![]() |
"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message gy.com... "Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... "N2EY" wrote in message [snip all the long thread] 'Zactly. Kim W5TIT Just to illustrate the idiocy of some of the people on the freeway, I'll throw in a personal anecdote. I was driving down a multilane freeway through a construction zone and I was in the rightmost lane. I was going with the flow of the traffic in the slow lane, which was slightly above the limit posted for the construction zone. A semi truck comes up behind me, rides my bumper, honks, flashes his lights. Now, I'm already in the slow lane with no way to speed up since the vehicles ahead of me aren't going any faster and wouldn't want to anyway as there is too much chance to hurt a construction worker plus fines in construction zones are very steep here. This idiot keeps it up until we are out of the construction zone and it is possible to move further to the right. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE You must have been driving near Dallas...GRIN Kim W5TIT Nope. It was near Detroit, MI. We also have a problem that sometimes mandates driving regularly in the leftmost lane in some areas. We have a lot of left side freeway exits. Sometimes traffic is heavy enough that you'd better get into that left lane at least 5 miles before you get to the exit or you will never be able to get over to it. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... [snip] But I liken it to the same thing as someone who is at an intersection with others--in Texas it is common (though I would venture to say illegal) that the first person at a stop sign goes first. This practice ignores all right-of-way laws I learned when I was learning to drive, but it is common practice. So, do I part from common practice and keep sitting at a stop sign, waiting for the person going straight to go through the intersection before I take my turn? The typical law in the states that I am familiar with is that at a 4 way stop says that the person arriving at the stop first goes through the intersection first. If two or more vehicles arrive simultaneously, the one furthest to the right in the circle goes first (i.e. the person who has no vehicle immediately to his/her right at the intersection). If four arrive simultaneously, well there's no rule for that and someone has to take the courteous route of gesturing the cross traffic across before taking their turn. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:17:03 GMT, KØHB wrote:
I don't know about Texas law, but I spent part of the spring and early summer in Germany. Over there you ABSOLUTELY stay out of the left lane unless you in the act of overtaking and passing. If you dilly-dally around in that lane and hold up traffic overtaking you from the rear, you'll be cited and the fine is of some consequence IIRC Ohio and a bunch of other states had that law years ago. I don't know if they still do - I'll leave that to the Ahians. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 23:31:33 GMT, Dee D. Flint wrote:
We also have a problem that sometimes mandates driving regularly in the leftmost lane in some areas. We have a lot of left side freeway exits. Sometimes traffic is heavy enough that you'd better get into that left lane at least 5 miles before you get to the exit or you will never be able to get over to it. We have one spot on a major freeway in Portland (US 26 eastbound) where it goes into a three-way split very shortly after a tunnel in which there is no lane changes permitted. There are big signs "urging" motorists to get in the proper lane long before the tunnel because both the left-hand split (I-405 North) and the right-hand split (I-405 South) do not have convenient exits for recovering from a bad choice. The straight-ahead split leaves you on the downtown streets, which again does not have a convenient recovery option. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
I don't accept JJ's submission at all. One has to register to view the The Ft. Worth Star Telegram's article archives, so I didn't look any further. However, will you accept a submission from the National Highway Traffic Safety Adminstration (DOT) website instead? If so, this link will take you to a description of Texas traffic laws. Scroll down words "Minimum Speed Limit" on the left and then read the information to the right of that (quoted below). http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/inju...98/txspeed.htm Minimum Speed Limit: I. No person shall drive so slowly as to impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic. Tran. Code §545.363(a) II. A person, driving at less than the normal speed of traffic, shall drive in the right-hand lane then available for traffic or as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway. Tran. Code §545.051(b) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
I'd go along with that. However, I have always (maybe incorrectly, but...) interpreted that "rule" to mean traffic that is going *slower than the posted speed.* Wrong? Right? (snip) In general, you're right. Nobody is supposed to break the speed limit, so laws about slower vehicles moving to the right and not impeding the flow of traffic don't defend the speeder's actions. But, by the same token, slower drivers are supposed to move to the right and not impede the flow of traffic (if those are the laws in your state), so someone speeding doesn't defend the actions of the slower driver who is impeding the flow of traffic either. I know that sounds strange, but there is some logic behind it. On multiple lane highways, congestion (cars bunching too closely together) is one of the most common causes of accidents. And congestion is dangerious at all highway speeds, but even more so when drivers are speeding. To prevent that bunching up, many states have adopted laws to encourage slower drivers to move to the right so faster vehicles can proceed without bunching up behind the slower vehicle. The idea is to keep all vehicles flowing smoothly - yes, even if some are speeding. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
"Dee D. Flint" wrote:
The typical law in the states that I am familiar with is that at a 4 way stop says that the person arriving at the stop first goes through the intersection first. If two or more vehicles arrive simultaneously, the one furthest to the right in the circle goes first (i.e. the person who has no vehicle immediately to his/her right at the intersection). If four arrive simultaneously, well there's no rule for that and someone has to take the courteous route of gesturing the cross traffic across before taking their turn. Exactly the same in each of the states I'm familiar with (and that is a good number of states). Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Kim W5TIT wrote:
"JJ" wrote in message ... N2EY wrote: Hmmm... She's going with the flow of traffic, *above* the posted speed limit, but she should slow down and change lanes so that someone who wants to go even faster can get by? Yes, in Texas it is the law. You are supposed to drive in the right lane and use the left lane for passing, even if you are doing the speed limit or over, you are obliged to pull to the right lane to let another pass. The following is an exerpt from an article in the Ft. Worth Star Telegram, April 12, 2003. ************************************ Texans must drive in the right-hand lane. In other words -- move over. Yes, you. Get out of the left lane. I don't care how fast you're driving. Or what the speed limit is. Texas law is blunt. Except to pass, motorists "shall drive in the right-hand lane." Both chronic slowpokes and self-appointed speed-limit vigilantes were stung by transportation writer Gordon Dickson's report. He told how habitual left-lane drivers are "despised" and how some traffic engineers believe they cause wrecks. I am not going to defend the lunatics who zoom up from behind at rush hour, bearing down two inches behind your rear bumper and so close that you can smell the extra-grande Starbucks coffee on their breath. But the law is the law. Yes, it says drivers can't speed or tailgate. But it also says to stay out of the left lane. Some violators are obviously in denial. That was an excerpt from the Startlegram? Shocking. This violator isn't in denial at all. This violator is waiting for mere words to turn into action... Kim W5TIT So your mentality is, "until I am caught, I will continue to break the law." Do you speed throught school zones with that same attitude? |
Kim W5TIT wrote:
I don't accept JJ's submission at all. Perhaps if he'd reference more than just the name of a newspaper, I could go and do some research myself. What *part* of the "submission" from JJ is actually from the newspaper? The line that says, "Texans must drive in the right-hand lane" or the rest or any other part of it? I just tried on the Startlegram (an affectionate local colloquialism for the Ft Worth newspaper) to lookup any news article with "traffic" in it and didn't pull a thing related to what JJ has above. Not even anything remotely connected for that matter. So, JJ, how 'bout something a little more concrete. By the way, the research did just net that beginning on Sep 1 of this year there is some new law in effect regarding police safety on highways during traffic stops. Here, go read it yourself, assuming you can read, if not, maybe your kids can read it to you. http://www.broward.com/mld/starteleg...dy/5618883.htm |
"KØHB" wrote:
I don't know about Texas law, but I spent part of the spring and early summer in Germany. Over there you ABSOLUTELY stay out of the left lane unless you in the act of overtaking and passing. If you dilly-dally around in that lane and hold up traffic overtaking you from the rear, you'll be cited and the fine is of some consequence (250 Euro's if I recall correctly.) Traffic in Germany is SO much better, because everyone moves crisply in and out of the 'passing lanes', rather than the buttheads here who take their sweet leisurely time about overtaking and passing, often just 1 or 2 MPH faster than the right hand traffic lane is moving. I really enjoyed driving in Germany also. At first, the autobahns were shocking. But, after I got used to it (a couple of years), I drove just as fast as everyone else. Later, after I gained more experience (and a vehicle that could safely do it), driving at 110 to 120 mph on the autobahn was fairly routine - faster if I was in a hurry to get somewhere. At those speeds, it is critical for all drivers to cooperate. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com