| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
KØHB wrote:
"N2EY" wrote Suppose FCC enacted your proposal as you submitted it. Why would a person with the entry-level license be qualified for that license for ten years but then be unqualified for it after ten years? Particularly if they were willing to retest for the same license? It's a learners permit, NOT a license. If they couldn't/didn't learn enough in 10 years to pass the examination for a license, then they are obviously not qualified for a license. I might just buy that if it was something like 2 years. 73, de Hans, K0HB PS: Since it's my proposal, I get to define the terminology. Class "B" is a learners permit. Class "A" is a license. Sure enough!! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
| ARRL FUD about BPL | General | |||