Lenof21 wrote: In article .com, writes: Of course it's also possible that Len has gotten so desperate for attention that he's intentionally posting untrue things (like the legality of operating with an expired license mistake) just to get a response. "Desperately?!?" BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHEHEHEHEHEHEH. Excuse me, yer lordship, lost control there... Bwhaha...oops. You lose control EVERYwhere, Lennie. We expect it. After all, how does it affect *him* if some ham reads his words, thinks they're true, and operates illegally? HAMS rule amateur radio. FCC doesn't require commissioners or staff to hold amateur radio licenses in order to regulate U.S. amateur radio. Which has absolutely NO bearing on YOUR assertion, and failure to retract same, about the legality of operating after the end of the term of license. You have previously claimed to be a "radio professional". Your posts herein present evidence to the contrary. Ergo, J.P. logic has it that NO HAM SHOULD OBEY THE FCC IF THEY DON'T HAVE HAM LICENSES! A logical person would realize that a perosn is NOT a Ham if they don't have a license. Surprising that you didn't catch this, Lennie, since YOU are IN that category. Poop Dave the 1st would claim the FCC isn't "motivated." The Coslonaut (heading for outer space) only wants to talk about socks. Is he really a sock-tucker? Hmmmm....Yet ANOTHER example of Lennie initiating diminutives when not the recipient of same from that person. Why does Lennie continue to present evidence that supports everyone ELSES contention that he's a spiteful and deceitful creep? The Avenging Angle keeps nurturing his murderous hatred. If anyone, least of all me, was nuturing "murderous hatred" against you, Lennie, you would have long ago been relegated to "curious footnote" in the history of this newsgroup. The opportunities and the technology are just too numerous and available to have not availed themselves to your overdue demise. The University Lecturer wants to talk about highways. And he IS a university lecturer. And YOU were...?!?! This newsgroup be gettin' FUN-EEEE! Help, Lennie...seek HELP...And NOT from spouses' who's certificate are endorsed "K-Tel Skool of Sigh-Kyatry" Too bad the PCTA extras aren't talking about amateur radio or the morse code test issue. We do. This is not the ONLY forum in which we can express ourselves. Since we HAVE Amateur licenses, we can actually discuss AMATEUR matters ON-THE-AIR! You, on the otherhand, and with the exceptions of cellphones, cordless exensions, and CB radio, cannot. Putz. Steve, K4YZ |
Lenof21 wrote:
In article .com, writes: Of course it's also possible that Len has gotten so desperate for attention that he's intentionally posting untrue things (like the legality of operating with an expired license mistake) just to get a response. "Desperately?!?" No, Len. "Desperate". BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHEHEHEHEHEHEH. Excuse me, yer lordship, lost control there... Bwhaha...oops. We'll wait while you go freshen up, Len. ;-) You do appear to be desperate for attention. After all, how does it affect *him* if some ham reads his words, thinks they're true, and operates illegally? HAMS rule amateur radio. You seem to think so, but you're mistaken. Just as you are mistaken about the legality of FCC-licensed radio amateurs operating amateur radio stations while their amateur radio licenses are expired but in the grace period. FCC doesn't require commissioners or staff to hold amateur radio licenses in order to regulate U.S. amateur radio. That's true. Those people *are* required to have other qualifications, though, and to be appointed to their positions. You're neither a radio amateur nor part of the FCC. And you never have been, Len. You don't have the qualifications to be either. Ergo, J.P. logic has it that NO HAM SHOULD OBEY THE FCC IF THEY DON'T HAVE HAM LICENSES! Nope. Nowhere do I say that. You're simply mistaken, Len. What I will say is that *you* do not "rule amateur radio", Len. |
