected, is evidence of non-compliance.

As long as your not using it, there is no violation.


Yes, there is. Ask the THOUSANDS of people who have had a knock a
the door over the years and had thier equipemtn confiscated.


Sure they do in your tiny little mine...


I don't own a mine, Toiddie, although I took a tour of one in
Inyokern, CA, once.

And the FAA and the FCC STILL state that the presence of
illegal modifications, even when not "caught in the act" of being used,
is evidence of failure to comly with thier respective rules and
regulations.

No amount of your pontification about your "freedoms" will change
the FACT that you are implicitly violating several federal laws...

Don't beleive me?

Ask the Department of Justice.


I guess you're at a loss for words here, ToiddieBoy.


I'm Still Waiting for the FCC...but again hey your a liar....


Nope.

Not today...not yesterday...not tomorrow...

BTW, College(Not)Boy...it's "you're" a liar...

(BIG SNIP)

People like you who live "outside the box" in the manner you
describe in yur antics are called "lawbreakers". YOU become MY problem
as a law ABIDING person.


No steve people like you who live in the box has no ####ing life, and
it's ashame people like you can't really enjoy life..but hey you go
back it your little box where you belong, leave us REAL people alone..


I have plenty of life, Toiddie...

And I use a lot of it in order to improve myself with...Such as
using the education I was provided with to properly apply English
grammar to my thoughts.

You should try it too.

And I DO enjoy life, Toiddie...And I enjoy it WITHIN the
boundries of the laws as we as Americans are prescribed to do.

There is NO exception to the use of your HiMax as an ultralight
under Part 103 as you have modified it.

Again Not true, it's only illegal if you fill it up to 10 gallons,
Filling it up to 5 gallons makes it legal.

No, it doesn't.

Haivng a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight is illegal.

Period.

Whatever Steve


Very immature. Of course spoiled basement dwelling brats like you
usuallly are.


nice...closet dweller..


Nope...

And you're STILL in violation of Part 103.

(HUGE SNIP)

Now that I know you've got 100 watts output, I'd have to be crazy
to think no one could hear you, Toiddie, unless you were running that
into a buried dummyload.

Again steve when it comes to Part 15 the FCC is looking for Electrical
field stength not wattage.


You'd have to be a complete idiot to only NOT be radiating more
than Part 15 levels with 100 watts output at that frequency,
Toiddie....Now if you were operating in the 1750 meter band, I could
understand that kind of power loss.


Sure it achieve Part 15 requirement I do have that loss....you seem to
have a hard time understanding that...


No...I understand it perfectly well.

YOU screwed up in a fit of rage and actually announced to the world
how much power you really are using for your illegal broadcasting
operation.

You have FURTHER screwed up by announcing all these "QSL card
requests" you are getting...Just more evidence that you're violating
Part 15.

YOU are the MORON if you think the FCC doesn't have engineers that
understand the technical limitations of Part 15 as opposed to what
you're claiming you're accomplishing.

Are YOU going to tell me that YOU, a General Class Amateur
licensee are INTENTIONALLY operting with those kinds of losses...?!?!?


This is Part 15 not amateur, learn that...


I know it, LiarBoy.

And I know that just because you are CLAIMINIG to be a "legal"
Part 15 operator, your "bragging" indicates that you're technically
incompetent

(MORE SNIPPAGE)


And even more.....

Too bad you didn't just clean up your language in the first place,
which I see in the last couple of posts that you've done now...Too bad
you didn't LEARN before you got shut down the FIRST time.

And Toiddie...No law prevents ANYone from suing if there is
adequate reason to do so. Any lawyer worth his/her salt could have not
only gotten you back on with your original ISP, but probably gotten you
free service for a long, long time.


Ummm...Dumb### Under a federal Law Internet service providers are
immune for what their users put on third party systems and it has been
upheld by the US Supreme Court.....you sure have a hard time
learning....must be from all that ####ing inbreding going on down
there.


No, Toiddie...the lack of learning is YOURS.

You've gotten canned TWICE now for certain behaviour, yet here you
are, doing it AGAIN!

And College(Not)Boy....It's "inbreeding", not "inbreding"...

And FYI, I am from father North than you...

Soooooooooo.....Seems the moron is YOU, ToiddieBoy.,


Yes Steve, I am beacuse I keep talking to a half ### moron


Ooooops....There you go again with the profanity...Working on
getting booted THREE times, Toiddie? Each subsequent boot makes it
easier to justify to the next ISP that you're deserving of punitive
action.


