"Robert" wrote in message
...

"Clint" rattlehead@computronDOTnet wrote

[ transmitting a 6 mega-pixel image]

I never claimed you COULD send that with CW.


well, I was just responding to his words he tried to
shove in my mouth.


It would only take 138.88 days.....

hey, we're rock'n!

Clint
KB5ZHT

"Clint" rattlehead@computronDOTnet wrote in message
...

"Robert" wrote in message
...

"Clint" rattlehead@computronDOTnet wrote

[ transmitting a 6 mega-pixel image]

I never claimed you COULD send that with CW.


well, I was just responding to his words he tried to
shove in my mouth.


It would only take 138.88 days.....

hey, we're rock'n!

Clint
KB5ZHT



It continues to amaze me how these no knowledge, no experience, code haters
think they know so much about the mode.

Dan/W4NTI

I don't know hardly any code haters myself. I myself aren't one, I
enjoy using it. Most the hams I know either love it or are indifferent
towards it, that is, they have no opinion on the use of CW one
way or the other.

It's the testing of a skill that you may or may not elect to use
that I think meets rejection.

Clint
KB5ZHT

In article k.net,
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes:

It continues to amaze me how these no knowledge, no experience, code haters
think they know so much about the mode.

Dan/W4NTI

It continues to amaze me how those no-knowledge, no-experience, code
lovers of amateur radio cannot get on the ball and overcome their
ignorance of all the other modes of communictions!

LHA