In article .net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes:



As I've stated several times, I don't really care what her reasonings
were. It's simply not my job to judge Kim.

Dwight:

Fine, then leave it up to me. I am an intelligent, educated, mature and
responsible person, and thus highly qualified to make judgements on
things like Kim's callsign -- and based on the evidence provided thereby,
her character.

I've told Kim what I think, and
that is enough. I don't see any reason to keep repeating myself. And I
certainly don't see any reason to repeat myself over and over through a
several year period as some in this newsgroup have done.

The main purpose of the "repetition" is to keep the issue on the "front
burner" as it were. Kim has acted irresponsibly by choosing a call sign
which incites controversy. Well, that's what she wanted, now she will
have to deal with it. Twice today, she has posted suggestions that she
wants this thread to go away. Well, only she can make that happen.
And she knows how.

73 de Larry, K3LT

In article , ospam
(Larry Roll K3LT) writes:

In article .net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes:

As I've stated several times, I don't really care what her reasonings
were. It's simply not my job to judge Kim.

Dwight:

Fine, then leave it up to me. I am an intelligent, educated, mature and
responsible person, and thus highly qualified to make judgements on
things like Kim's callsign -- and based on the evidence provided thereby,
her character.

Yes, we all KNOW how you bragged about those wonderful
grades and class standings while becoming a Human
Resources (personnel) professional, could get your pick of
jobs, etc., etc., etc., ...and then became a bus driver. :-)

All that while telling us of your distinguished, vital, important
USAF career where you always knew more than your officers,
were more smarts, noble, self-sacrificing to learn how to do
20 WPM morse...just like hams did in the 1930s before you
were born.

Sunnavagun!

I've told Kim what I think, and
that is enough. I don't see any reason to keep repeating myself. And I
certainly don't see any reason to repeat myself over and over through a
several year period as some in this newsgroup have done.

The main purpose of the "repetition" is to keep the issue on the "front
burner" as it were. Kim has acted irresponsibly by choosing a call sign
which incites controversy. Well, that's what she wanted, now she will
have to deal with it. Twice today, she has posted suggestions that she
wants this thread to go away. Well, only she can make that happen.
And she knows how.

Heh...I thought it was to remind certain folks to Step To The BACK
Of The Bus. :-)

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 wrote:

Yes, we all KNOW how you bragged about those wonderful
grades and class standings while becoming a Human
Resources (personnel) professional, could get your pick of
jobs, etc., etc., etc., ...and then became a bus driver. :-)

All that while telling us of your distinguished, vital, important
USAF career where you always knew more than your officers,
were more smarts, noble, self-sacrificing to learn how to do
20 WPM morse...just like hams did in the 1930s before you
were born.

Sunnavagun!

A perfect time for the profile of your likely actions, Leonard.

N2EY: "Besides, here's a simple, plain fact:

No matter what job, educational level, employer, or
government/military service that a radio amateur has, if said radio
amateur opposes Mr. Anderson's views, he/she will be the target of Mr.
Anderson's insults, ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic
slurs, excessive emoticons and general infantile behavior."

Please continue your civil debate on the elimination of morse testing in
the Amateur Radio Service in which you are not involved.

Dave K8MN