Keep up steve and I'll get you for Cyberstalking, which is a federal
crime...


There's no stalking on MY part, TrashMouth...

YOU keep bringing YOUR mischeviousness HERE...I don't go looking
for you.

Idiot!

I say there's nothing more "homebrew" about any aspect of N9OGL or
any bootleg broadcast station you're running than the PL259's, or
perhaps the occassional dipole.


I don't use dipole only little closet dwellers like you do...


No closet dwelling here, Toiddie...

And if you care to, you can refer to ARRL DXCC award #37,136.

Dipoles and 100 watts served me just fine.

SNIP

This has nothing to do with suppressing ANYone's "free speech",
Toiddie. It has to do with technical compliance with federal law,
which EVERY person must do in the United States.


No dumb### there is...but hey I'm still waiting.....maybe if you kiss
the FCC ### a little harder maybe they show up...


After being only the SECOND RRAP'er to get booted off the Internet
TWICE, you still haven't learned a thing, have you?

Maybe the third time will be the charm?

If you're generating 100 watts of RF at 13mHz to radiate a Part 15
level signal, I say you're an idiot...A WASTEFUL idiot at that.

What TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION do you offer for operating in this
manner?


To compile with Part 15.....Steve stick with Ham radio better yet I
have some walkie talkies I send you...they seems to be more your speed


What did you "compile" for Part 15?

I know you're compiling violations, but that's nothing new.

And you didn't answer my question, TrashMouth...

WHY would you generate over 100 watts inorder to radiate less than
Part 15 limitis...according to you, that is.......

BTW you will have proven my point that YOU and the FCC are supressing
not only the free speech of amateur radio operators, but the free
speech of Part 15 radio stations.

What Part 15 radio stations, ToiddieBoy?

You've admitted right here that you're running 100 watts.

You're illegal, ToiddieBoy...Just like I said you were...


Steve I'm going only say this once Your a ####ing idiot..and I'm done,
either put up or shut up


And I'm going to say this until I decide to not say it any
more...Your misuse of the English language proves that your only
"campus time" has been as janitorial staff.

Idiot.

Steve, K4YZ



  #6   Report Post  
Old August 21st 06, 10:00 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 454
Default HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!


wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 13:26:16 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


SNIP

Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)

My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.

WHY DID YOU NO ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!

What part of this don't you understand??


I understand it all.


you understand nothing steve now cease and deisst


Seek the services of a reputable second grade English composition
tutor, Morkie.

QUOTE

N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


SNIP

Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30
Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP)
My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy.

WHY DID YOU NOT ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?!


What part of this don't you understand??


I understand it all.

I understand you're an idiot.

I understand that you're a basement dwelling parasite that your
poor, aging parents won't be able to rid themselves of save for death.

I understand that in a fit of rage you made a Freudian slip that
disclosed your TRUE power for your pirate radio station whish is a
quantum leap over the Part 15 limits you CLAIM you're observing.

are you some come of ####ing moron??


No, my last name is NOT "Daugherty"

THE FCC MEASURES ELECTRICAL FIELD, POWER IN WATTS CAN PRODUCT
DIFFERENT ELECTRICAL FIELDS DEPENDING ON ANTENNA, FEED LINE AND OTHER
FACTORS...I put in big letters so you can ####ing understand it.


AND LET ME PUT THIS IN BIG LETTERS SO YOU CAN
UNDERSTAND IT...NO ONE HERE (EXCEPT FOR MORKIE, AND HE THINKS PEOPLE
BELEIVE HIS LIES) BELIEVES YOU'RE GENERATING 100 WATTS OF RF IN
ORDER TO RADIATE PART 15 LEVELS OF HF SIGNAL.

AND IF YOU ARE, IT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES WHO THE "MORON"
REALLY IS!


SNIP

Why hasn't the FCC come to my door??


Perhaps the thought of what they might touch or be touched by is
more appaling than allowing your to think you're a DJ.


no Steve it's bacuse your a ####ing liar.....plain and simple. You
believe what you want to believe and unless it comes form month it not
true.


I believe you're an idiotic moron.

See...THAT was easy!

And even more moronic is your frequent posts that expose your even
MORE moronic and pathetic life wherein you set up make believe
broadcast stations and play disc jockey to a non-existant audience.


I doubt anyone heard anything you put on the air, Toiddie.


Not true on the Free radio Network, a number of people have heard me.


Running 100 watts, I am sure SOMEone did!


Ahhhh Steve, that's what it really is...You mad because you can hear
the station.....


Nope. I don't listen. What coul YOU possibly have to say on the
air that I can't see here?

And if I am hearing you here, it would be proof that you are
violating Part 15, as I already know you are from your posts here.

BTW...Got a legit "N" Number on that illegally modified ultralight
of yours yet? Finsih that "Sport Pilot" license, or just hoping the
feds don't card you one Sunday afternoon?


There nothing illegal about it steve, I own a high max ultralight. Hi
Max can be made into ultralight. Despite what YOU might think, And No,
I've moved that aside for my education I'm hoping to get back ito it
next year steve, thanks for your concern.


There's no convern, Toiddie, except you you illegally modifying an
ultralight as per Part 103.


And yes, Toiddie...A 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight IS
illegal.


Whatever steve, you seem to me that your think ever thing I do is
illegal...


No.


The FAA says a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight violated Part
103.


Period.


Good...You quit while you were behind...Now go refit that
ultralight to make it legal, TrashMouth.

Not if it's only filled to 5 gallons it not.


Yes, it is...The aircraft cannot be CONFIGURED to carry more than
5 gallons of fuel, Toiddieboy.


It says nothing about configured, it says that an ultralight can not
carry no more then 5 gallons of gas. therefor steve, as long as I'm
carrying 5 gallons of gas it is legal.


Reading on...


That ruse has been tried by many others. The FAA says that haivng
a fuel tank in excess of 5 gallons is prima facie evidence of
non-compliance.


That's the same standard that the FCC uses to declare that simly
HAVING a linear amplifier for 11 meters, even if it's not presently
connected, is evidence of non-compliance.


As long as your not using it, there is no violation.


Yes, there is. Ask the THOUSANDS of people who have had a knock a
the door over the years and had thier equipemtn confiscated.


Sure they do in your tiny little mine...


I don't own a mine, Toiddie, although I took a tour of one in
Inyokern, CA, once.

And the FAA and the FCC STILL state that the presence of
illegal modifications, even when not "caught in the act" of being used,

is evidence of failure to comly with thier respective rules and
regulations.

No amount of your pontification about your "freedoms" will change
the FACT that you are implicitly violating several federal laws...

Don't beleive me?


Ask the Department of Justice.


I guess you're at a loss for words here, ToiddieBoy.



I'm Still Waiting for the FCC...but again hey your a liar....


Nope.

Not today...not yesterday...not tomorrow...

BTW, College(Not)Boy...it's "you're" a liar...

(BIG SNIP)

People like you who live "outside the box" in the manner you
describe in yur antics are called "lawbreakers". YOU become MY problem
as a law ABIDING person.


No steve people like you who live in the box has no ####ing life, and
it's ashame people like you can't really enjoy life..but hey you go
back it your little box where you belong, leave us REAL people alone..


I have plenty of life, Toiddie...

And I use a lot of it in order to improve myself with...Such as
using the education I was provided with to properly apply English
grammar to my thoughts.

You should try it too.

And I DO enjoy life, Toiddie...And I enjoy it WITHIN the
boundries of the laws as we as Americans are prescribed to do.

There is NO exception to the use of your HiMax as an ultralight
under Part 103 as you have modified it.


Again Not true, it's only illegal if you fill it up to 10 gallons,
Filling it up to 5 gallons makes it legal.


No, it doesn't.


Haivng a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight is illegal.


Period.


Whatever Steve


Very immature. Of course spoiled basement dwelling brats like you
usuallly are.


nice...closet dweller..


Nope...

And you're STILL in violation of Part 103.

(HUGE SNIP)


Now that I know you've got 100 watts output, I'd have to be crazy
to think no one could hear you, Toiddie, unless you were running that
into a buried dummyload.


Again steve when it comes to Part 15 the FCC is looking for Electrical
field stength not wattage.


You'd have to be a complete idiot to only NOT be radiating more
than Part 15 levels with 100 watts output at that frequency,
Toiddie....Now if you were operating in the 1750 meter band, I could
understand that kind of power loss.


Sure it achieve Part 15 requirement I do have that loss....you seem to
have a hard time understanding that...