Len Anderson wrote: In article .com, writes: Steve Robeson K4YZ wrote: Subject: ARS License Numbers From: Date: 1/6/2005 6:00 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: . com Lenof21 wrote: WHY? The license holder isn't prohibited from doing anything after midnight of the last day of his/her 10-year-active-license period...and for two more years into that grace period. That's simply not true, Len. The holder of an expired FCC amateur radio license cannot legally operate until the license has been renewed. This is the second time I've seen you state that mistake here in the past few days. An expired FCC amateur license carries *no* operating privleges. IS there some reason you persist in this obvious error? I told ya... His Worminess has yet laid his long-tailed ignorance to bare in a house full of rocking chairs. It's just a mistake, Steve. Len Anderson obviously doesn't understand 97.21(b). Tsk, tsk, tsk. The Nun of the Above simply didn't understand that his/her/it leg was pulled. [androgynous behavior makes gender identification difficult] Uh huh...I love how his "revelation" of "humor" comes after two weeks of getting his nose rubbed in his arrogant stupidity. I get the feeling Lennie was the kid on the block with the only decent football who would snatch it up and run home as soon as it was apparent that he wasn't good at it and was getting beat soundly. He certainly comes off that way. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Len Anderson wrote:
In article .com, writes: Steve Robeson K4YZ wrote: Subject: ARS License Numbers From: Date: 1/6/2005 6:00 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: . com Lenof21 wrote: WHY? The license holder isn't prohibited from doing anything after midnight of the last day of his/her 10-year-active-license period...and for two more years into that grace period. That's simply not true, Len. The holder of an expired FCC amateur radio license cannot legally operate until the license has been renewed. This is the second time I've seen you state that mistake here in the past few days. An expired FCC amateur license carries *no* operating privleges. IS there some reason you persist in this obvious error? I told ya... His Worminess has yet laid his long-tailed ignorance to bare in a house full of rocking chairs. It's just a mistake, Steve. Len Anderson obviously doesn't understand 97.21(b). Tsk, tsk, tsk. The Nun of the Above simply didn't understand that his/her/it leg was pulled. Len, Who are you addressing as "Nun of the Above"? Can't be me. If you're pulling any body part, it isn't mine and it isn't a leg. You simply made a mistake about 97.21(b). Plain as day. You've repeated it a few times, but you're still mistaken. [androgynous behavior makes gender identification difficult] Androgynous behavior by whom? There are many, many reasons, all valid, for being unable to renew prior to the last day of the 10-year period. Such as? Death? Coma? Prisoner-of-War (about the ONLY valid reason I can think of...) ? Well, someone could be ill, or busy with work, family, volunteer activities, travel, moving, natural disaster, military service, etc. FCC doesn't care. If a ham lets his/her amateur license expire, they can't legally operate until it is renewed. Such renewal is valid when it shows up in the FCC database - you don't have to wait for the paper license to show up. All of this is *extremely basic* regulatory stuff, clearly stated in 97.21(b), not somebody's opinion or interpretation. Tsk. Yes, Len, one would think you'd know something that basic about Part 97. But not only are you spouting mistakes, you refuse to acknowledge them. What is most interesting is the fact that someone like Len, who has told us how the regulations should be changed for so many years, should be so ignorant of such a basic rule from Part 97. Tsk. The Nun of the Above, Who is that, Len? who designs and builds his Nuns are female, Len. own "state of the art" vacuum tube based radios in the 1990s, is seemingly unaware of solid-state technology having overtaken vacuum-state some three decades prior. Well, you're obviously not talking about me, because I've never said any of my homebrew ham radio projects are "state of the art". Perhaps you're talking about yourself? No, that can't be it, because you don't have any homebrew amateur radio projects to show us at all. In fact, I recall that you had to *buy* a manufactured cb set back in 1958 or so, despite all your alleged knowledge of "radio-electronics". The Nun of the Above Who would that be? has constantly made his "his"? Nuns are female. old-time radio heroes to be pioneers of "firsts" despite absolutely NO radio broadcasting transmitter copying the AM adaptation of Reggie Fessenden done in public demonstration on 1906 (special carbon microphone in series with antenna lead of spark trans- mitter). What are you talking about, Len? Perhaps you should look up how Fessenden did the 1906 broadcast. He used an RF alternator, IIRC, not spark. But you've made so many mistakes about RAF that no one is surprised when you make another. Yet the Nun wishes to rap all knuckles with his/her/it Nuns are female, Len. ruler when such pioneering radio heroism isn't met with enthusiastic acclaim. Well, that