| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Dick Carroll
writes: Dick Carroll wrote: Then there is the very strong possibility, given the wording of FCC documents and statements of staff,-- **wording which NCI members choose to interpret as stating intent to totally do away with code testing, but which doesn't say that at all** --that they may NOT drop element one at all, and instead grant low band HF access to one or more of the current lower grades of license which now have none. That's a totally justifiable position, the no-code mantra aside. Further, the fact has recently surfaced that the UK did exactly this instead of completely dropping code testing, as was so widely and loudly stated by NCI members. It's just not mandatory anymore. UK issues issue code-tested licenses, and the word is that a majority of UK hams prefer to take those tests, and qualify as code-licensed hams with a callsign issued that indicates that fact. If they want to - but they don't have to. Perhaps there's a possibility there - have code tests, but have them be non-mandatory. Perhaps 1x2 calls could be reserved.... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
| Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
| Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
| Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
| SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna | |||