"Brian" wrote in message
m...
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
igy.com...
"Brian" wrote in message
om...
[major snip] I'll support it, perhaps with Han's caveat
of a non-renewable learner's permit, limited by power and scope, but
not mode.

Supporting a "learner's permit" license contradicts the concept of not
having class distinctions as discussed in the earlier part the post.

Of course it doesn't.

Once
you have more than one license class for any reason, you have a class
distinction, which according to your posts is undesirable.

It's not a class. Its a learners permit - a temp.

Even though only temporary, it's still a separate class.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com...
"Brian" wrote in message
m...
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
igy.com...
"Brian" wrote in message
om...
[major snip] I'll support it, perhaps with Han's caveat
of a non-renewable learner's permit, limited by power and scope, but
not mode.

Supporting a "learner's permit" license contradicts the concept of not
having class distinctions as discussed in the earlier part the post.

Of course it doesn't.

Once
you have more than one license class for any reason, you have a class
distinction, which according to your posts is undesirable.

It's not a class. Its a learners permit - a temp.

Even though only temporary, it's still a separate class.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Says you.

Do you see career divers motoring around with a 6 month permit?