Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
VE Testing Rules
wrote in message ... On 10 Mar 2007 17:59:15 -0800, wrote: On Mar 10, 2:02 pm, " wrote: I was pleased with my local VE team's performance (all four, not just three) and congratulated them after the testing was over. [I observed them while they were observing me and the applicant group] They were ARRL VEs, weren't they? according the FCC it was the ARRL VEC http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/Appl...applID=3873254 However, that is not extendable to "all" VEs nor all those involved in this newsgroup. Why not? Most of the statements in this thread about VEs are just using it as a springboard to talk trash to other old "enemies." :-( Considering the number of statements you make to rrap, Len, it seems you are projecting your motivations on others. you have not been reading the thread Four year olds capable of responsible cognition of the written-English test material? Irrelevant, Len. "Responsible cognition" is not a requirement of the license test. true but still But still. My money says the four year olds can author a much better sentence than Mark. -- do u hav anyting cognet two say? |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
libel and VE Testing
"Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "Fat Cassie" anon@anon wrote in message news I do not legitimize such. My objective was to deal with the data. Dee, N8UZE So what do you know of Mark's wife? BTW if you would since she does not read my posts do tell her that she Dee is onw my wife list of folks she will not speak on on air or qsl although I still would but only in slam bang thank you for the contact sort of way Oh, the laughter. I'll bet THAT will really upset Dee. Doesn't matter to me. Although it seems rather strange since I have said nothing about his wife and very little about him. Dee, N8UZE In Mark's jumbled mind, Dee, you need not do so. In his paranoid mind you are guilty by association. Ignore him. |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
libel and VE Testing
wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:48:47 -0500, "Fat Cassie" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:27:59 -0800, John Smith I wrote: wrote: a women such as Dee should have better about attacks on other women, period Stop whining, Mark. You sound like a petulant six year old. we;; Cassie you should be outraged too being that you are a gal yourself how would you feel if someone called you a man I'd consider the source and let it drop. I'd certainly NOT accuse the poster of "staking" or of many of the other myriad accusations you make. Norwould I whine about it in fifty to sixty posts per diem. You really are paranoid/delusional, you know. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
libel and VE Testing
Were you afraid? yes when someone taken seriously responds without even noting that she is jioning calling my wife a man threatens us with incitment of further violnece You said, "not stlaking just garden variety jerking you around it does not rise to stalking till somebody makes a threat of violence so not quite" never said that You certainly did. nope I did not That is a direct quote from a post you made just yesterday. it was made by one of the sock puppets that like forge me You are lying again. Heck, who knows? If you tell it often enough maybe someone will believe you. but you fail to adress the issue of dee giving credence to steve shemale **** by repaeting in her own posts I need not bother addressing a non-issue. I'll leave that entirely up to your odd thought processes. and he choosing to call me Morkie in here responses to the thread Oh, here you go again. Whining. Did it hurt your sensitivities by being called Morkie? Too bad. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
libel and VE Testing
wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:01:37 -0500, "Fat Cassie" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:14:20 -0500, "Fat Cassie" anon@anon wrote: Oh, here you go again. Whining. Did it hurt your sensitivities by being called Morkie? she claims she does not enage in name calling and then does it Read Dee's posts again. why should they were bad enough the first time Try to comprehend. Dee is fair and objective and has already discredited your goofy accusations. no she has not discredited anything She has not "enage"d in ANY name calling. bull**** when she titles some Morkie..." she is name calling Referring to you as Morkie is NOT name calling, despite your best attempts to twist it otherwise. Now, if she'd called you an asshole, THAT would be name-calling. you are the proof of what I accuse her of giving activ e aid to my foes wether deliberately or negliantly i care not You have "foes", whether real or imagined, because of your incessant and boorish flooding of this and other newsgroups. Dee offers no aid to anybody other than assisting fellow Amateurs to upgrade and further enjoy this hobby. Your accusations ring as hollow as that head of yours, Morkie. and yet you go on and on about them When I post sixty, seventy or more posts per diem, or 400 posts in any given month, then tell me I go "on and on". And if I were as doltish as you, and if I were to be so stupid as to flood this group with spam demanding an "apology" from Steve, then you might be able to accuse me of going "on and on". Again, Morkie, you prove over and over that you are obsessive/compulsive and lack touch with reality. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
libel and VE Testing
wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:23:24 -0500, "Fat Cassie" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:01:37 -0500, "Fat Cassie" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:14:20 -0500, "Fat Cassie" anon@anon wrote: Oh, here you go again. Whining. Did it hurt your sensitivities by being called Morkie? she claims she does not enage in name calling and then does it Read Dee's posts again. why should they were bad enough the first time Try to comprehend. Dee is fair and objective and has already discredited your goofy accusations. no she has not discredited anything She has not "enage"d in ANY name calling. bull**** when she titles some Morkie..." she is name calling Referring to you as Morkie is NOT name calling, yes it is palina nd simple you are the proof of what I accuse her of giving activ e aid to my foes wether deliberately or negliantly i care not You have "foes", whether real or imagined, because of your incessant and boorish flooding of this and other newsgroups. nope it is becuase I did not yeaild to the blackmail of Steve J robeson 9 years agao Dee offers no aid to anybody bull**** you deliberately or neglenatly aided Roesbon your posts are proof of that Again, Morkie, you prove over and over that you are obsessive/compulsive and lack touch with reality. funny uo are the one that can't even give their own name that has to enage in name calling at every chance Making ovservations of your strange habits is not name calling. I state facts. You certainly provide no shortage of ammunition. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
VE Testing Rules
wrote:
I was pleased with my local VE team's performance (all four, not just three) and congratulated them after the testing was over. [I observed them while they were observing me and the applicant group] They were ARRL VEs, weren't they? Perhaps this was the same VE team that tested the 4 1/2 year old? That way, they could likewise "mentor" old geezers during their examination, so said bitter old geezers could get their 'license'? |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
libel and VE Testing
wrote:
I spuse I confused stave when I said Local as oposed to houghton/hancock area and mike just followed suit Not at all. You're the one who claims Steve "lied". Steve made a factual statement, as did I. There are 19 licensed amateurs in Chasell. That is not a "lie". Anyone can go to QRZ and see for themselves For the record I have never asked for session in chassell but one in Houghton in the same room that can be used by Husky ARS members and CCARS member almost anytime (if MTU is hosting some conference restrictions aplly) I dropped George an email containing links to the postings containing your accusations that his VE team is biased (very serious charges, as I'm sure you know, since they could affect his status as a licensed amateur.) Perhaps he'd like to comment. At the very least maybe he'll give you a call on the phone or stop by to have a chat with you. |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Morkie and VE Testing
"Dee Flint" wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of irate applicants posing a threat to the Volunteer Examiners. I stand corrected. Wouldn't that be a good reason for VEs to "pack heat"? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radio Revolution, the DRM way | Shortwave | |||
Revolution in Ukraine? | Shortwave | |||
The Revolution Will Not be Televised | Shortwave | |||
The Revolution Isn't Being Radioized | Shortwave | |||
Revolution in Haiti? | Shortwave |