Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D. Stussy" wrote in message . org... A more important question: Why do you think WE care? Another mental case who thinks that his screwed-up opinion represents everybody else's thinking. They call that - meglomania. Sorry to be the one to have break it to you, "D.", but there are thousands of packet radio operators in the U.S. who DO care about the hobby. I don't dispute that. However, there are plenty of packet operators who also know that TAPR has been a non-functional group long before a decade ago. What you posted isn't news to anyone (nor does it really belong on the "policy" group - there are packet specific groups). There you go again, assuming that your screwed-up opinion represents everybody else's thinking. They call that - meglomania. Maybe you should mention this to your physician. The nastygram opinions of disruptive, anti-ham jerkoffs such as yourself have no significance whatsoever. Charles Brabham, N5PVL And you do? By starting this thread, you have proved only that you are and shall always remain a legend in your own mind. Hey, I'm just reporting a bit of news that not everyone may have been aware of. You'd be amazed how many hams think of TAPR as a packet radio organization, even in the ARRL. That's the extent of the significance of my post. Code/No-Code has no place in a "policy" newsgroup either, but guess what? Charles Brabham, N5PVL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Important Research at TAPR | Digital | |||
Important Research at TAPR | Digital | |||
Anyone have mid 1960s Spiegel catalogs? (radio history research project) | Boatanchors | |||
Anyone have mid 1960s Spiegel catalogs? (radio history research project) | Equipment | |||
Using ham bands for educational / research project | Policy |