No...I understand it perfectly well.

YOU screwed up in a fit of rage and actually announced to the world

how much power you really are using for your illegal broadcasting
operation.

You have FURTHER screwed up by announcing all these "QSL card
requests" you are getting...Just more evidence that you're violating
Part 15.

YOU are the MORON if you think the FCC doesn't have engineers that

understand the technical limitations of Part 15 as opposed to what
you're claiming you're accomplishing.

Are YOU going to tell me that YOU, a General Class Amateur
licensee are INTENTIONALLY operting with those kinds of losses...?!?!?


This is Part 15 not amateur, learn that...


I know it, LiarBoy.

And I know that just because you are CLAIMINIG to be a "legal"
Part 15 operator, your "bragging" indicates that you're technically
incompetent

(MORE SNIPPAGE)


And even more.....

Too bad you didn't just clean up your language in the first place,
which I see in the last couple of posts that you've done now...Too bad
you didn't LEARN before you got shut down the FIRST time.


And Toiddie...No law prevents ANYone from suing if there is
adequate reason to do so. Any lawyer worth his/her salt could have not
only gotten you back on with your original ISP, but probably gotten you
free service for a long, long time.


Ummm...Dumb### Under a federal Law Internet service providers are
immune for what their users put on third party systems and it has been
upheld by the US Supreme Court.....you sure have a hard time
learning....must be from all that ####ing inbreding going on down
there.


No, Toiddie...the lack of learning is YOURS.

You've gotten canned TWICE now for certain behaviour, yet here you
are, doing it AGAIN!

And College(Not)Boy....It's "inbreeding", not "inbreding"...

And FYI, I am from father North than you...

Soooooooooo.....Seems the moron is YOU, ToiddieBoy.,


Yes Steve, I am beacuse I keep talking to a half ### moron


Ooooops....There you go again with the profanity...Working on
getting booted THREE times, Toiddie? Each subsequent boot makes it
easier to justify to the next ISP that you're deserving of punitive
action.


Keep up steve and I'll get you for Cyberstalking, which is a federal
crime...


There's no stalking on MY part, TrashMouth...

YOU keep bringing YOUR mischeviousness HERE...I don't go looking
for you.

Idiot!

I say there's nothing more "homebrew" about any aspect of N9OGL or
any bootleg broadcast station you're running than the PL259's, or
perhaps the occassional dipole.


I don't use dipole only little closet dwellers like you do...


No closet dwelling here, Toiddie...

And if you care to, you can refer to ARRL DXCC award #37,136.

Dipoles and 100 watts served me just fine.

SNIP

This has nothing to do with suppressing ANYone's "free speech",
Toiddie. It has to do with technical compliance with federal law,
which EVERY person must do in the United States.


No dumb### there is...but hey I'm still waiting.....maybe if you kiss
the FCC ### a little harder maybe they show up...


After being only the SECOND RRAP'er to get booted off the Internet

TWICE, you still haven't learned a thing, have you?

Maybe the third time will be the charm?

If you're generating 100 watts of RF at 13mHz to radiate a Part 15
level signal, I say you're an idiot...A WASTEFUL idiot at that.


What TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION do you offer for operating in this
manner?


To compile with Part 15.....Steve stick with Ham radio better yet I
have some walkie talkies I send you...they seems to be more your speed


What did you "compile" for Part 15?

I know you're compiling violations, but that's nothing new.

And you didn't answer my question, TrashMouth...

WHY would you generate over 100 watts inorder to radiate less than
Part 15 limitis...according to you, that is.......

BTW you will have proven my point that YOU and the FCC are supressing
not only the free speech of amateur radio operators, but the free
speech of Part 15 radio stations.


What Part 15 radio stations, ToiddieBoy?


You've admitted right here that you're running 100 watts.


You're illegal, ToiddieBoy...Just like I said you were...


Steve I'm going only say this once Your a ####ing idiot..and I'm done,
either put up or shut up


And I'm going to say this until I decide to not say it any
more...Your misuse of the English language proves that your only
"campus time" has been as janitorial staff.

Idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! N9OGL General 79 August 23rd 06 07:51 AM
Hams ruin welcome at Rose Parade No Roses Policy 16 January 8th 06 09:16 PM
Open Letter to K1MAN [email protected] Policy 13 April 15th 05 07:43 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) N2EY Policy 0 November 30th 03 01:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017