Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
wrote: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. not that isn't fair BB there is No valid reasoning for the Code test any more the cllosest is boils down to "Tradition" and is fine as far as it goes but they all fall down toin todays world |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. not that isn't fair BB there is No valid reasoning for the Code test any more That's why I like to see them try to justify it. the cllosest is boils down to "Tradition" and is fine as far as it goes but they all fall down toin todays world Good Grief! It's as if the US Navy really does control the ARS, just like they wanted to do in the early days. With the Navy, its all about tradition. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: the cllosest is boils down to "Tradition" and is fine as far as it goes but they all fall down toin todays world Good Grief! It's as if the US Navy really does control the ARS, just like they wanted to do in the early days. With the Navy, its all about tradition. I was thinking of jews esp east european jews ala fiddler on the roof |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: the cllosest is boils down to "Tradition" and is fine as far as it goes but they all fall down toin todays world Good Grief! It's as if the US Navy really does control the ARS, just like they wanted to do in the early days. With the Navy, its all about tradition. I was thinking of jews esp east european jews ala fiddler on the roof I don't know much about them. Do they oppress their own people? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
wrote in message oups.com... wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. If he and I wanted to have sex I'd invite him over, for that matter if Brian Burke is in the nighboorhood he is invited to drop by for a blow job two http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
wrote in
oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. Here's a valid reason for continued CW testing: To keep lowlifes like you and Markie out of ham radio and off HF. You're too lazy to try to be real hams. You see no value in being effective communicators, therefore you're both worthless to the service and if you had to use CW to save a life that person would die. You're both probably too lazy to use a microphone to help save anyone too. I'd like to see the No-code Tech class go away with a 5 wpm Tech the being entry level to the service, or bring back a code only Novice class again. Require 13 wpm code test for general and 20 wpm an Extra again. People that don't like it should stay on CB. Ten-Four? This should provide you and Markie a lot to stroke each other with. You both seem to sing the same tune. SC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
In article .net,
says... wrote in oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. You see no value in being effective communicators, The most effective communication is plain english! 73 Chris |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Papa Dog wrote in
: In article .net, says... wrote in oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. You see no value in being effective communicators, The most effective communication is plain english! 73 Chris Yes you're right, unless you're trying to pass a message through someone that doesn't know how to speak english. CW is a wonderful thing. Real communicators know CW and know how to use it. SC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Slow Code is the kind of guy that everybodys hates on the air. He is
the Jammer because no one listens to him. On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:13:24 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Papa Dog wrote in : In article .net, says... wrote in oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. You see no value in being effective communicators, The most effective communication is plain english! 73 Chris Yes you're right, unless you're trying to pass a message through someone that doesn't know how to speak english. CW is a wonderful thing. Real communicators know CW and know how to use it. SC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
hey BB did steve do somethign specail toy uo laely? | Policy | |||
More News of Radio Amateurs' Work in the Andamans | Shortwave | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Broadcasting | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy |