Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net, "Bill Sohl"
writes: IF morse (i.e. radiotelegraphy) had any basis as a foundation for higher learning of radio concepts, principles or theory then it would be a requirement of engineering students...which it has never been to my knowledge anywhere. Faulty logic, Bill. "Radio" is but a small, specialized part of electrical engineering. That's one reason Morse isn't and wasn't part of the curriculum. Heck, soldering is a much bigger part of electrical engineering than radio, and soldering is not taught in EE school either. But if someone wants to learn radio on their own, and wants to learn-by-doing, amateur radio can be a really fun way to learn. Skill in Morse code is an excellent tool in that learning process. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | General |