Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote:
I agree, Dwight. What I find most distressing about NCI is that as a late comer to the game, they were in a position to offer some leadership in the "brave new world" post CW. While there is no question that Carl supports retention of technical acumen in the service, some other members do not. If I were in charge, I would have a plan all mapped out to fill the coming vacuum. Of course its hard for me to say what that plan would be, because I support continuned Morse code testing. 8^) Agreed. By the time NCI joined the debate, the debate was pretty much resolved. So, instead of linking themselves to this one issue, they may have better served the Ham community by focusing more on what follows. But, I don't think there is any consensus on what might follow. Since most are satisfied with everything else, I suspect the code test debate may be the last big debate in the Ham community. Of course, they'll always be small debates, but not nearly as widespead or as all consuming as this one. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |