Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Some also seem to miss the fact that nowhere does it say that the FCC *must* eleminate code testing for any class of license. It is only that the IARU "supports the removal of Morse code testing", it does not state it must be removed. correct. But it does at least show proof of another organization that no longer unilaterally and unquestioningly supports it's continued testing, and also takes away from the argument that the 5wmp test needs to be perpetuated to meet internationaly law. Oh, and at least YOU acknowledge that they said "supports the removal"... your fellow PCTA type Dick Carroll somehow just can't read that. Clint KB5ZHT |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I notice a *lot* of spin from the ham radio press in the direction of removing code testing that isn't supported in the documentation of WRC and others. Wonder what their agenda might be? (heh ) quoting documentation and official paperwork/letters is fact, not spin. what SPIN includes is reading that documentation that was quoted and saying that the international organization does NOT support it's removal, when, um, it *does*. Clint KB5ZHT |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
It is a puzzle to me why you continue to make a point of "rubbing peoples nose in it". Perhaps "well meaning" doesn't apply in your case. Hans perhaps you are confusing "rubbing peoples nose in it" with "haveing a strong desire not to allow an inaccurate spin be placed upon the topic", as well as "not wanting a misrepresentation of the facts to go without a balancing, differing opinion". Clint KB5ZHT |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Hans Kohb" wrote in message news:d637413962fc29c05122efcd088c4126.128005@mygat e.mailgate.org... "Carl R. Stevenson" wrote ***** I particularly love that last paragraph .. they're finally moving from the past into, at least, the present. Carl - wk3c Carl, As you know, I do not support continuing the Morse exam. Other well meaning people disagree with me and I respect their disagreement. It is a puzzle to me why you continue to make a point of "rubbing peoples nose in it". Perhaps "well meaning" doesn't apply in your case. Hans Hans, I simply stated that I "love that paragraph ... etc." ... indicating that I'm pleased with the IARU Administrative Council's policy decision. That is simply a fact (the expression that I'm glad the IARU is becoming more progressive). If you *choose* to interpret that as "rubbing peoples' noses in it" I can't help that. Carl - wk3c |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Well, Clint, you said it, not me! I'm glad you're starting to see the light! 73 de Larry, K3LT I, I see your point. I will be the absolute BEST driver of a modern internal combustion engine- driven automobile if I first take a blacksmith's apprenticeship and learn to shoe a horse. Yes. Quite logical. Clint KB5ZHT |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 01:57:16 +0000 (UTC), "Hans Kohb"
wrote: "Carl R. Stevenson" wrote ***** I particularly love that last paragraph .. they're finally moving from the past into, at least, the present. Carl - wk3c Carl, As you know, I do not support continuing the Morse exam. Other well meaning people disagree with me and I respect their disagreement. It is a puzzle to me why you continue to make a point of "rubbing peoples nose in it". Perhaps "well meaning" doesn't apply in your case. Hans No...something along these lines would be "rubbing peoples nose in it." BWAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
I will be the absolute BEST driver of a modern internal combustion engine- driven automobile if I first take a blacksmith's apprenticeship and learn to shoe a horse. Correct again Clint. The better you are at that will make you much better at changing a tire. LOL now THERE'S a stretch. Clint KB5ZHT |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Clint" rattlehead at
computron dot net writes: Well, Clint, you said it, not me! I'm glad you're starting to see the light! 73 de Larry, K3LT I, I see your point. I will be the absolute BEST driver of a modern internal combustion engine- driven automobile if I first take a blacksmith's apprenticeship and learn to shoe a horse. Yes. Quite logical. Clint KB5ZHT Well, Clint, that kind of cynicism may seem to be amusing to some, but just goes to demonstrate a lack of any truly logical argument which supports your position. Therefore, it, and you, are easily dismissed. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Larry Roll K3LT wrote:
In article , "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net writes: Well, Clint, you said it, not me! I'm glad you're starting to see the light! 73 de Larry, K3LT I, I see your point. I will be the absolute BEST driver of a modern internal combustion engine- driven automobile if I first take a blacksmith's apprenticeship and learn to shoe a horse. Yes. Quite logical. Clint KB5ZHT Well, Clint, that kind of cynicism may seem to be amusing to some, but just goes to demonstrate a lack of any truly logical argument which supports your position. Therefore, it, and you, are easily dismissed. I don't know about you, Larry, but I like to know a lot about everything I do. That goes for cars, amateur radio, computers, housework, history, or whatever. I suspect you feel at least somewhat this way too. Strange that there is a whole culture built up that celebrates ignorance. That's why if my car breaks down on the road, I stand a good chance of getting it running again, why I know it isn't likely the F.C.C. won't test me on the design of a 1/4 wave dipole, and why I knew that there wasn't any special callsigns for non-coded amateurs. Not that I don't make mistakes, but I don't come into newsgroups acting as if I know everything either! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Coslo wrote:
Larry Roll K3LT wrote: In article , "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net writes: Well, Clint, you said it, not me! I'm glad you're starting to see the light! 73 de Larry, K3LT I, I see your point. I will be the absolute BEST driver of a modern internal combustion engine- driven automobile if I first take a blacksmith's apprenticeship and learn to shoe a horse. Yes. Quite logical. Clint KB5ZHT Well, Clint, that kind of cynicism may seem to be amusing to some, but just goes to demonstrate a lack of any truly logical argument which supports your position. Therefore, it, and you, are easily dismissed. I don't know about you, Larry, but I like to know a lot about everything I do. That goes for cars, amateur radio, computers, housework, history, or whatever. I suspect you feel at least somewhat this way too. Strange that there is a whole culture built up that celebrates ignorance. That's why if my car breaks down on the road, I stand a good chance of getting it running again, why I know it isn't likely the F.C.C. won't test me on the design of a 1/4 wave dipole, and why I knew that there wasn't any special callsigns for non-coded amateurs. Not that I don't make mistakes, but I don't come into newsgroups acting as if I know everything either! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - Just thought I'd add my two cents worth to the subject....It's about time the FCC eradicated this ancient mode of communicaton. The FEDS even stopped using it...Time for Amateur Radio to do the same! -- 73 Frank K3EKO |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|