| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
December 3rd 06, 01:28 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Why can't you people see that CW makes better more capable hams?
Slow Code wrote:
Lets just say the microphone on your HF rig breaks during an emergency and you don't have a spare. The ham that knows CW can keep communicating. The ham that doesn't know CW is going to die. Moral: Always have a spare microphone available. |
|
#2
December 3rd 06, 01:33 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why can't you people see that CW makes better more capable hams?
|
|
#3
December 8th 06, 12:35 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why can't you people see that CW makes better more capable hams?
|
|
#4
December 8th 06, 03:28 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why can't you people see that CW makes better more capable hams?
Slow Code wrote:
wrote in s.com: Slow Code wrote: Lets just say the microphone on your HF rig breaks during an emergency and you don't have a spare. The ham that knows CW can keep communicating. The ham that doesn't know CW is going to die. Moral: Always have a spare microphone available. ROFL Funny and common sense at the same time! How about that. I would have expected any one else here but you to post that. Why? If someone is worried about microphone failure at a critical time, it makes sense to have a spare microphone available. LOL Yup. Sometimes common sense is so obvious that it's almost funny. Now, what would you do if the rig broke down in an emergency? That's probably more likely than a microphone failure. Can you fix any failure in the rigs you use? |
|
#6
December 9th 06, 02:19 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why can't you people see that CW makes better more capable hams?
"Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... wrote in oups.com: Slow Code wrote: wrote in s.com: Slow Code wrote: Lets just say the microphone on your HF rig breaks during an emergency and you don't have a spare. The ham that knows CW can keep communicating. The ham that doesn't know CW is going to die. Moral: Always have a spare microphone available. ROFL Funny and common sense at the same time! How about that. I would have expected any one else here but you to post that. Why? If someone is worried about microphone failure at a critical time, it makes sense to have a spare microphone available. Yes to all that, but the point I wanted to make was that CW is another way to get a message through. It's another tool in the tool box that can be used when other tools are not available. A ham that doesn't know CW doesn't have that tool. Hope he has a spare mic. SC Most have spare rigs. You OTOH, well, you're just destitute. |
|
#7
December 12th 06, 04:38 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why can't you people see that CW makes better more capable hams?
wrote:
Slow Code wrote: wrote in s.com: Slow Code wrote: Lets just say the microphone on your HF rig breaks during an emergency and you don't have a spare. The ham that knows CW can keep communicating. The ham that doesn't know CW is going to die. Moral: Always have a spare microphone available. ROFL Funny and common sense at the same time! How about that. I would have expected any one else here but you to post that. Why? If someone is worried about microphone failure at a critical time, it makes sense to have a spare microphone available. LOL Yup. Sometimes common sense is so obvious that it's almost funny. Now, what would you do if the rig broke down in an emergency? That's probably more likely than a microphone failure. Can you fix any failure in the rigs you use? |
|
#8
December 14th 06, 01:48 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why can't you people see that CW makes better more capable hams?
Slow Code wrote:
wrote in oups.com: Slow Code wrote: wrote in s.com: Slow Code wrote: Lets just say the microphone on your HF rig breaks during an emergency and you don't have a spare. The ham that knows CW can keep communicating. The ham that doesn't know CW is going to die. Moral: Always have a spare microphone available. ROFL Funny and common sense at the same time! How about that. I would have expected any one else here but you to post that. Why? If someone is worried about microphone failure at a critical time, it makes sense to have a spare microphone available. Yes to all that, but the point I wanted to make was that CW is another way to get a message through. Of course it is - sometimes. Anyone with any sense already knows that. It's another tool in the tool box that can be used when other tools are not available. Of course - but is it such a useful and necessary tool that it *must* be in *every* radio amateur's toolbox just in case no other tool is available? A ham that doesn't know CW doesn't have that tool. True. But a ham who doesn't have a PSK-31 setup doesn't have that tool. A ham who cannot operate (due to rig, antenna, and/or license limitiations) on every amateur band and mode doesn't have those tools either. Hope he has a spare mic. How often do microphones fail at a critical moment, anyway? Seems like a spare mike in the toolbox is a good idea. And while we're talking of toolboxes, Do you have every possible tool, plus all the skill and knowledge, needed to fix your rigs and antennas if they were to break at a critical moment? --- I'm all for Morse Code tests and hams having lots of knowledge and skills. But the idea that all hams must pass Morse Code tests solely because there might someday arise an emergency where they had to use Morse Code is just not convincing to me at all. |
|
#9
December 14th 06, 01:51 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
kookathon
wrote: I'm all for Morse Code tests and hams having lots of knowledge and skills. But the idea that all hams must pass Morse Code tests solely because there might someday arise an emergency where they had to use Morse Code is just not convincing to me at all. then why should we take code testing |
|
#10
December 14th 06, 11:36 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Morkie Run Amok
nobodys_old_friend wrote: wrote: I'm all for Morse Code tests and hams having lots of knowledge and skills. But the idea that all hams must pass Morse Code tests solely because there might someday arise an emergency where they had to use Morse Code is just not convincing to me at all. then why should we take code testing Too bad you haven't been paying attention all these years, Morkie. Steve, K4YZ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Beware of hams planting dis-information... | CB | |||
| FYI: NOAA Lightning Safety Awareness Week | Policy | |||
| Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
| How would you improve your CB? | CB | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Linear Mode
