Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
nk.net... "Bert Craig" wrote: (snip) The fact is that Morse code IS the second most popular mode in use in the ARS today. IMHO, that in itself is sufficient justification. (snip) And, in my humble opinion, it is not sufficient justification - no more than the fact that vacuum tubes or circular analog tuning dials were once popular justifies a requirement that they continue to be used. Clearly, unless there is a valid reason otherwise, anyone should be free to use those if he or she wants, but there should be no government regulation mandating that. The same with Morse code. Nobody's forcing anybody to use it, just learn it...and only for HF privies. Remember, we're talking about the 5-wpm test, NOT 13 0r 20. If a person has no interest in code, the speed certainly isn't going to change that. At 5-wpm, it's more a demonstration of discipline than proficiency. That is where the true crux lies. (snip) Yes, I would very much "like to continue mandating a skill test for a mode that is all but gone from the world of radio communications EXCEPT WITHIN AMATEUR USE." Thats because it's a skill test for upgrading within, not entry into, the ARS (snip) The Amateur Radio Service does not exist in a vacuum, Bert. The FCC recently said "the emphasis on Morse code proficiency as a licensing requirement does not comport with the basis and purpose of the service." They came to that conclusion after looking at modern communications systems outside Amateur Radio and the changes that have occurred in communications over the last fifty years. They noted that "no communication system has been designed in many years that depends on hand-keyed telegraphy or the ability to receive messages in Morse code by ear." And they said reducing the emphasis on telegraphy proficiency as a licensing requirement would "allow the amateur service to, as it has in the past, attract technically inclined persons, particularly the youth of our country, and encourage them to learn and to prepare themselves in the areas where the United States needs expertise." They've already reduced the emphasis by creating the no-code Technician ticket and further by reducing the required code speed for the General and Extra tickets. You mean the second most popular mode in use today doesn't rate as a valid test requirement determinator. (snip) If you're going to argue that to justify a test requirement for the second most popular mode, why not argue the same for the third, forth, or even fifth, most popular modes? Unique skill, Dwight...decoded by the human brain. Speach for phone and reading ability for digital are skills brought into the fray from day one. By the way, where did you get the idea that CW was the second most popular mode? I agree that SSB is probably the most popular. But, given the sheer numbers of Technicians today and the fact that not all others use CW on a regular basis, certainly far more people use FM than CW today. My apologies, I should have been more clear. I actually meant Phone vs. Morse code. I used SSB because I almost never use FM, only for ARES work. Additionally, I'm pretty much always on HF. Note that the newsgroups "rec.radio.cb" and "rec.radio.shortwave" were removed from this reply (off-topic in those newsgroup). Good call, Dwight. Embarassingly enough, I hadn't even noticed. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) 73 de Bert WA2SI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |