| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
gy.com... "Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... Yep. Why should a person's abilities determine what tax they pay? Is there a deduction right now for a lack of abilities? One thing I think ought to be done away with is elderly folks paying school taxes. It's ridiculous. Not at all. The elderly benefited in their youth from public schools and in their productive years from schools for their children. Do you honestly think that in that limited time span that the percentage of the tax that went to the schools was enough to cover their own education and that of their children? My total annual property taxes are less than it would take to send one child to private school for one year. The public schools make it up by spreading it over a taxpayer's lifetime. Or are you saying that during their working years, a person's property taxes ought to be increased? Welp, whatever it takes, I suppose...I'm just not a supporter of as much taxation as there is. And, I think Sr. Ctitizens shouldn't have to pay taxes and that if that needs to be accommodated, then the school taxes should be increased during the years of some hereto-undertemined-age-limit based timeframe. YMMV Keep in mind that even if a person never has children, they still benefit from the public education of the community as a whole. If they did not pay school taxes, they would end up paying increased taxes to support an increased number of people on welfare. It's far cheaper to pay school taxes so people can be productive than to support them on welfare. Hmmm, hadn't thought about the people not having kids. If they aren't going to add to the burden of society (terrible way to put that...but) by having kids, then they get the break, too. After all...it'd probably come up a wash anyway; a trade for the tax-break they'd get on their annual income for not having to pay school tax if they don't have kids. I like the idea of giving people who choose *NOT* to have kids breaks (on local school taxes), as well as those who choose to have kids (on federal income tax deductions). Whatever the IRS considers as income...the total taxable income that is reported on a W-2--and that's determined by IRS rules, which ultimately, I suppose are determined by we the People (yeah, right, but you get the gist). They keep changing the rules on that you know. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Yeah, but this is a democracy--we have a voice in that (pfffffft, right, eh?). Kim W5TIT |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
| ARRL FUD about BPL | General | |||