Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... "Bill Sohl" wrote Assuming "free upgrades" as was noted in your post, what's the overall harm? You're a bright guy, Bill, so surely you can see the "overall harm", but maybe you're having some trouble shaking off the effects of your New Years Eve celebration, so I'll spell it out for you. Today, passing the Amateur Extra exam is the qualification required for full amateur privileges. An existing General or Advanced licensee has passed a less comprehensive set of examinations, and has not (by FCC definition) demonstrated qualification for full amateur privileges. If FCC suddenly upgrades all General and Advanced licenses to Amateur Extra, then ipso facto and ipso jure the qualification required for full amateur privileges has been lowered by two full steps. Only on a one-time basis. The question still is, what is the harm of such a one-time "fix." Given that sad state of affairs, now any NEW amateur hopefuls can reasonably plead that any examination more comprehensive than the current General discriminates against new applicants. They can plead all they want...doesn't make it so. The FCC could certainly counter argue the upgrades were a one-time need to simplify the overall license structure. YMMV Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |