Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Sohl wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message t... KØHB wrote: "Bill Sohl" wrote BUT, his NCI membership doesn't tie NCI to Han's personal support for an entry level license. Are you saying that NCI does not reciprocate my support for their goals? That would certainly be a strange sort of membership-organization. Sorry Hans! Only elimination of the Test! Essentually correct. NCI doesn't take positions on the wider scope of testing and opinions held by any individual member. Indeed, one could readily see where two members might have totally opposite opinions on written testing. And that is what bothers me about NCI. Why that bothers anyone makes no sense to me. Indeed, we are damned if we do, damn;ed if we don't. We formed as a "one issue" organization and now some folks are bothered by that...strange, truly strange. Well, I'm sorry about it Bill, but that is how it works. Spoils of success. In the world of politics, there is no such thing as a one issue organization. When agitating for the addition or removal of something, there must be some kind of plan for afterward. If there is no plan, then one of two things happened. Either there was an immense amount of naivety, or a concept of "no plan for the aftermath" was made". I'm bothered by it now because I'm new to the ARS and didn't even know about NCI in it's early years. I would have taken NCI members to task if I was a ham then. But it is a great way to dodge responsibility! 8^) Dodge responsibilities? So exactly what does that mean? What specific "responsibility" is NCI dodging? Did I miss some unstated responsibility of NCI and/or any other ham club or organization? Yes you did miss it, IMO! What other Morse code pro/con advocacy groups are there? NCI is the one standing around when the change happened, it happened their way, and now all we hear is some people's personal beliefs when they should be at least putting together a plan for the aftermath of the ARS, post Element one. The two I have seen I'm not overwhelmed with. So I will be yapping about what I percieve to be a *grave* error in omission. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |