| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
KØHB wrote:
"N2EY" wrote Second and more important is, if we don't use spectrum as an incentive, what do we use? Incentive? Jim, you sound like a typical eastern liberal with an agenda of social engineering. Thank goodness the Conservatives have NO social engineering agenda!!! You're either qualified for a ham license or you're not qualified. This incentive notion (and Steve Robeson's 'structured occupancy' notion) are liberal ideas whose time has gone. Personally I think good true conservative idea is to allow people on the air with no licencing requirements whatsoever, then cull out the ones that violate the rules. - Mike KB3EIA - |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
| ARRL FUD about BPL | General | |||