leaves me out. I'm against violence, both against children and those who act like children... The Nun of the Above Who? constantly refers to old regulations, including those made by government radio regulating agencies which no longer existed after 1934. Which old regulations, Len? The only regulations I've referred to recently are current ones. Like 97.21(b). Do you know that one? The Nun also applies his/her/it's ruler to knuckles which do not recognize his/her/it's truism that morse code testing is a "necessity" for all new amateur licensees' privileges of operating below 30 MHz on amateur radio bands. Well, whoever this mythical Nun person is, she's right about that! Until FCC changes the rules, a Morse Code test is a necessity for all new amateur licensees who want transmitting privileges on the amateur bands below 30 MHz. FCC won't issue the license without such a test being passed, and a license is a necessity for *legal* operation. Of course, Len, you have no such license. Nor are you particularly familiar with Part 97. All simply MUST do so...as it has always been done...no good reasons given. Operating within the law isn't a good reason? That striking ruler is again applied whenever an NCTA dares to question his/her/it's Nuns are female, Len. claims of the efficacy of morse code mode over and above all other modes (which it isn't, but that is besides the point to any PCTA). Who has claimed that? Not me. The Nun of the Above is an ultra-strict literalist who is unable to find a life beyond the newsgroup nor employment in radio-related industry and disavowing any relationship to professionalism in the radio-electronics industry. Nuns are employed by the church. I'm not, so you can't be talking about me. Must be some sort of Catholic thing. Most but not all nuns in the USA are Roman Catholic. Even though I was brought up in that religion, I'm not part of it now. Nor for a long long time. OTOH, your buddy Brian Burke, N0IMD, was raised Roman Catholic and probably still is. Is he the one you refer to as "Nun of the Above", Len? btw, he might like to hear about who you voted for in the 2004 US presidential election. What's troubling all these heavenly fodders is lots and lots of individuals nailing theses "Theses"? I think you meant a word that rhymes with "theses", Len, only it begins with the letter F. "lots and lots of individuals"? How many? How many think differently? on the doors of the Church of St. Hiram saying that morse code testing must GO and make the "church" open to all citizens who have an interest Perhaps it would be better if people with an interest in changing the rules approached the FCC about it. Amateur radio is open to all who have enough interest to pass the required tests and get the required license. You obviously aren't one of those people. ...an interest and not a desire to dumb themselves down with old, archaic requirements that have no usefulness. Like what "old, archaic requirements"? Written tests? Licenses? You can't be talking about Morse Code skill as having no usefulness, because it's extremely useful in amateur radio. Therefore, it makes sense that the tests for an amateur radio license would include a Morse Code test. QED Ave, Imperator! Who do you address that way? Nuns are usually addressed as "Sister" or "Mother" or some other title. At least that's the way it was back when I was Roman Catholic, years and years ago. As for the Latin, it's one of the languages my ancestors used. They had world-class poetry, art, drama, philosophy, mathematics, formal logic, science, engineering, architecture, public works, a representative form of government, etc. Much of what they accomplished we still use today - even down to most of the alphabet used to write in this newsgroup. At about the same time in history, *your* ancestors were busy painting their faces blue, howling at the moon and worshipping trees. All they gave us of any value was the names of some of the days of the week. |
wrote:
Len Anderson wrote: In article .com, writes: Steve Robeson K4YZ wrote: Subject: ARS License Numbers From: Date: 1/6/2005 6:00 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: . com Lenof21 wrote: WHY? The license holder isn't prohibited from doing anything after midnight of the last day of his/her 10-year-active-license period...and for two more years into that grace period. That's simply not true, Len. The holder of an expired FCC amateur radio license cannot legally operate until the license has been renewed. This is the second time I've seen you state that mistake here in the past few days. An expired FCC amateur license carries *no* operating privleges. IS there some reason you persist in this obvious error? I told ya... His Worminess has yet laid his long-tailed ignorance to bare in a house full of rocking chairs. It's just a mistake, Steve. Len Anderson obviously doesn't understand 97.21(b). Tsk, tsk, tsk. The Nun of the Above simply didn't understand that his/her/it leg was pulled. Len, Who are you addressing as "Nun of the Above"? Can't be me. If you're pulling any body part, it isn't mine and it isn't a leg. I am sure that the part being pulled and Lennie's sexual identity crisis are the reasons behind Lennie's lack of offspring. All of this is *extremely basic* regulatory stuff, clearly stated in 97.21(b), not somebody's opinion or interpretation. Tsk. Yes, Len, one would think you'd know something that basic about Part 97. But not only are you spouting mistakes, you refuse to acknowledge them. Len has no knowledge of Amateur regulatory matters as he is not a licensed Amateur. The Nun of the Above Who would that be? has constantly made his "his"? Nuns are female. As I was saying... Lennie keeps leaving us irrefutable evidence that he has some very...uhhhh....significantly altered perceptions of gender role assingment. (Unidentified person) constantly refers to old regulations, including those made by government radio regulating agencies which no longer existed after 1934. Which old regulations, Len? The only regulations I've referred to recently are current ones. Like 97.21(b). Do you know that one? Obvioulsy not. It's available via numerous on-line resources, however it's obvious that Lennie has not availed himself of any of them. All simply MUST do so...as it has always been done...no good reasons given. Operating within the law isn't a good reason? It's "not cool" to be law-abiding in Lennie's neighborhood. As for the Latin, it's one of the languages my ancestors used. Lennie's current "schtick" is to try and undermine others posts by claiming they don't have a "working knowledge" of the language of any one specific word they may use. Ceertainly HE has no such mastery either...It's all just for argument's sake, which is all that Lennie's about any way. They had world-class poetry, art, drama, philosophy, mathematics, formal logic, science, engineering, architecture, public works, a representative form of government, etc. Much of what they accomplished we still use today - even down to most of the alphabet used to write in this newsgroup. At about the same time in history, *your* ancestors were busy painting their faces blue, howling at the moon and worshipping trees. All they gave us of any value was the names of some of the days of the week. At Lennie's age, he TURNS blue, can properly identify the moon three out of five times, and hikes a leg when he gets anywhere near a tree. Her can usually (but not always) get the days of the week in order if given a jingle to remember them by. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
These are the numbers of current, unexpired amateur licenses held by
individuals on the stated dates: As of May 14, 2000: Novice - 49,329 Technician - 205,394 Technician Plus - 128,860 General - 112,677 Advanced - 99,782 Extra - 78,750 Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 Total all classes - 674,792 As of January 31, 2005: Novice - 29,435 (decrease of 19,894) Technician - 265,739 (increase of 60,435) Technician Plus - 52,999 (decrease of 75,861) General - 137,763 (increase of 25,086) Advanced - 77,523 (decrease of 22,259) Extra - 106,121 (increase of 27,371) Total Tech/TechPlus - 318,738 (decrease of 15,516) Total all classes - 669,580 (decrease of 4812) Note that these totals do not include licenses that have expired but are in the grace period. They also do not include club, military, RACES or other station-only licenses. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Total Tech/TechPlus - 318,738 (decrease of 15,516)
Total all classes - 669,580 (decrease of 4812) Yep dumbing Down is really working now. |
WA8ULX wrote: Total Tech/TechPlus - 318,738 (decrease of 15,516) Total all classes - 669,580 (decrease of 4812) Yep dumbing Down is really working now. Worked for you. Congrats. |
Oh gee -- the USA ARS License numbers are decreasing about 2% in 5 years
At that rate in 500 years, we will be a dead dodo (Ain't statistics wundeful wunderful?) -- Caveat Lector (Reader Beware) "bb" wrote in message ups.com... WA8ULX wrote: Total Tech/TechPlus - 318,738 (decrease of 15,516) Total all classes - 669,580 (decrease of 4812) Yep dumbing Down is really working now. Worked for you. Congrats. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com