| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
January 18th 05, 08:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Lenof21 wrote:
In article .com, writes: Of course it's also possible that Len has gotten so desperate for attention that he's intentionally posting untrue things (like the legality of operating with an expired license mistake) just to get a response. "Desperately?!?" Umm, no. "desperate" BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHEHEHEHEHEHEH. Excuse me, yer lordship, lost control there... Bwhaha...oops. After all, how does it affect *him* if some ham reads his words, thinks they're true, and operates illegally? HAMS rule amateur radio. FCC doesn't require commissioners or staff to hold amateur radio licenses in order to regulate U.S. amateur radio. Ergo, J.P. logic has it that NO HAM SHOULD OBEY THE FCC IF THEY DON'T HAVE HAM LICENSES! ?!?!? Poop Dave the 1st would claim the FCC isn't "motivated." The Coslonaut (heading for outer space) only wants to talk about socks. Is he really a sock-tucker? The Avenging Angle keeps nurturing his murderous hatred. The University Lecturer wants to talk about highways. That part wasn't too bad, I got a chuckle out of it. This newsgroup be gettin' FUN-EEEE! :-) We cudden't do it witout ya! 8^) Too bad the PCTA extras aren't talking about amateur radio or the morse code test issue. Start a thread about the Morse code issue. Personally, I don't have anywhere near as high an interest in Morse code as you do. |
|
#3
January 18th 05, 08:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lenof21 wrote: In article .com, writes: Of course it's also possible that Len has gotten so desperate for attention that he's intentionally posting untrue things (like the legality of operating with an expired license mistake) just to get a response. "Desperately?!?" BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHEHEHEHEHEHEH. Excuse me, yer lordship, lost control there... Bwhaha...oops. You lose control EVERYwhere, Lennie. We expect it. After all, how does it affect *him* if some ham reads his words, thinks they're true, and operates illegally? HAMS rule amateur radio. FCC doesn't require commissioners or staff to hold amateur radio licenses in order to regulate U.S. amateur radio. Which has absolutely NO bearing on YOUR assertion, and failure to retract same, about the legality of operating after the end of the term of license. You have previously claimed to be a "radio professional". Your posts herein present evidence to the contrary. Ergo, J.P. logic has it that NO HAM SHOULD OBEY THE FCC IF THEY DON'T HAVE HAM LICENSES! A logical person would realize that a perosn is NOT a Ham if they don't have a license. Surprising that you didn't catch this, Lennie, since YOU are IN that category. Poop Dave the 1st would claim the FCC isn't "motivated." The Coslonaut (heading for outer space) only wants to talk about socks. Is he really a sock-tucker? Hmmmm....Yet ANOTHER example of Lennie initiating diminutives when not the recipient of same from that person. Why does Lennie continue to present evidence that supports everyone ELSES contention that he's a spiteful and deceitful creep? The Avenging Angle keeps nurturing his murderous hatred. If anyone, least of all me, was nuturing "murderous hatred" against you, Lennie, you would have long ago been relegated to "curious footnote" in the history of this newsgroup. The opportunities and the technology are just too numerous and available to have not availed themselves to your overdue demise. The University Lecturer wants to talk about highways. And he IS a university lecturer. And YOU were...?!?! This newsgroup be gettin' FUN-EEEE! Help, Lennie...seek HELP...And NOT from spouses' who's certificate are endorsed "K-Tel Skool of Sigh-Kyatry" Too bad the PCTA extras aren't talking about amateur radio or the morse code test issue. We do. This is not the ONLY forum in which we can express ourselves. Since we HAVE Amateur licenses, we can actually discuss AMATEUR matters ON-THE-AIR! You, on the otherhand, and with the exceptions of cellphones, cordless exensions, and CB radio, cannot. Putz. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#4
January 19th 05, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lenof21 wrote:
In article .com, writes: Of course it's also possible that Len has gotten so desperate for attention that he's intentionally posting untrue things (like the legality of operating with an expired license mistake) just to get a response. "Desperately?!?" No, Len. "Desperate". BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHEHEHEHEHEHEH. Excuse me, yer lordship, lost control there... Bwhaha...oops. We'll wait while you go freshen up, Len. ;-) You do appear to be desperate for attention. After all, how does it affect *him* if some ham reads his words, thinks they're true, and operates illegally? HAMS rule amateur radio. You seem to think so, but you're mistaken. Just as you are mistaken about the legality of FCC-licensed radio amateurs operating amateur radio stations while their amateur radio licenses are expired but in the grace period. FCC doesn't require commissioners or staff to hold amateur radio licenses in order to regulate U.S. amateur radio. That's true. Those people *are* required to have other qualifications, though, and to be appointed to their positions. You're neither a radio amateur nor part of the FCC. And you never have been, Len. You don't have the qualifications to be either. Ergo, J.P. logic has it that NO HAM SHOULD OBEY THE FCC IF THEY DON'T HAVE HAM LICENSES! Nope. Nowhere do I say that. You're simply mistaken, Len. What I will say is that *you* do not "rule amateur radio", Len. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
| First BPL License Awarded - | Boatanchors | |||
| First BPL License Awarded - | Boatanchors | |||
Hybrid Mode
