Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 28, 2:02�pm, John Smith I wrote: wrote:* ... Len: I believe that they MUST APPLY to have that copyright lengthened, it does not automatically occur (and, on or before a certain day the work will expire copyright)--you'd be surprised how many works still fail that. *Although, some publishing houses are set up to "automatically apply", even though they had no interest in the work they end up gaining possession of the copyright! The www.copyright.gov website will clear that up on OLD copyrights. Once 1978 was reached there was "life plus 50." Now, just WHO is going to renew such things other than corporate entities? :-) Now it is "life plus 70." Arguing matters over a 1938 copyright in the year 2007 is rather like "how many angels dance on the head of a pin?" :-) Individuals/corps make a living though such "questionable practices." J. K. Lasser's "Your Income Tax" came out on news- stands faithfully during year-end holiday time in the USA. For many years. Had ALL the IRS forms in it. NOT a "questionable practice." Quicken does the same thing but goes through all the decision diamonds and the math to fil them in. No charge for duping the fed forms. Enormous work in programming the thing. BTW, J.K. was the father of actress Louise Lasser. Government works are NOT copyrightable. By law. I've downloaded (for free) lots of old textbooks, mostly TMs but reproed hard-covers from different Internet sites. Those are out-of-date now (for their material) but are useful for nostalgia purposes or just to cross- check where some of the slightly-later theory things came from. Many folks have been very busy copying all those (all pages included, even blank ones), putting them together to upload for others. I'm not going to get in ten kinds of snit to forever argue the "legality" of such repros. Such arguments are done by LITTLE people trying to be "big" barracks lawyers. If someone goes to a lot of trouble to do the copying and collating and uploading, take advantage of it. It is NOT some grande felony matter such as pirating a copy of "Pirates of the Carribean" DVD or the latest "hit diva" wailing into a microphone for a 2007 platinum CD issue. The ultimate in such copying was the enormous job a group had in cleaning up an R-390 receiver TM. Quite legal. But, they not only cleaned up the schematics and graphics, they RETYPED the text and many tables! Terribly neat, easy to read TM was the result. Of interest only to boatanchor collectors, not the collectors of pre-1950 Study Guides. Sheesh. However, some regard old ARRL publications as religious icons. Nothing logical could be said about them. LA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
LAPD getting rid of "Code 2-High" calls on 5/16 | Scanner | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |