Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Carl R. Stevenson"
writes: "Dick Carroll;" wrote in message ... As you may know, FISTS has many times the membership numbers of NCI. How many *US* licensees are members of FISTS, Dick? Lots and lots. How many *US* licensees are members of NCI, Carl? btw, the FISTS member list is online. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
N2EY wrote:
In article , "Carl R. Stevenson" writes: "Dick Carroll;" wrote in message ... As you may know, FISTS has many times the membership numbers of NCI. How many *US* licensees are members of FISTS, Dick? Lots and lots. How many *US* licensees are members of NCI, Carl? btw, the FISTS member list is online. I've given it a read. It sounds pretty good, I agree with it for the most part, and it is doomed. Won't happen. Not in a million years. It's not the way we are heading. How do you justify a trained group of communicators that are versed in a mode that is as useful and needed as CW is? There isn't an emergency right now. It's not the way we are heading. Perhaps some day they will see the value, just like all the people who build houses in flood plains - Hey, those areas are dry 99.5 percent of the time! - Mike KB3EIA - |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... How do you justify a trained group of communicators that are versed in a mode that is as useful and needed as CW is? There isn't an emergency right now. It's especially hard when the emergency management agencies have no use for a cadre of CW ops ... it's not the type of communications that they want or need. Just as the CW NTS nets are anachronisms ... Carl - wk3c |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Carl R. Stevenson"
writes: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... How do you justify a trained group of communicators that are versed in a mode that is as useful and needed as CW is? There isn't an emergency right now. It's especially hard when the emergency management agencies have no use for a cadre of CW ops ... it's not the type of communications that they want or need. KT4ST has shown that to be untrue. However, with all due respect, Carl, I don't think you'd be the most effective salesman for the mode... Just as the CW NTS nets are anachronisms ... What about SSB NTS nets? Are they anachronisms? A CW NTS net can handle more traffic in less time using less spectrum than an SSB NTS net. Been there, done that. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: N2EY wrote: In article , "Carl R. Stevenson" writes: "Dick Carroll;" wrote in message ... As you may know, FISTS has many times the membership numbers of NCI. How many *US* licensees are members of FISTS, Dick? Lots and lots. How many *US* licensees are members of NCI, Carl? btw, the FISTS member list is online. I've given it a read. It sounds pretty good, I agree with it for the most part, and it is doomed. Won't happen. Not in a million years. It's not the way we are heading. Maybe it will make a difference, maybe it won't. But no matter what happens, there will have been a proposal and a lot of commentary opposing the dropping of all code tests. How do you justify a trained group of communicators that are versed in a mode that is as useful and needed as CW is? There isn't an emergency right now. It's not the way we are heading. True - the "fashion" for the past 25+ years has been to reduce the license test requirements - code *and* written. Perhaps some day they will see the value, just like all the people who build houses in flood plains - Hey, those areas are dry 99.5 percent of the time! Let it never be said that there was no opposition. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , "Carl R. Stevenson" writes: "Dick Carroll;" wrote in message ... As you may know, FISTS has many times the membership numbers of NCI. How many *US* licensees are members of FISTS, Dick? Lots and lots. A real specific answer ... How many *US* licensees are members of NCI, Carl? Thousands, and growing every day :-) btw, the FISTS member list is online. If you took the time to look, and it's public, why didn't you answer my question? However, we *don't* publish our membership list ... we respect the privacy of our members and keep the data they give us confidential, don't sell it to SPAMers, etc. Part of the reason is the abuse that some PCTAs dish our ... why would we subject our members to abusive e-mail? (Yes, I get the occasional rant, but that's what the DEL key is for ... but I'm inherently public because of my office in the organization.) Carl - wk3c |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|