| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brian" wrote in message om... [major snip] I'll support it, perhaps with Han's caveat of a non-renewable learner's permit, limited by power and scope, but not mode. Supporting a "learner's permit" license contradicts the concept of not having class distinctions as discussed in the earlier part the post. Once you have more than one license class for any reason, you have a class distinction, which according to your posts is undesirable. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
| ARRL FUD about BPL | General | |||