Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Thurs, Oct 19 2006 2:46 am [Jimmie and Davie are interchangeable entities now?] wrote: From: Dave Heil on Wed, Oct 18 2006 3:06 pm wrote: From: on Mon, Oct 16 2006 4:48am wrote: From: on Sun, Oct 15 2006 4:17 pm BECAUSE he has NO proof AT ALL he gets called an IMPOSTER. Yet Hans Brakob has made it available. Frank Gilliland has made it available. So? Who are *you* to demand proof? A MILITARY VETERAN, Jimmie, something you will NEVER be. MILITARY VETERANS get to demand proof? Really? Actually, employers get to, and people that are witness to exaggerated claims of "hostile actions" get to. Anyone witnessing exaggerated claims OUGHT to demand proof. I never saw myself as superior to other citizens who never donned a military uniform. It's a lot like Len being a professional radio, and being told that he'll never be an amateur. Hans is a veteran, Frank is a veteran, Brian Burke is a veteran. I'm a veteran. Dan from W4-land is a veteran. Do we get to demand proof for your sphincter post? It'd be nice to know where and when the artillery barrage took place and if your friend Gene can confirm it. Fair enough. When does Robesin provide documentation of his claims of participating in seven (7) hostile actions? When one takes an Oath putting their LIFE on the line in military service it becomes very serious indeed. Well, it could become very serious if you ever actually had occasion to put your life on the line. Would any of seven (7) hostile actions be such an occasion? One helluva lot MORE SERIOUS than having some amateur radio hobby with imagined self-glory. ...only if you were called upon to actually put your life on the line, Len. Otherwise, you need to quit wrapping yourself in bunting and stepping up on that soapbox. No bunting. By serving (in the military), you are in the que for whatever comes up. Lots of folks weren't up to it. Jim/N2EY is one such person. Would the term "self-glory" come into play in discussing a guy who went into great detail describing what it was like to undergo an artillery barrage, except that he had never been involved in such an event? Prolly no more than a guy that got caught claiming participation in seven (7) hostile actions. Would you be inclined to describe such an individual as a sort of imposter? It is certainly something for you to ponder. Dave K8MN It is certainly something for Robesin to ponder, wouldn't you agree? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Thurs, Oct 19 2006 2:46 am [Jimmie and Davie are interchangeable entities now?] wrote: From: Dave Heil on Wed, Oct 18 2006 3:06 pm wrote: From: on Mon, Oct 16 2006 4:48am wrote: From: on Sun, Oct 15 2006 4:17 pm BECAUSE he has NO proof AT ALL he gets called an IMPOSTER. Yet Hans Brakob has made it available. Frank Gilliland has made it available. So? Who are *you* to demand proof? A MILITARY VETERAN, Jimmie, something you will NEVER be. MILITARY VETERANS get to demand proof? Really? Actually, employers get to, and people that are witness to exaggerated claims of "hostile actions" get to. Anyone witnessing exaggerated claims OUGHT to demand proof. I never saw myself as superior to other citizens who never donned a military uniform. It's a lot like Len being a professional radio, and being told that he'll never be an amateur. I never knew that Len was a professional radio. I'll make a note of it. Op is the operative word. Why would anyone as smug as you make a note of anything? Hans is a veteran, Frank is a veteran, Brian Burke is a veteran. I'm a veteran. Dan from W4-land is a veteran. Do we get to demand proof for your sphincter post? It'd be nice to know where and when the artillery barrage took place and if your friend Gene can confirm it. Fair enough. When does Robesin provide documentation of his claims of participating in seven (7) hostile actions? I'd say that a good time would be right after Len bares his soul and admits that he engaged in being an imposter in regard to what it is like to go through an artillery barrage. I'm guessing that won't happen. Why after? When one takes an Oath putting their LIFE on the line in military service it becomes very serious indeed. Well, it could become very serious if you ever actually had occasion to put your life on the line. Would any of seven (7) hostile actions be such an occasion? I'd say it would. If it actually happened. One helluva lot MORE SERIOUS than having some amateur radio hobby with imagined self-glory. ...only if you were called upon to actually put your life on the line, Len. Otherwise, you need to quit wrapping yourself in bunting and stepping up on that soapbox. No bunting. I see bunting. Len is wrapped in it. By serving (in the military), you are in the que for whatever comes up. I didn't like queues when I was in the military. I sure don't have to queue for anything now. We're aware of your dislike for military service, and you're certainly not in the que any longer. My inactive service committment ends this year. Lots of folks weren't up to it. Jim/N2EY is one such person. That's a pretty bold supposition on your part. What indicates that someone "wasn't up to it"? You'll have to ask Jim what the problem was. He hasn't been forthcoming with that information. Would the term "self-glory" come into play in discussing a guy who went into great detail describing what it was like to undergo an artillery barrage, except that he had never been involved in such an event? Prolly no more than a guy that got caught claiming participation in seven (7) hostile actions. I've seen no detailed description on Steve's part. Len's description was quite detailed, right down to sphincter. Everyone's got one. They all stink. Would you be inclined to describe such an individual as a sort of imposter? It is certainly something for you to ponder. It is certainly something for Robesin to ponder, wouldn't you agree? Would I? Dave K8MN No, maybe you wouldn't. Len says something and he's a liar. Robesin says the same thing seven different ways and he's good to go. It's not hard to figure you out. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Thurs, Oct 19 2006 2:46 am [Jimmie and Davie are interchangeable entities now?] wrote: From: Dave Heil on Wed, Oct 18 2006 3:06 pm wrote: From: on Mon, Oct 16 2006 4:48am wrote: From: on Sun, Oct 15 2006 4:17 pm BECAUSE he has NO proof AT ALL he gets called an IMPOSTER. Yet Hans Brakob has made it available. Frank Gilliland has made it available. So? Who are *you* to demand proof? A MILITARY VETERAN, Jimmie, something you will NEVER be. MILITARY VETERANS get to demand proof? Really? Actually, employers get to, and people that are witness to exaggerated claims of "hostile actions" get to. Anyone witnessing exaggerated claims OUGHT to demand proof. I never saw myself as superior to other citizens who never donned a military uniform. It's a lot like Len being a professional radio, and being told that he'll never be an amateur. I never knew that Len was a professional radio. I'll make a note of it. Op is the operative word. That word wasn't included. Why would anyone as smug as you make a note of anything? I'd make a note, as I wrote, because I never knew that Len was a professional radio. Should the term be "PROFESSIONAL radio"? Hans is a veteran, Frank is a veteran, Brian Burke is a veteran. I'm a veteran. Dan from W4-land is a veteran. Do we get to demand proof for your sphincter post? It'd be nice to know where and when the artillery barrage took place and if your friend Gene can confirm it. Fair enough. When does Robesin provide documentation of his claims of participating in seven (7) hostile actions? I'd say that a good time would be right after Len bares his soul and admits that he engaged in being an imposter in regard to what it is like to go through an artillery barrage. I'm guessing that won't happen. Why after? Why do you think it might be? It might be that the individual making countless statements of "IMPOSTER" regarding the military service of another, is himself guilty of being an imposter. What do you think about Len's description of what it is like to go through an artillery barrage? When one takes an Oath putting their LIFE on the line in military service it becomes very serious indeed. Well, it could become very serious if you ever actually had occasion to put your life on the line. Would any of seven (7) hostile actions be such an occasion? I'd say it would. If it actually happened. Ok. Now what? One helluva lot MORE SERIOUS than having some amateur radio hobby with imagined self-glory. ...only if you were called upon to actually put your life on the line, Len. Otherwise, you need to quit wrapping yourself in bunting and stepping up on that soapbox. No bunting. I see bunting. Len is wrapped in it. By serving (in the military), you are in the que for whatever comes up. I didn't like queues when I was in the military. I sure don't have to queue for anything now. We're aware of your dislike for military service, and you're certainly not in the que any longer. If you're aware of my dislike, kindly fill me in on it. How did my dislike manifest itself? After all, unlike many, I got the job I wanted. I was able to skip technical school. My inactive service committment ends this year. I don't know what to make of your statement. What am I supposed to feel, think or write? I noticed that you made a spelling error. I've decided not to comment on it. Turn about is fair play. Lots of folks weren't up to it. Jim/N2EY is one such person. That's a pretty bold supposition on your part. What indicates that someone "wasn't up to it"? You'll have to ask Jim what the problem was. Is that what you did? You asked him and he told you that he wasn't up to it? He hasn't been forthcoming with that information. That didn't seem to stop you from ascribing motivation or lack thereof. Would the term "self-glory" come into play in discussing a guy who went into great detail describing what it was like to undergo an artillery barrage, except that he had never been involved in such an event? Prolly no more than a guy that got caught claiming participation in seven (7) hostile actions. I've seen no detailed description on Steve's part. Len's description was quite detailed, right down to sphincter. Everyone's got one. They all stink. I've not thought to check. Would you be inclined to describe such an individual as a sort of imposter? It is certainly something for you to ponder. It is certainly something for Robesin to ponder, wouldn't you agree? Would I? No, maybe you wouldn't. Then there's the chance that I would. Len says something and he's a liar. I think you may be on to something. Do you think that artillery barrage took place in peacetime Japan? Could it have taken place near Greenlee Industries? Might it have been in Len's neighborhood when Len and others in his area were stirred up over zoning changes? Robesin says the same thing seven different ways and he's good to go. What did Steve say about his actions? Did he ever describe an action which you know did not take place? Do you see a difference? I see an old codger with egg on his face, calling another military veteran an IMPOSTER without a shred of evidence. I did find a web site which lists Steve by full name and USMC rank. Did you find it? It's not hard to figure you out. It is if you take the time to do it right. Dave K8MN |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
Len says something and he's a liar. I think you may be on to something. Do you think that artillery barrage took place in peacetime Japan? Could it have taken place near Greenlee Industries? Might it have been in Len's neighborhood when Len and others in his area were stirred up over zoning changes? Robesin says the same thing seven different ways and he's good to go. What did Steve say about his actions? Did he ever describe an action which you know did not take place? Do you see a difference? I see an old codger with egg on his face, calling another military veteran an IMPOSTER without a shred of evidence. I did find a web site which lists Steve by full name and USMC rank. Did you find it? It's not hard to figure you out. It is if you take the time to do it right. Dave K8MN Please forgive Len, Dave. He is on a "mission" and obviously considers himself to be humorist with an ability to color the written word. His facts are oft askew, but he is entertaining from time to time. If Len blends facts with fiction, so what? He is an entertainer seeking self-gratification by needling those whom he considers to be the dregs of his inferiors on Usenet. Nothing more, nothing less. Len is, by and large, a non-entity, one best ignored. As I've noted in the past, Len has many talents, flatus being his ultimate trademark. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?
Arf! Arf! wrote: Len says something and he's a liar. I think you may be on to something. Do you think that artillery barrage took place in peacetime Japan? Could it have taken place near Greenlee Industries? Might it have been in Len's neighborhood when Len and others in his area were stirred up over zoning changes? Robesin says the same thing seven different ways and he's good to go. What did Steve say about his actions? Did he ever describe an action which you know did not take place? yes you have or rather you called a peiece of equipment that was part of your job a col Do you see a difference? I see an old codger with egg on his face, calling another military veteran an IMPOSTER without a shred of evidence. it is his lack of evidence that is at issue steve I did find a web site which lists Steve by full name and USMC rank. Did you find it? yes I did but it was your own creation Robeson As I've noted in the past, Len has many talents, flatus being his ultimate trademark. alwaays with the body funtions steve you are truly disguting |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Direct Question for Brian P Burke, N0IMD. | Policy | |||
Embarrassing Moments Caught on Tape | Scanner |